Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2000-12
Use of a Technological Prompting Device to Aid a Student with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder to Initiate and Complete Daily Tasks: An Exploratory Study
This single-subject study examined the effects of a technological prompting device for assisting a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive type, to initiate and complete daily tasks. The subject, a fourth-grade male, and his family were provided with computer software and a paging device with word prompting capabilities. The family, in collaboration with the child's teacher, selected particular behaviors to target for use with the intervention. A reversal design across settings with a third return to baseline and intervention was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the prompting device in assisting the student in remembering daily tasks. Study results demonstrated that the intervention was effective in promoting the occurrence of target behaviors but did not affect overall ADHD symptomatology. In addition, the devise appeared to be more useful in the student's structured school environment than his less-structured home environment. Parent and teacher reported a high degree of consumer satisfaction with the device. Overall, the results suggest that the use of a prompting device may be an effective technological intervention for addressing some of the memory-associated symptoms of ADHD.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
2.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.
3.
BarkleyR. A. (1990). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment. New York: The Guilford Press.
4.
BarkleyR. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.
5.
BryantB.R., & SeayP.C. (1998). The Technology-related Assistance to Individuals with Disabilities Act: Relevance to individuals with learning disabilities and their advocates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 4–15.
6.
BryantD.P.BryantB.R., & RaskindM.H. (1998). Using assistive technology to enhance the skills of students with learning disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 53–58.
7.
ConnersC. K. (1997a). Conners' Parent Rating Scale-Revised. North Towanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
8.
ConnersC. K. (1997b). Conners' Teacher Rating Scale-Revised. North Towanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
9.
ConnersC. K. (1997c). Conners' Rating Scale Manual-Revised. North Towanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
10.
DouglasV. I. (1983). Attention and cognitive problems. In RutterM. (Ed.), Developmental neuropsychology (pp. 280–329). New York: Guilford Press.
11.
DuPaulG. J., & EckertT. L. (1997). The effects of school-based interventions for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder A meta-analysis. School Psychology Review, 26, 5–27.
12.
DuPaulG.J.RapportM.D., & PerrielloL.M. (1991). Teacher ratings of academic skills: The development of the academic performance rating scale. School Psychology Review, 20(2), 284–300.
13.
DuPaulG. J., & StonerG. (1994). ADHD in the Schools: Assessment and Intervention Strategies. New York: Guilford Press.
14.
FlippoK. F.IngeK. J., & BarcusJ. M. (1995). Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and the community. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
15.
GolanZ. (1998). Developmental disabilities and neuropage virtual superego partnering in the workplace. Unpublished manuscript.
16.
GreenhillL.L.AbikoffH.B.ArnoldL.E.CantwellD.P.ConnersC.K.ElliottG.HechtmanL.HinshawS.P.HozaB.JensenP.S.MarchJ.S.NewcornJ.PelhamW.E.SevereJ.B.SwansonJ.M.VitielloB.WellsK. (1996). Medication treatment strategies in the MTA study: Relevance to clinicians and researchers. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 1306–1313.
17.
GreenhillL.L.SwansonJ.M.VitielloB.DaviesM.ClevengerW.WuM.SevereJ.B.ArnoldL.E.AbikoffH.B.ConnersC.K.ElliottG.HechtmanL.HinshawS.P.HozaB.JensenP.S.KraemerH.C.MarchJ.S.NewcornJ.H.PelhamW.E.WellsK., & WigalT.Determining the best dose of methylphenidate under controlled conditions: Lessons from the MTA titration. Manuscript submitted for publication.
18.
HershN., & TreadgoldL. (1994). Neuropage: The rehabilitation of memory dysfunction by prosthetic memory and cueing. NeuroRehabilitation, 4, 187–197.
19.
Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1990, Pub.L. No. 101-476, (1993).
20.
LynchW. J. (1995). You must remember this: Assistive devices for memory impairment. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 10, 94–97.
RaskindM.H., & HigginsE.L. (1998). Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 27–40.
23.
RichtersJ. E.ArnoldL. E.JensenP. S.AbikoffH.ConnersC.K.GreenhillL.L.HechtmanL.HinshawS.P.PelhamW.E., & SwansonJ.M. (1995). The National Institute of Mental Health collaborative multisite multimodal treatment study of children with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (MTA): Background and rationale. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 987–1000.
SchafferD. (1992a). Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 3.0) Parent Version. New York: Columbia University Press.
26.
SchafferD. (1992b). Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.3) Parent Version. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
Schwab-StoneM.E.SafferD.DulcanM.K.JensenP.S.FisherP.BirdH.R.GoodmanS.H.LaheyB.B.LichtmanJ.H.CaninoG.Rubio-StipecM., & RaeD.S. (1996). Criterion validity of the NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version 2.3 (DISC-2.3). Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35(7), 878–88.
28.
ShafferD.FisherP.LucasC.P.DulcanM.K., & Schwab-StoneM.E. (2000). NIMH diagnostic interview schedule for children version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): Description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 39(1), 28–38.
29.
SwansonJ. (1992). School-based assessments and interventions for ADD students. Irvine, CA: K.C. Publications.
30.
TaylorB. A., & LevinL., (1998). Teaching a student with autism to make verbal initiations: Effects of a tactile prompt. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 651–654.
31.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act (1990). Catalogue No. 850. (Senate Rpt. 100-438). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
32.
VoelkerS. L.CarterR. A.SpragueD. J.GdowskiC. L., & LacharD. (1989). Developmental trends in memory and metamemory in children with Attention Deficit Disorder, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 14, 75–88.
33.
WehmeyerM. L. (1999). Assistive technology and students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14, 48–58.
