Beyond Gifted Education: Building a Shared Agenda for School Reform

Abstract

This article explores the ways in which gifted education programs as they are currently defined, designed, and implemented lead schools away from rather than toward broader school reform. The author argues that gifted education programs function as a form of educational triage, providing an excellent education for those students for whom educational failure would not be tolerated while leaving the general educational system untouched and immune from analysis and critique. Educational, political, and economic justifications for gifted education are explored with particular reference to alternative ways to conceptualize the debate and the response so that the needs of all students are addressed. Consequences for teachers, students, and society of implementing gifted programs are discussed. Some of the key issues critical to the reexamination of the gifted construct are then explored, including: silence, the pain of gifted students, characteristics of appropriate differentiation, the fear of abandonment of gifted students, the excellence/equity debate, and the possibilities of wide-scale reform. The article concludes with an elaboration of research and policy agendas that could move the educational system forward and avoid positioning school reform advocates, gifted education proponents, and full inclusion supporters in opposition to one another.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Darling-Hammond

(1993). Reframing the school reform agenda: Developing capacity for school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(10), 743–761.

Delisle

J. R.

(1984). Gifted children speak out. New York: Walker.

Derber

(1995). The politics of triage: The contract with America's surplus populations. Tikkun, 10(3), 37–43; 86–88.

George

(1992). How to untrack your school. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Heritage Foundation. (1984). The crisis: Washington shares the blame. The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder. Washington, DC: Author.

Kozol

(1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.

Marland

S. P.

Jr. (1971). Education of the gifted and talented (2 Vols.). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Massachusetts Advocacy Center (1990). Locked in/locked out: Tracking and placement practices in Boston public schools. Boston: Author.

Oakes

(1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

10.

Pugach

M. C.

(1988). Special education as a constraint on teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(3), 52–59.

11.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1994/95). Teachers as talent scouts. Educational Leadership, 52(4), 75–81.

12.

Sapon-Shevin

(1984). The tug of war that nobody wins: Allocation of educational resources for handicapped, gifted, and typical students. Curriculum Inquiry, 14(1), 57–81.

13.

Sapon-Shevin

(1987). Giftedness as a social construct. Teachers College Record, 89(1), 39–53.

14.

Sapon-Shevin

(1990). Gifted education and the deskilling of classroom teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(1), 39–48.

15.

Sapon-Shevin

(1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany: State University of New York Press.

16.

Schroeder-Davis

(1994). With malice toward some: A review of Mara Sapon-Shevin's Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 8(4), 2–7.

17.

Sizer

(1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

18.

Stainback

(1990). Support networks for inclusive schooling: Interdependent integrated education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

19.

Villa

R. A.

Thousand

J. S.

Stainback

(Eds.). (1992). Restructuring for caring and effective education. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

20.

Wheelock, A. [For the Massachusetts Advocacy Center]. (1992). Crossing the tracks: How “untracking” can save America's schools. New York: The New Press.