Throughout the country, school teams increasingly are adopting culturally sensitive family-centered practices in planning for assistive technology (AT) for children with disabilities. Over the past two decades evolving research has revealed the importance of considering family and cultural issues when planning AT interventions for children with disabilities and their families. This paper presents an overview of selected family and cultural issues, and suggests ongoing questions. The potential for interactive multimedia in helping teams and families make AT decisions is reviewed. The paper concludes with a description of a newly available interactive CD-ROM designed to provide to both families and professionals basic information on augmentative and alternative communication decision-making, including an overview of relevant family and cultural issues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AinsaP. A.MurphyD.ThouvenelleS., & WrightJ. L. (1994). Family involvement: Family choices at school and home. In WightJ. L. & ShadeD. D. (Eds.), Young children: Active learners in a technological age (pp. 121–131). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
2.
AmbronS., & HooperK. (Eds.) (1990). Learning with interactive multimedia: developing and using multimedia tools in education. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.
3.
AngeloD. H. (1997). AAC in the family and home. In GlennenS. & DeCosteD. (Eds.), The handbook of augmentative communication (pp. 523–545). San Diego: Singular.
4.
AngeloD. H.JonesS. D., & KokoskaS. M. (1995). A family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of young children. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 11, 193–201.
5.
AngeloD. H.KokoskaS. M., & JonesS. D. (1996). Family perspective on augmentative and alternative communication: Families of adolescents and young adults. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 12, 13–20.
6.
BataviaA. I., & HammerG. S. (1990). Toward the development of consumer-based criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 27, 425–436.
7.
BataviaA. I.DillardD., & PhillipsB. (n.d.). How to avoid technology abandonment. Washington, DC: Request Rehabilitation Engineering Center, National Rehabilitation Hospital.
8.
BattleD. E. (1993). Communication disorders in multicultural populations. Boston: Andover Medical Publishers.
9.
BeaverK. A., & MannW. C. (1994). Provider skills for delivering computer access services: An assistive technology team approach. Technology and Disability, 3, 109–116.
10.
BehrmannM. M. (1995). Assistive technology training. In FlippoK. F.IngeK. J., & BarcusJ. M. (Eds.), Assistive technology: A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 211–222). Baltimore: Brookes.
11.
BowserG. & ReedP. (1995). Education tech points for assistive technology planning. Journal of Special Education Technology, 12, 4, 325–338.
12.
BradleyR. H.ParetteH. P., & VanBiervlietA. (1995). Families of technology-dependent children and the social worker. Social Work in Health Care, 21(1), 23–37.
13.
BrewerJ.DardaillerD., & VanderheidenG. (1998). Toolkit for promoting web accessibility. In California State University-Northridge 98 Papers. [On-line]. Available at: http:/www.dinf.org/csun_98/csun98_057.htm.
14.
BrinkerR. P.SeiferR., & SameroffA. J. (1994). Relations among maternal stress, cognitive development, and early intervention in middle- and low-SES infants with developmental disabilities. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 98, 463–480.
15.
BrodyS. J., & RuffG. (1986). Aging and rehabilitation: Advances in the state of the art. New York: Springer.
16.
CareyD. M., & SaleP. (1994). Practical considerations in the use of technology to facilitate the inclusion of students with severe disabilities. Technology and Disability, 3, 77–86.
Center for Universal Design. (2000). Principles of universal design. [On-line]. Available at: http://www.design.ncsu.edu/cud/
21.
CharpS. (1996). Home/school connectivity. T.H. E. Journal, 23(11), 4.
22.
CobbH. C., & ReeveR. E. (1991). Counseling approaches with parents and families. In FineM. J. (Ed.), Collaboration with parents of exceptional children (pp. 129–143). Brandon, VT: Clinical Psychology Publishing.
23.
CovingtonG. A. (1998). Cultural and environmental barriers to assistive technology. Why assistive devices don't always assist. In GrayD. B.QuatranoL. A., & LiebermanM. L. (Eds.), Designing and using assistive technology. The human perspective (pp. 77–88). Baltimore: Brookes.
24.
DarlingR. B., & BaxterC. (1996). Families in focus. Sociological methods in early intervention. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
25.
Department of Defense (1990). Effectiveness and cost of interactive videodisc instruction in defense training and education. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analysis.
26.
