Distance education via the World Wide Web is currently being examined as a method to provide special and general education instruction in teacher preparation programs. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of traditional instructional methods in an online learning environment. Results of this study revealed that overall there were no significant differences between learning under the two conditions. That is, student academic outcomes were the same when instruction was delivered in a traditional classroom or through an online learning environment. Some advantage was found to online discussions in contrast to face-to-face discussions. Traditional instructional methods, such as those used in this study, produce similar academic outcomes when delivered through online learning environments. The implications of these results for teacher preparation practice are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AppleGuide [Computer software]. (1994). Apple Computer, Inc.
2.
BlackhurstA. E.HalesR. M., & LahmE. A. (1997). Using an education server software system to deliver special education coursework via the World Wide Web. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13(4), 78–98.
3.
BrownellM.T., & SmithS.W. (1993). Understanding special education teacher attrition: A conceptual model and implications for teacher educators. Teacher Education and Special Education, 16(3), 270–282.
4.
Council for Exceptional Children (Fall, 1998). Integrating technology into the standard curriculum. Research Connections in Special Education, 1–12.
ClarkR. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–459.
7.
DavisJ.OdellM.AbbittJ., & AmosD. (1999). Developing online courses: A comparison of Web-based instruction with traditional instruction. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education, San Diego, CA.
8.
DedeC. (1999). The transformation of distance education to distributed learning. In TRO. [http://129.7.160.78/InTRO.html].
9.
DunlapJ. (1999, April-June). Developing Web-based performance support systems to encourage lifelong learning in the workplace. WebNet Journal, 40–48.
10.
DuchastelP. (1996). Learning Interfaces. In LiaoT. (Ed.) Advanced educational technology: Research issues and future potential. New York: Springer-Verlag.
11.
DuchastelP. (1997). A web-based model for university instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 25, 221–228.
12.
GilletteD. H. (1996). Using electronic tools to promote active learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 67, 59–70
13.
GuideMaker [Computer software]. (1994). Apple Computer, Inc.
14.
HarasimL. (1990). Introduction to online education. In HarasimL. (Ed.), Online Education: Perspectives on a new environment. New York: Praeger.
15.
HiltzS. R. (1986). The “virtual classroom”: Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36(2), 95–104.
16.
HiltzS. R. (1994). Virtual classroom plus video: Technology for educational excellence. Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia [ED 388215].
17.
JaegerG. (1991). Description of a freshman composition class taught completely online by computer and modem hosted on a BBS Spring Fall 1990. Ed, 5, 8–13.
18.
KhanB. H. (1997). Web-based instruction (WBI): What is it and Why is it? In KhanB. (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 5–18). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
19.
LangoneJ.MaloneD. M.SteckerP. M., & GreeneE. (1998). A comparison of traditional classroom instruction and anchored instruction. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 99–109.
20.
LauritzenP., & FriedmanS.J. (1993). Meeting the supply/demand requirements of the individuals with disabilities education act. Teacher Education and Special Education, 16(3), 221–229.
21.
PerkinsD. N. (1996). Foreword: Minds in the hood. In WilsonB. G. (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. v–viii). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
22.
PowerPoint [Computer Software]. (1983-1998). Microsoft Corporation.
23.
PregentR. (1994). Charting your course: How to prepare to teach more effectively. Madison, WI: Magna Publications.
24.
RielM. (1994). Educational change in a technology-rich environment. Journal Of Research On Computing in Education, 26(4), 452–474.
25.
RelanA., & GillaniB. B. (1997). Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: Similarities and differences. In KhanB. A. (Ed.), Web-based instruction (pp. 41–46). Englewood Cliffs NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
26.
RomiszowskiA. J. (1998). New technologies for human resource development: What works; what makes sense? In de Moura CastroC. (Ed.), Education in the information age. New York: Inter-American Development Bank.
27.
SchrumL. (1997). Teaching at a distance: Strategies for successful planning and development. New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
28.
SmithS. J., & JonesE. (1999). Technology infusion: Preparing teachers through web-based cases. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 22, 251–266.
29.
SmithS.J., & SouthernW. T. (1999). The exceptional learner: Preparing all teachers for tomorrow's classroom. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 15(3), 17–23.
30.
SpoonerF.SpoonerM.AlgozzineB., & JordanL. (1998). Distance education and special education: Promises, practices, and potential pitfalls. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 121–131.
31.
Statistical package for the social sciences 6.1.1 [Computer software]. (1999). SPSS, Inc.
32.
ThachE. C., & MurphyK. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research And Development, 43(1), 57–79.
