Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Recent reports on the existence and nature of educational programs for gifted learners have indicated that current educational practices in gifted education vary in both availability and quality. One such report, National Excellence: A Case for Developing America's Talent (U.S. Department of Education, U.S. DOE, 1993), identified critical issues and established 7 initiatives for the improvement of the education of gifted students. This study examined the nature and availability of state legislative and policy provisions for gifted students as well as state efforts to address the report's 7 initiatives. Results indicated that progress in state efforts on the 7 initiatives have been mixed, with significant gains in some areas contrasted by minimal or no progress in others. Gains in gifted education, however, occurred at the same time that legislation and policy mandates in gifted education decreased.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Callahan

(1992). Determining the effectiveness of educational services: Assessment issues. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 344 416).

Coleman

M. R.

Gallagher

J. J.

(1992). Report on state policies related to the identification of gifted students. Chapel Hill, NC: Gifted Education Policy Studies Program, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted (1994). The 1994 state of the states gifted and talented education report. Austin, TX: Author.

Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted (1996). The 1996 state of the states gifted and talented education report. Austin, TX: Author.

Cox

Daniel

Boston

(1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Fetterman

D. M.

(1988). Excellence and equality. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Ford

D. Y.

Russo

C. J.

Harris

J. J.

(1994). Meeting the educational needs of the gifted: A legal imperative. Roeper Review, 17, 224–228.

Hanby

D. M.

Badiali

B. J.

(1994). Fairfield City School District's gifted and talented program: A collaborative evaluation study (1978–1994). Fairfield, OH: Fairfield City School District. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 373 473).

Karnes

F. A.

Whorton

J. E.

(1991). Teacher certification and endorsement in gifted education: Past, present, and future. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 148–150.

10.

MacRae

Lupart

J. L.

(1991). Issues in identifying gifted students: How Renzulli's model stacks up. Roeper Review, 14(2), 53–58

11.

Milgram

R. M.

(1989). Teaching gifted and talented learners in regular classrooms. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

12.

Plowman

P. D.

(1987, August). The rise and demise of gifted education in California. Paper presented at the Seventh World Conference on Gifted and Talented Children, Salt Lake City, UT. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 298 753).

13.

Rhodes

(1992). Pocusing attention on the individual in identification of gifted black students. Roeper Review, 14(3), 108–110

14.

Richert

E. S.

(1987). Rampant problems and promising practices in the identification of disadvantaged gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 135–137.

15.

Stile

Hudson

(1993). Early intervention with children who are gifted: DEC recommended practices. Council for Exceptional Children, Division for Early Childhood. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370 268).

16.

Stinespring

J. A.

(1991). The quest to find an alternative way to identify artistic talent in black students. Roeper Review, 14(2), 59–62

17.

U.S. Department of Education (U.S. DOE). (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: Author.

18.

Whitmore

J. R.

(1988). Educational reform and gifted education: From the perspective of a dean. Roeper Review, 10, 197–200.

19.

Zirkel

P. A.

Stevens

P. L.

(1987). The law concerning public education of gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 305–322.

A National Survey of Current Legislative and Policy Trends in Gifted Education: Life after the National Excellence Report

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References