DererK.PolsgroveL., & ReithH. (1996). A survey of assistive technology applications in schools and recommendations for practice. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 62–80.
27.
DunstC. J., & PagetK. D. (1991). Parent-professional partnerships and family empowerment In FineM. (Ed.), Collaborative involvement with parents of exceptional children (pp. 25–44). Brandon, VTClinical Psychology Publishing.
28.
FordB. L.ObiakarF. E., & PattonJ. M. (Eds.) (1995). Effective education of African American exceptional learners. New perspectives. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
29.
GiacquintaJ. B., & LaneP. A. (1990). Fifty-one families with computers: A study of children's academic uses of microcomputers at home. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(2), 27–37.
HourcadeJ. J.ParetteH. P., & HuerM. B. (1997). Family and cultural alert! Considerations in assistive technology assessment. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(1), 40–44.
32.
HuerM. B. (1997). Culturally inclusive assessments for children using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). The Journal of Children's Communication Development, 19(1), 23–34.
33.
HuerM. B., & LloydL. (1990). AAC users' perspectives on augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 6, 242–249.
34.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1991, P. L. 102-119, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
35.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, P.L. 101-476, 20 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.
36.
IngeK. J., & ShepherdJ. (1995). Assistive technology applications and strategies for school system personnel. In FlippoK. F.IngeK. J., & BarcusJ. M. (Eds.), Assistive technology. A resource for school, work, and community (pp. 133–166). Baltimore: Brookes.
JudgeS. L., & ParetteH. P. (1998). Assistive technology decision-making strategies. In JudgeS. L., & ParetteH. P. (Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services (pp. 127–147). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
LuborskyM. R. (1993). Sociocultural factors shaping technology usage. Fulfilling the promise. Technology and Disability, 2, 71–78.
41.
LynchE. W., & HansonM. J. (1992a). (Eds.). Developing cross-cultural competence. A guide for working with young children and their families. Baltimore: Brookes.
42.
LynchE. W., & HansonM. J. (1992b). Steps in the right direction. In LynchE. W. & HansonM. J. (Eds.), Developing cross cultural competence. A guide for working with young children and their families (pp. 355–370). Baltimore: Brookes.
43.
McGonigelM. J., & GarlandC. W. (1988). The individualized family service plan and the early intervention team: Team and family issues and recommended practices. Infants and Young Children, 1(1), 10–21.
44.
MunschenckN. A., & FoleyR. M. (1995). Collaborative relationships between school and home: Implications for service delivery. Preventing School Failure, 39(1), 16–20.
45.
NahmiasM. L. (1995). Communication and collaboration between home and school for students with ADD. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30(4), 241–247.
46.
National Council on Disability. (2000). Back to school on civil rights: Advancing the federal commitment to leave no child behind. Washington, DC: Author. [On-line]. Available: http://www.ncd.gov/publications/backtoschool_1.html
ParetteH. P. (1995). Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) assessment and prescriptive practices for young children with disabilities: Preliminary examination of state practices. Technology and Disability, 4, 215–231.
49.
ParetteH. P. (1997). Assistive technology devices and services. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 32, 267–280.
50.
ParetteH. P. (1998). Cultural issues and family-centered assistive technology decision-making. In JudgeS. L., & ParetteH. P. (Eds.), Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide to providing family-centered services (pp. 184–210). Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
51.
ParetteP. (1999). Transition planning with families across cultures. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 22(2), 213–231.
52.
ParetteH. P., & AngeloD. H. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication impact on families: Trends and future directions. The Journal of Special Education, 10 (1), 77–98.
53.
ParetteH. P., & BrothersonM. J. (1996). Family participation in assistive technology assessment for young children with disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, 31(1), 29–43.
54.
ParetteH. P.BrothersonM. J.HogeD. R., & HostetlerS. A. (1996, December). Family-centered augmentative and alternative communication issues: Implications across cultures. Paper presented to the International Early Childhood Conference on Children with Special Needs, Phoenix, AZ.
55.
ParetteH. P.BrothersonM. J.HourcadeJ. J., & BradleyR. H. (1996). Family-centered assistive technology assessment. Intervention in School and Clinic, 32(2), 104–112.
56.
ParetteH. P.BrothersonM. J., & HuerM. B. (in press). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities.
57.
