Eminent individuals are those who have made a great and lasting contribution to their society. The idea that “genius is akin to madness” has dominated in conceptions of eminence throughout the ages. However, contemporary views of the relationship between eminence and emotional stability based on studies of distinguished individuals assume that mental instability is incompatible with the prolonged and goal-directed effort required in achievement of great social value. The divergence of perspective has arisen from differences in the professional biases of the medical and nonmedical professions, the difficulty of distinguishing between normal and abnormal behaviors, and the diversity of effects on individual functioning that may accrue from mental illness. The issue of emotional stability is examined from the perspective of childhood giftedness as a precursor to development of eminence, and implications are drawn for the education of gifted and talented children.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertR. S. (1969). The concept of genius and its implications for the study of creativity and giftedness. American Psychologist, 24, 743–753.
2.
AlbertR. S. (1980). Family positions and the attainment of eminence: A study of special family positions and special family experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(2), 87–95.
3.
AlbertR. S. (1983). Exceptional creativity and achievement. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 19–35). New York: Pergamon.
4.
AlbertR. S. (1991). People, processes, and developmental paths to eminence: A developmental-interactional model. In MilgramR. M. (Ed.), Counselling gifted and talented children: A guide for teachers, counsellors and parents (pp. 75–93). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
AlbertR. S. (1992a). A developmental theory of eminence. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp. 3–18). New York: Pergamon.
6.
AlbertR. S. (1992b). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp. 59–75). New York: Pergamon.
7.
AlbertR. S.RuncoM. A. (1986). The achievement of eminence: A model based on a longitudinal study of exceptionally gifted boys and their families. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of Giftedness (pp. 332–357). London: Cambridge University Press.
8.
ArchambaultF. X.WestbergK. L.BrownS. W.HallmarkB. W.ZhangW.EmmonsC. L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103–119.
9.
BambergerJ. (1982). Growing up prodigies: The midlife crisis. In FeldmanD. (Ed.), Developmental approaches to giftedness and creativity [pp. 61–77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10.
BarronF. (1992). Creative writers. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp. 315–324). Oxford: Pergamon.
11.
BeckerG. (1978). The mad genius controversy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
BidlackG. H. (1983). Unlikely beginnings. Roslyn Heights, NY: Libra.
13.
BloomB. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
14.
BlumJ. D. (1978). On changes in psychiatric diagnosis over time. American Psychologist, 33, 1017–1031.
15.
BrussellE. E. (Ed.). (1970). Dictionary of quotable definitions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
16.
BullB. L. (1985). Eminence and precocity: An examination of the justification of education for the gifted and talented. Teachers College Record, 87(1), 1–19.
17.
CattellJ. M. (1903). A statistical study of eminent men. Popular Science Monthly, 62, 359–377.
18.
ClaridgeG. (1992). Great wits and madness. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp. 329–350). Oxford: Pergamon.
19.
ClarkB. (1992). The need for a range of program options for gifted and talented students. In StainbackW.StainbackS. (Eds.), Controversial issues confronting special education (pp. 57–67). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
CoxC. M. (1926). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 2. The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
21.
CoxC. M. (1992). The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp. 53–58). New York: Pergamon.
22.
CsikszentmihalyiM. C. (1992). Motivation and creativity. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp. 19–33). New York: Pergamon.
23.
DaleP. M. (1952). Medical biographies: The ailments of thirty-three famous persons. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
24.
DudekS. Z.HallW. B. (1992). Personality consistency: Eminent architects 25 years later. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp.303–314). Oxford: Pergamon.
25.
EidusonB. T. (1983). Early influences on research scientists. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 182–202). Oxford: Pergamon.
26.
EllisH. (1904). A study of British genius. London: Constable.
27.
FeldmanD. H. (1979). The mysterious case of extreme giftedness. In PassowA. H. (Ed.), The gifted and the talented (The 78th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 334–352). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
FeldmanD. H.BenjaminA. C. (1986). Giftedness as a developmentalist sees it. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 285–305). London: Cambridge University Press.
29.
FeldmanD. H.GoldsmithL. (1986). Nature's gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Basic.
30.
FowlerW. (1986). Early experiences of great men and women mathematicians. In FowlerW. (Ed.), Early experience and the development of competence: No 32, New directions for child development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
GaltonF. (1869). Hereditary genius. New York: Macmillan.
32.
GardnerH. (1991). The unschooled mind. New York: Basic.
33.
GardnerH. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic.
34.
GoertzelM. G.GoertzelV.GoertzelT. G. (1978). 300 eminent personalities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
35.
GoertzelV.GoertzelM. G. (1962). Cradles of eminence. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
36.
GoldsmithL. (1987). Girl prodigies: Some evidence and some speculations. Roeper Review, 10(2), 74–82.
37.
GouldS. J. (1981). The mismeasure of man. New York: W. W. Norton.
38.
GrantV. W. (1968). Great abnormals. New York: Hawthorn.
39.
GrinderR. E. (1985). The gifted in our midst: By their divine deeds, neuroses, and mental test scores we have known them. In HorowitzF.O'BrienM. (Eds.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (pp. 5–35). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
40.
