There may be many other teachers who are in the same situation as I am: trying to meet the needs of the high-ability student within the regular education classroom. In this paper, I present an action research project outlining the steps I took on an issue of importance to me and my students. Four techniques were shown to be useful: differentiated instruction, student choice, flexible groupings, and mixing enrichment with acceleration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FeldhusenJ. (1996). How to identify and develop special talents. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 66–69.
2.
RossP. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
3.
ShevinSapon M. (1996). Beyond gifted education: Building a shared agenda for school reform. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 194–214.
4.
TomlinsonC. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in the middle school: One school's journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 77–87.
5.
WillisS. (1995). Mainstreaming the gifted. Education Update. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 37(2), 3–5.
6.
ColemanM. R.GallagherJ. J. (1995). Middle schools and their impact on talent development. Middle School Journal, 27, 47–56.
7.
DelisleJ. (1994). Top ten statements that should never again be made by advocates of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 34–35, 42.
GallagherJ. T.ColemanM. R.NelsonS. (1995). Perceptions of educational reform by educators representing middle schools and gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 66–72.
10.
GubbinsE. J. (1994 Spring). Exemplary school programs in gifted education. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, pp. 6–10.
11.
LassondeMacKay C. (1994 May). Butterflies, not pigeonholes. Chemtech, 21–23.
12.
ParkeB. (1992). Challenging gifted students in the regular classroom. ERIC Digest #E513 (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED 352 774).
13.
PendarvisE.HowleyA. (1996). Playing fair: The possibilities of gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 215–233.
14.
RenzulliJ. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
15.
TomlinsonC. (1994). Report from the National Association for Gifted Children Task Force on the interface between gifted education and general education. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
16.
TreffingerD.FeldhusenJ. (1996). Talent recognition and development: Successor to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 181–193.
17.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1992). Developing learner outcomes for gifted students. ERIC Digest #E514 (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 352 775).
18.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1992). Educational decision making on acceleration and grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 68–72.
