The purpose of this study was to determine (a) whether teachers' perceptions on the characteristics of gifted students in general differed from their perceptions of gifted students classified as Hispanic limited English proficient (LEP) and (b) whether these perceptions differed based on the teachers' ethnic backgrounds. There were 373 teachers from nine elementary schools in Dade County, Florida, who completed a 34-item Likert-type survey. Randomly, one-half of the teachers in each school received the survey labeled “Gifted Hispanic LEP,” and the other half received the survey labeled “Gifted.” Significant differences were found in responses by survey group and by ethnicity, and no significant interaction was found between group and ethnicity. Both survey groups perceived a similar order of importance for the characteristics. However, relative importance differed significantly in language-related items. There were also significant differences between the groups in the degree to which they rated the characteristics as important.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adderholdt-ElliotM.AlgozzineK.AlgozzineB.HaneyK. (1991). Current state practices in educating students who are gifted and talented. Roeper Review, 14(1), 20–23
2.
AwanborD. (1991). Teachers and their gifted children in the classrooms: A perceptual analysis. Gifted Education International, 7(2), 82–84
3.
Bar-TalD.RavivA.AradM. (1989). Effects of information on student-teachers' stereotypic perception of pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 143–154.
4.
BermúdezA. B.RakowS. J. (1990). Analyzing teachers' perceptions of identifying procedures for gifted and talented Hispanic limited English proficient (LEP) students at-risk. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 7, 21–33.
5.
BermúdezA. B.RakowS. J.MárquezJ.SawyerC. (1991). Meeting the needs of the gifted and talented limited English proficient student: The UHCL prototype. Paper presented at the National Association for Bilingual Education, Washington, DC.
6.
BernalE. M.Jr. (1974). Gifted Mexican American children: An ethno-scientific perspective. California Journal of Educational Research, 25, 261–273.
7.
BernalE. M.Jr. (1976). Gifted programs for the culturally different. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 69, 67–76.
8.
BusseT. V.DahmeG.WagnerH.WieczerkowskiW. (1986). Teacher perceptions of highly gifted students in the United States and West Germany. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 55–60.
9.
CollierV. P. (1989). How long? A synthesis of research on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 309–331.
10.
DayJ. C. (1993). Population projections of the United States by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin: 1993 to 2050 (U.S. Bureau of the Census, Current Population Reports, P25–1104). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
11.
DunnR.GriggsS. (1990). Research on the learning style characteristics of selected racial and ethnic groups. Reading, Writing and Learning Disabilities, 6, 261–280.
12.
FeldhusenJ. F.JarwanF. A. (1993). Gifted and talented youth for educational programs. In HellerK. A.MönksF. J.PassowA. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 233–251). Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon.
13.
FernándezA. T. (1995). Perceptions of elementary teachers on the characteristics of gifted students in general versus gifted Hispanic limited English proficient students (Doctoral Dissertation, Florida International University, 1995). Dissertation Abstracts International, 5612A, 1–216.
14.
FernandezR. M.NielsenF. (1986). Bilingualism and Hispanic scholastic achievement: Some baseline results. Social Science Research, 15, 43–70.
15.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
16.
GardnerH. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.
17.
GonzalezV.YawkeyT. (1993, Fall). The assessment of culturally and linguistically different students: Celebrating change. Education Horizons, 41–49.
GuskinS. L.PengC. J.SimonM. (1992). Do teachers react to “multiple intelligences”? Effects of teachers' stereotypes on judgments and expectancies for students with diverse pattern of gifts/talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 32–37.
20.
GuttmannJ.Bar-TalD. (1982). Stereotypic perceptions of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 519–528.
21.
HanyE. A. (1993). Methodological problems and issues concerning identification. In HellerK. A.MönksF. J.PassowA. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of gifts and talent (pp. 209–232). Oxford, U.K.: Pergamon Press.
22.
KitanoM. K. (1991). A multicultural educational perspective on serving the culturally diverse gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 4–19.
23.
MárquezJ. A.BermúdezA. B.RakowS. J. (1992). Incorporating community perceptions in the identification of gifted and talented Hispanic students. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 10, 117–130.
24.
McKenzieJ. A. (1986). The influence of identification practices, race, and SES on the identification of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 93–95.
25.
MeleskyT. J. (1985). Identifying and providing for the Hispanic gifted child. NABE Journal, 9, 43–56.
26.
MoraL. G. (1994). Limited English proficiency: A growing and costly educational challenge facing many school districts. Report to the chairman, Committee on Labor and Human Resources (Report No. GAO/HEHS-94-38). Washington, DC: United States General Accounting Office.
27.
PetersonJ. S.MargolinL. (1997). Naming gifted children: An example of unintended “reproduction.”Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 82–101.
28.
PrietoA. G.ZuckerS. H. (1981). Teacher perception of race as a factor in the placement of behaviorally disordered children. Behavioral Disorders, 7, 34–38.
29.
RenzulliJ. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–185.
30.
RobinsonN. M.DaleP. S.LandesmanS. (1990). Validity of Stanford-Binet IV with linguistically precocious toddlers. Intelligence, 14, 173–186.
31.
SchackG. D.StarkoA. J. (1990). Identification of gifted students: An analysis of criteria preferred by preservice teachers, classroom teachers, and teachers of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 346–363.
32.
SingerE. M.HoutzJ. C.RosenfieldS. (1992). Teacher-identified characteristics of successful gifted students: A Delphi study. Educational Research Quarterly, 15, 5–14.
33.
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (1986). Conceptions of gifted: A map of the terrain. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, U.K.: University of Cambridge Press.
34.
TobiasJ.ColeC.ZibrinM.BodlakovaV. (1982). Teacher-student ethnicity and recommendation for special education referrals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 72–76.
35.
TorranceE. P. (1979). Unique needs of the creative child and adult. In PassowA. H. (Ed.), The gifted and the talented: Their education and development: The seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 352–371). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36.
ZuckerS. H.PrietoA. G. (1977). Ethnicity and teacher bias in educational decisions. Instructional Psychology, 4, 2–5.