GrinderR. E. (1990). Sources of giftedness in nature and nurture: Historical origins of enduring controversies. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(2), 50–55.
41.
HelsonR. (1983). Creative mathematicians. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 311–330). Oxford: Pergamon.
42.
HoweM. J. A. (1990). The origins of exceptional abilities. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
43.
HowleyA. (1987). The symbolic role of eminence in the education of gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 115–124.
44.
KaplanS. N. (1986). Qualitatively differentiated curricula. In MakerC. J. (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted (pp. 121–134). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
45.
KarlssonJ. L. (1978). Inheritance of creative intelligence. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
46.
KeehnJ. D. (Ed.). (1987). Creativity and madness. Ottawa: University Press of Canada.
47.
Lange-EichbaumW. (1932). The problem of genius. New York: Macmillan.
48.
LombrosoC. (1910). The man of genius. New York: Walter Scott Publishing.
49.
MacKinnonD. W. (1978). In search of human effectiveness. Buffalo: Creative Education Foundation.
50.
MacKinnonD. W. (1983). Creative architects. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 291–301). Oxford: Pergamon.
51.
MakerC. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
52.
MakerC. J. (1983). Teaching models in education of the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
53.
MartindaleC. (1972). Father absence, psychology, and poetic eminence. Psychological Reports, 31, 843–847.
54.
McMurdyH. G. (1983). The childhood pattern of genius. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 155–169). New York: Pergamon.
55.
MorelockM. J.FeldmanD. H. (1991). Extreme precocity. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 347–364). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
56.
Oxford Illustrated Dictionary. (1970). London: Oxford University Press.
57.
PendarvisE. D.HowleyA. A.HowleyC. B. (1990). The abilities of gifted children. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
58.
PickeringG. W. (1974). Creative malady. London: Allen & Unwin.
59.
PowellP. M. (1987). Genius. Roeper Review, 10(2), 96–100.
60.
PrentkyR. A. (1980). Creativity and psychopathology: A neurocognitive perspective. New York: Praeger.
61.
PrentkyR. A. (1989). Creativity and psychopathology. In GloverJ. A.RonningR. R.ReynoldsC. R. (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 243–269). New York: Plenum.
62.
RadfordJ. (1990). Child prodigies and exceptional early achievers. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
63.
RekdalC. K. (1979). Genius, creativity and eminence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 23, 837–854.
64.
RenzulliJ. S. (Ed.). (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning.
65.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning.
66.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. M. (1991). The reform movement and the quiet crisis in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(1), 26–35.
67.
RichardsR. (1981). Relationships between creativity and psychopathology: An evaluation and interpretation of the evidence. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 103, 261–324.
68.
RoeA. (1983). Early background of eminent scientists. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 170–181). New York: Pergamon.
69.
RothenbergA. (1990). Creativity and madness. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
70.
RussoN. F.O'ConnellA. N. (1983). Models from our past: Psychology's foremothers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 11–54.
71.
SilvermanL. K. (1986). What happens to the gifted girl? In MakerC. J. (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted (pp. 43–89). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
72.
SimontonD. K. (1983). History and the eminent person. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (pp. 233–240). New York: Pergamon.
73.
SimontonD. K. (1984). Genius, creativity and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
SimontonD. K. (1992). The child parents the adult: On getting genius from giftedness. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.AmbrosonM. A. (Eds.), Talent Development (pp. 240–247). New York: Trillium.
75.
SubotnikR.KassanL.SummersE.WasserA. (1993). Genius revisited: High IQ children grown up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
76.
SwedenbergH. T. (Ed.). (1972). The works of John Dryden: Poems 1681–1684. Vol. II. Berkeley: University of California Press.
77.
TannenbaumA. J. (1983). Gifted children. New York: Macmillan.
78.
TermanL. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
79.
TermanL. M.OdenM. H. (1959). Genetic Studies of Genius: Vol. 5. The gifted group at mid-life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
80.
TsanoffR. A. (1949). The ways of genius. New York: Harper & Brothers.
81.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. L. (1988). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
82.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. L. (1989). Characteristics of the developmental path of eminent and gifted adults. In VanTassel-BaskaJ. L.Olszewski-KubiliusP. (Eds.), Patterns of influence on gifted learners (pp. 146–162). New York: Teachers College Press.
83.
WalbergH. J.HerbigM. P. (1991). Developing talent, creativity and eminence. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 245–255). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
84.
WallaceT.WalbergH. J. (1987). Personality traits and childhood environments of eminent essayists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(2), 65–69.
85.
WaltersJ.GardnerH. (1992). The crystallizing experience: Discovering an intellectual gift. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp. 135–155). New York: Pergamon.
86.
WestbergK. L.ArchambaultF. X.DobynsS. M.SalvinT. J. (1993). The classroom practices observation study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 120–146.
87.
YewchukC.ChattertonS.JacksonJ. (1990). Survey of eminent Canadian women. In EllisJ. L.WillinskyJ. M. (Eds.), Girls, women and giftedness (pp. 112–122). New York: Trillium.
88.
ZuckermanH. (1992). The scientific elite: Nobel laureates' mutual influences. In AlbertR. S. (Ed.), Genius and eminence (2nd ed.) (pp. 157–169). New York: Pergamon.
