Educators of the gifted rationalize offering special curricula for gifted learners based on (a) the nature of the learning environment established for these learners; (b) constructivist principles of content, process, and product; and/or (c) use of a range of instructional strategies associated with programs for gifted learners. General educators find such defenses for gifted education little more than an argument for “good education.” This essay proposes an alternate model of curriculum and instruction suited to advanced learners. Use of such a model should strengthen both educational practice and research focused on talent development in gifted students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrunerJ. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2.
CallahanC. (1997). A critical self-study of gifted education: Healthy practice, necessary evil, or sedition?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 148–163.
3.
ClarkD. (1991). My incomplete agenda for education. In BurlesonD., (Ed.), Reflections: Personal essays by 33 distinguished educators (pp. 52–61). Bloomington, IN: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.
4.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure.New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
KaplanS. (1979). Inservice training manual for developing curriculum for the gifted/talented.Ventura, CA: National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
6.
KulikJ.KulikC. (1991). Ability grouping and gifted students. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 178–196). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
LevinH. (1990, November). Accelerating the progress of ALL students. Paper presented at the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government Educational Policy Seminar, Albany, NY.
8.
MakerC. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted.Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
PassowH. (1982). Differentiated curricula for the gifted/talented: A point of view. In Curricula for the gifted: Selected proceedings of the First National Conference On Curricula For The Gifted And Talented (pp. 4–19). Ventura, CA: National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
11.
PhenixP. (1986). Realms of meaning: A philosophy of the curriculum for general education.Ventura, CA: National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
12.
RenzulliJ. (1988). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 298–309.
13.
RenzulliJ. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school improvement.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
14.
ShulmanL. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 19(2), 4–14.
15.
SylwesterR. (1995). A celebration of neurons: An educator's guide to the human brain.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
16.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (1994). Comprehensive curriculum for the gifted.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
WardV. (1980). Differential education for the gifted.Ventura, CA: National/State Leadership Training Institute on the Gifted and Talented.
