In this response to Professor Françoys Gagné's challenging paper, I take issue with his distinction between natural abilities and systematically developed abilities–and thus his distinction between giftedness and talent–arguing that the distinction lacks meaningfulness and utility. I then question the practicability and the value of the larger enterprise of attempting to reach consensus on the meaning of these elusive concepts. I argue that not only is our lack of agreement as to the meanings of the terms giftedness and talent inevitable but that it is conceivably a good that in no way poses a practical limitation on our practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerlinI. (1990). The crooked timber of humanity: Chapters in the history of ideas.London: Fontana Press.
2.
BorlandJ. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted.New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
BorlandJ. H. (1996). Gifted education and the threat of irrelevance.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,19, 129–147.
4.
BorlandJ. H. (1997). The construct of giftedness.Peabody journal of Education,7, 6–20.
5.
CattellR. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment,journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1–22.
6.
ChambersJ. (1985). Milestones: The music and times of Miles Davis.Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
7.
FeldmanD. H. (1991). Nature's gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential.New York: Teachers College Press.
8.
GagnéF. (1999). My convictions about the nature of abilities, gifts, and talents,journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 109–136.
9.
GardnerJ. W. (1961). Excellence: Can we be equal and excellent too?New York: Harper Brothers.
10.
GrayJ. (1996). Isaiah Berlin.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
11.
HornJ. L. (1985). Remodeling old models of intelligence: Gf-Gc theory. In WolmanB. B. (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence (pp. 267–300). New York: Wiley.
12.
TannenbaumA. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives.New York: Macmillan.
13.
WilsonE. O. (1998). Consilience. The unity of knowledge.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