ParetteH. P., & HourcadeJ. J. (1997). Family issues and assistive technology needs: A sampling of state practices. Journal of Special Education Technology, 13, 27–43.
58.
ParetteH. P., & HourcadeJ. J. (in press). Assistive technology training for parents of students with disabilities. Special Education Technology Practice.
59.
ParetteH. P.HourcadeJ. J., & VanBiervlietA. (1993). Selection of appropriate technology for children with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 25(3), 18–22.
60.
ParetteH. P., & VanBiervlietA. (1990). Assistive technology and disabilities. A guide for parents and students. Little Rock: UALR Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 364 026)
61.
ParetteH. P., & VanBiervlietA. (1991a). Assistive technology curriculum: A module of inservice for professionals [and] instructor's supplement. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas at Little Rock. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service ED 324 887)
62.
ParetteH. P., & VanBiervlietA. (1991b). Assistive technology guide for young children with disabilities. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas at Little Rock. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 324 888)
63.
ParetteH. P., & VanBiervlietA. (1991c). Assistive technology curriculum for parents of Arkansans with disabilities. Little Rock, AR: University of Arkansas at Little Rock. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service, ED 324 885)
64.
ParetteH. P.VanBiervlietA.ReynaJ. W.HeissererD.StumbergJ.AngeloD. H.BlackstoneS. W.GlennenS. L., & Myers-JenningsC. C. (1999). CD-ROM knowledge base. In ParetteP.VanBiervlietA.ReynaJ. W., & HeissererD. (Eds.), Families, culture, and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). A multimedia instructional program for related service personnel and family members (pp. 44–189). (on-line). Source: http://cstl.semo.edu/parette/homepage/database.pdf
65.
PhillipsB. (n.d.). Technology abandonment: From the consumer point of view. Washington, DC: REquest Rehabilitation Engineering Center, National Rehabilitation Hospital.
66.
ReedP., & BowserG. (1998, December). Education tech points: A framework of assistive technology planning and systems change in schools. Paper presented to the 14th Annual International Conference, Technology and Persons with Disabilities, Los Angeles, CA.
67.
RogersE. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
68.
Roseberry-McKibbinC. (1995). Multicultural students with special language needs. Oceanside, CA: Academic Communication.
69.
SimpsonR. L. (1996). Working with parents and families of exceptional children and youth (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
70.
Smith-LewisM. (1992). What is mental retardation? Perceptions from the African American community. Unpublished manuscript. Hunter College, New York.
71.
SotoG.HuerM. B., & TaylorO. (1997). Multicultural issues. In LloydL. L.FullerD. H., & ArvidsonH. H. (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 406–413). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
72.
TaylorO. L. (1994). Multicultural issues in augmentative and alternative communication. Miniseminar presented by BuzolichM.HarrisO.LloydL.SotoG., & TaylorO. L. at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual Convention, New Orleans, LA.
73.
Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988, P. L. 100-407, 29 U.S.C. 2201 et seq.
74.
TrivetteC.DealA., & DunstC. (1986). Family needs, sources of support, and professional roles: Critical elements of family systems assessment and intervention. Diagnostique, 11, 246–267.
75.
TurnbullA. P., & TurnbullH. R. (1985). Parents speak out: Then and now. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
76.
University of Kentucky. (2000). Quality indicators for assistive technology. [listserv] Available: QIAT@LSV.UKY.EDU
77.
VanBiervlietA. (1994). Accessibility considerations and solutions for hypermedia and instructional program design. In MurphyH. (Ed.), 1994-Technology and persons with disabilities (pp. XX–XX). Northridge, CA: California State University.
VanBiervlietA., & ParetteH. P. (1999). Families, cultures, and AAC (CD-ROM). Little Rock, AR: Southeast Missouri State University and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. (Developed and distributed as part of funded U.S.D.E. Contract No. H029K50072.)
80.
WehmeyerM. L. (1999). Assistive technology and students with mental retardation: Utilization and barriers. Journal of Special Education Technology, 14, 48–58.
81.
WillisW. (1992). Families with African American roots. In LynchE. W. & HansonM. J. (Eds.), Developing cross cultural competence. A guide for working with young children and their families (pp. 121–150). Baltimore: Brookes.
ZabalaJ. (1995). The SETT framework: Critical issues to consider when making informed assistive technology decisions. ERIC Document Reproduction Service (No. ED381 962).
