In today's information age, it is increasingly important to help learners develop higher order thinking skills as well as a flexible knowledge base. Research in cognitive science and education suggests that both of these aims can be achieved by having students learn through solving problems. Problem-based learning (PBL), with its emphasis on both strategies and content, is particularly well suited to achieving these aims. In PBL, student learning begins with a problem to be solved and includes cycles of reflection on the problem-solving experience. This paper will discuss the tutorial process in PBL and how it can be used to cultivate higher order thinking skills.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BarrowsH. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for the preclinical years. New York: Springer.
3.
BarrowsH. S. (1988). The tutorial process. Springfield: Southern Illinois University.
4.
BarrowsH. S.KelsonA. C. (1995). Problem-based learning in secondary education and the Problem-Based Learning Institute (Monograph 1). Springfield, IL: Problem-Based Learning Institute.
5.
BereiterC. (1994). Constructivism, socioculturalism, and Popper's world 3. Educational Research (7), 21–23.
6.
BereiterC.ScardamaliaM. (1996, August–September). Beyond Bloom's taxonomy: Rethinking knowledge for the knowledge age. Paper presented at the Piaget Centennial Conference, “The Growing Mind,”Geneva, Switzerland.
7.
BlumenfeldP. C.MarxR. W.SolowayE.KrajcikJ. S. (1996). Learning with peers: From small group cooperation to collaborative communities. Educational Researcher, 25(8), 37–40.
8.
BorkowskiJ. G.PeckV. A. (1986). Causes and consequences of metamemory in gifted children. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 182–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Bouffard-BouchardT.ParentS.LarivéeS. (1993). Self-regulation on a concept-formation task among average and gifted students. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 115–134.
10.
BrownA. L. (1995). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4–12.
11.
BrownA. L.AshD.RutherfordM.NakagawaK.GordonA.CampioneJ. C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In SalomonG. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 188–228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BruerJ. T. (1993). Schools for thought. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
13.
ChanL. K. S. (1996). Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 184–193.
14.
ChiM. T. H.BassokM.LewisM. W.ReimannP.GlaserR. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182.
15.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). From visual word problems to learning communities: Changing conceptions of cognitive research. In McGillyK. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 157–200). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press/Bradford Books.
16.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.NewmanS. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
DeGraveW. S.BoshuizenH. P. A.SchmidtH. G. (1996). Problem-based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysis. Instructional Science, 24, 321–341.
18.
DeweyJ. (1933). How we think (Rev. ed.). Boston: Heath.
19.
DodsR. F. (1997). An action research study of the effectiveness of problem-based learning in promoting the acquisition and retention of knowledge. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 423–437.
20.
FeldmanD. H. (1993). Beyond universals in cognitive development (2nd ed.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
21.
FerrariM. (1996). Observing the observer: Self-regulation in the observational learning of motor skills. Developmental Review, 16, 203–240.
22.
FerrariM.SternbergR. J. (in press). Mental abilities and styles. In DamonW. (Series Ed.) & KuhnD.SieglerR. (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, & language (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
23.
GallagherS. A.SherB. T.StepienW. J.WorkmanD. (1995). Integrating problem-based learning into the science classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 95, 135–146.
24.
GallagherS.StepienW. (1996). Content acquisition in problem-based learning: Depth versus breadth in American studies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 257–275.
25.
GallagherS. A.StepienW. J.RosenthalH. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195–200.
26.
GertzmanA. D.KolodnerJ. L. (1996). A case study of problem-based learning in a middle school science classroom: Lessons learned. In EdelsonD. C.DomeshekE. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences 96 (pp. 91–98). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
27.
GuzdialM.TurnsJ.RappinN.CarlsonD. (1995). Collaborative support for learning in complex domains. In SchnaseJ. L.CunniusE. L. (Eds.), Computer-supported collaborative learning 1995 (pp. 157–160). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
HmeloC. E. (1995). Problem-based learning: Development of knowledge and reasoning strategies. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 404–408J). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
HmeloC. E.CotéN. C. (1996). The development of self-directed learning strategies in problem-based learning. In EdelsonD. C.DomeshekE. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences 1996 (pp. 421–426). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
30.
HmeloC. E.GuzdialM. (1996). Of black and glass boxes: Scaffolding for learning and doing. In EdelsonD. C.DomeshekE. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences 1996 (pp. 128–134). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
31.
HmeloC. E.HoltonD.GertzmanA. (1997, April). Building artificial lungs: Design-based learning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
32.
HmeloC. E.NarayananN. H.HübscherR.NewstetterW. C.KolodnerJ. L. (1996). A multiple-case-based approach to generative environments for learning. VIVEK: The Indian quarterly of artificial intelligence, 9(1), 2–18.
33.
HmeloC. E.ShikanoT.BrasB.MulhollandJ.RealffM.VanegasJ. (1995). A problem-based course in sustainable technology [CD-ROM]. In BudnyD.HerrickR.BjedovG.PerryJ. B. (Eds.), Frontiers in education 1995. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education.
34.
JacksonN. E.ButterfieldE. C. (1986). A conception of giftedness designed to promote research. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 151–181). New York: Cambridge.
35.
KolodnerJ. L.HmeloC. E.NarayananN. H. (1996). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning. In EdelsonD. C.DomeshekE. A. (Eds.), Proceedings of International Conference of the Learning Sciences 1996 (pp. 188–195). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
36.
KoschmannT. D.MyersA. C.FeltovichP. J.BarrowsH. S. (1994). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 225–262.
37.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
38.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
39.
PeaR. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In SalomonG. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 47–87). New York: Cambridge.
40.
ResnickL. B. (1987). Education and learning to think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41.
ResnickL. B.ResnickD. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In GiffordB. R.O'ConnorM. C. (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement, and instruction (pp. 37–75). Boston: Kluwer.
42.
SalomonG. (1993). No distribution without individual cognition: A dynamic interactional view. In SalomonG. (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 111–138. New York: Cambridge.
43.
SalomonG.PerkinsD. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113–142.
44.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC. (1993/1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 265–284.
45.
Secretary's Commission on Achieving Needed Skills (SCANS). (1991). What work requires of schools: SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
46.
SimonH. A. (1980). Problem solving and education. In TumaD. T.ReifF. (Eds.), Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research (pp. 81–96). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
47.
SpiroR. J.CoulsenR. L.FeltovichP. J.AndersonD. K. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 375–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
SternbergR. J. (1994). Changing conceptions of intelligence and their impact upon the concept of giftedness: The triarchic theory of intelligence. In GenshaftJ. L.BireleyM.HollingerC. L. (Eds.), Serving gifted and talented students (pp. 33–47). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
49.
SternbergR. J.FerrariM.ClinkenbeardP.GrigorenkoE. L. (1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 129–137.
50.
VernonD. T.BlakeR. L. (1993). Does problem-based learning work?: A meta-analysis of evaluative research. Academic Medicine, 68, 550–563.
51.
VyeN. J.GoldmanS. R.VossJ. F.HmeloC.WilliamsS. (in press). Complex math problem solving by individuals and dyads: When and why are two heads better than one?Cognition and Instruction.
52.
WilliamsS. M. (1993). Putting case-based learning into context: Examples from legal, business, and medical education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367–427.
53.
WilliamsS. M.BransfordJ. D.VyeN. J.GoldmanS. R.CarlsonK. (1993, April). Positive and negative effects of specific knowledge on mathematical problem-solving. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual meeting, Atlanta, GA.
54.
ZimmermanB. J.Martinez-PonsM. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.
