AppleM. W.WeisL. (1986). Seeing education relationally: The stratification of culture and people in the sociology of school knowledge. Journal of Education, 168, 7–34.
2.
BakerE.O'NeilH. F.Jr.LinnR. L. (1994). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 332–353.
3.
BergT. (1980). The smart man's burden. Peabody Journal of Education, 58(1), 31–33.
4.
BledsteinB. J. (1976). The culture of professionalism: The middle class and the development of higher education in America. New York: W. W. Norton.
5.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1973). IQ in the US class structure. Social Policy, Nov–Dec 1972/ Jan-Feb 1973, 65–96.
6.
BowlesS.GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
7.
BravermanH. (1975). Labor and monopoly capitalism: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
8.
ChristophersonS. L. (1981). Developmental placement in the regular school program. G/C/T, 19, 40–41.
9.
CoxJ.DanielN.BostonB. O. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising practices. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
10.
DaurioS. (1979). Educational enrichment versus acceleration. A review of the literature. In GeorgeW.CohnS.StanleyJ. (Eds.), Educating the gifted: Acceleration and enrichment (pp. 13–63). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11.
DirksJ.QuarfothJ. (1981). Selecting children for gifted classes: Choosing for breadth vs. choosing for depth. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 437–449.
12.
FeldmanD. (1979). A follow-up of subjects scoring above 180 IQ in Terman's Genetic Studies of Genius. Exceptional Children, 50, 518–523.
13.
FetlerM. (1989, March). A method for the construction of differentiated school norms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 312 302)
14.
FettermanD. M. (1988). Excellence and equity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15.
FrasierM. (1989). Identification of gifted black students: Developing new perspectives. In MakerC. J.SchieverS. W. (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities: Vol. II (213–225). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
16.
GirouxH. A. (1993). Living dangerously: Multiculturalism and the politics of difference. New York: Peter Lang.
17.
GuilfordJ. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, McGraw-Hill.
18.
HagenE., (1980). Identification of the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.
19.
HerrnsteinR. J.MurrayC. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and the class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
20.
HowleyA. (1986). Gifted education and the spectre of elitism. Journal of Education, 168(1), 117–125.
21.
HowleyC.HowleyA. (1989). Gifted programs: Equal access in rural areas. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 8(4), 3–8.
22.
HowleyC.HowleyA.PendarvisE. (1995). Out of our minds: Anti-intellectualism and talent development in American schooling. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
JencksC.BartlettS.CorcoranM.CrouseJ.EaglesfieldD.JacksonG.McClellandK.MueserP.OlneckM.SchwarzJ.WardS.WilliamsJ. (1979). Who gets ahead? The determinants of economic success in America. New York: Basic Books.
24.
KaminL. J. (1995) Behind the curve. Scientific American, 272(2), 99–103.
25.
KulikC.KulikJ. (1982). Research synthesis on ability grouping. Educational Leadership, 39, 619–621.
26.
KulikJ.KulikC. (1984). Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409–425.
27.
LevineD. O. (1986). The American college and the culture of aspiration, 1915–1940. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
28.
LewontinR. C.RoseS.KaminL. J. (1984). Not in our genes: Biology, ideology, and human nature. New York: Random House.
29.
MargolinL. (1994). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
30.
MercerJ. (1981). The system of multicultural pluralistic assessment: SOMPA. In Balancing the scale for the disadvantaged gifted: Presentations from the fourth biennial national conference on disadvantaged gifted/talented (pp. 29–57). Ventura, CA: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools.
31.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
32.
RenzulliJ. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Wethersfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
33.
RenzulliJ. S. (1978). What makes giftedness?Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184, 261.
34.
RobinsonA. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14(3), 9–27, 31–36.
35.
RuizR. (1989). Considerations in the education of gifted Hispanic students. In MakerC. J.SchieverS. W. (Eds.), Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities: Vol. 1: Critical issues in gifted education (pp. 61–65). Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.
36.
Sapon-ShevinM. (1993). Gifted education and the protection of privilege: Breaking the silence, opening the discourse. In WeisL.FineM. (Eds.), Beyond silenced voices: Class, race, and gender in United States schools (pp. 25–44). Albany: State University of New York Press.
37.
Sapon-ShevinM. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
38.
SchorJ. (1991). The overworked American: The unexpected decline of leisure. New York: Basic Books.
39.
SchwartzL. L. (1994). Why give “gifts” to the gifted?: Investing in a national resource. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
40.
StanleyJ. (1974). Intellectual precocity. In StanleyJ.KeatingD.FoxL. (Eds.), Mathematical talent: Discovery, description, and development (pp. 1–22). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
41.
StanleyJ. C. (1986, April). The urgent need for an academic focus. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 277 205)
42.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
43.
SubotnikR. F.KarpD. E.MorganE. R. (1989). High IQ children at midlife: An investigation into the generalizability of Terman's Genetic Studies of Genius. Roeper Review, 11(3), 139–144.
44.
SubotnikR.KassenL.SummersE.WasserA. (1993). Genius revisited: High IQ children grow up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45.
TermanL. (1925). Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46.
TermanL.OdenM. (1959). The gifted group at mid-life: Vol V: Genetic Studies of Genius. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
47.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. L. (1989). Profiles of precocity: A three-year study of talented adolescents. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners: The home, the self, the school (pp. 29–39). New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
WeilerD. (1978). The alpha children: California's brave new world for the gifted. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 185–187.
49.
WestC. (1993). Keeping faith. New York: Routledge.
50.
WrightE. O. (1979). Class, crisis, and the state. London: Verso.