AlbertR. S. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30, 140–151.
2.
AndersonH. H. (1959). Creativity in perspective. In AndersonH. H. (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 236–267). New York: Harper & Bros.
3.
ArnoldK. D. (1993). Academically talented women in the 1980s: The Illinois Valedictorian Project. In HulbertK. D.SchusterD. T. (Eds.), Women's lives through time: Educated American women of the twentieth century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
BaldwinC. B.ColangeloN.DettmanD. F. (1984). Perspectives of creativity throughout the lifespan. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 9, 9–17.
5.
BergH. M.FerberM. A. (1983). Men and women graduate students: Who succeeds and why. Journal of Higher Education, 54, 629–647.
6.
BlackwellJ. E. (1989). Faculty roles in mentoring minority students. In AdamsM. C.WadsworthE. (Eds.), The role of faculty in meeting the national need for African-American, American Indian, and Latino scholars: Report of the Stony Brook Conference (pp. 25–35). Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York Stony Brook Press.
7.
BloomB. S. (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine.
8.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BraudyL. (1986). The frenzy of renown: Fame and its history. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
CallahanC. M. (1979). The gifted and talented woman. In PassowA. H. (Ed.), The gifted and talented: Their education and development. Seventy-eighth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education: Part 1 (pp. 401–423). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11.
CasserlyP. L. (1980). Factors affecting female participation in advanced placement programs in mathematics, chemistry, and physics. In FoxL. H.BrodyL.TobinD. (Eds.), Women and the mathematical mystique (pp. 138–163). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
12.
ChambersJ. A. (1964). Relating personality and biographical factors to scientific creativity. Psychological Monographs, 78(7), 584, 1–20.
13.
ColemanL. J. (1985). Schooling the gifted. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
CooleyD.ChauvinJ. C.KarnesF. A. (1984). Gifted females: A comparison of attitudes by male and female teachers. Roeper Review, 6, 164–167.
15.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of human experience. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
FeldhusenJ. F. (1992). Talent Identification and Development in Education (TIDE). Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
18.
FeldmanD. (1980). Beyond universals in cognitive development. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19.
FeldmanD. (1986). Nature's gambit. New York: Basic Books.
20.
FoxL. H.TobinD. (1988). Broadening career horizons for gifted girls. (Reprinted from Jan/Feb 1978). Gifted Child Today, 11(1), 9–13.
21.
GagneF. (1991). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65–80). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
22.
GardnerH. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.
23.
GottfredsonL. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monograph, 28(5), 545–579.
24.
HofstadterR. (1963). Anti-intellectualism in American life. New York: Knopf.
25.
HowleyA. (1986). Gifted education and the spectre of elitism. Journal of Education, 68, 117–125.
26.
JacobiM. (1991). Mentoring and undergraduate academic success: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 61, 505–532.
27.
JanosP. M.RobinsonN. M. (1985). The performance of students in a program of radical acceleration at the university level. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, 175–179.
28.
KellerE. F. (1983). A feeling for the organism: The life and work of Barbara McClintock. New York: W. H. Freeman.
29.
KenschaftP. C. (1981). Black women in mathematics in the United States. American Mathematics Monthly, 88, 592–604.
30.
KnappR. H. (1963). Demographic, cultural, and personality attributes of scientists. In TaylorC. W.BarronR. (Eds.) Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 205–216). New York: Wiley.
31.
KulikJ. A. (1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Research Based Decision Making Series, No. 9203. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
32.
KulikJ. A.KulikC-L. C. (1984) Effects of accelerated instruction on students. Review of Educational Research, 54, 409–425.
33.
LandrumG. N. (1993). Profiles of genius: Thirteen creative men who changed the world. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
34.
LandrumG. N. (1994). Profiles of female genius: Thirteen creative women who changed the world. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
35.
LehmanH. C. (1953). Age and achievement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
LewisD. J. (1991). Mathematics and women: The undergraduate school and pipeline. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 38, 721–723.
37.
LightR. J. (1990). The Harvard assessment seminars: Explorations with students and faculty about teaching, learning, and student life (Part 1). Unpublished manuscript. Harvard University, Graduate School of Education and Kennedy School of Government, Cambridge, MA.
38.
MacKinnonD. W. (1962). The nature and nurture of creative talent. American Psychologist, 17, 484–495.
39.
MorelockM. J.FeldmanD. H. (1993). Prodigies and savants: What they have to tell us about giftedness and human cognition. In HellerK. A.MonksF. J.PassowA. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 161–181). Oxford: Pergamon.
40.
MumfordM. D.GustafsonS. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27–43.
41.
NobleK. D.SubotnikR. F.ArnoldK. D. (in press). A new model for adult female talent development: A synthesis of perspectives from Remarkable Women. In ArnoldK. D.NobleK. D.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
42.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
OchseR. (1990). Before the gates of excellence: Determinants of creative genius. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Office of Educational Research and Improvement (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America's talent. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
45.
PassowA. H. (1988). The educating and schooling of the community of artisans in science. In BrandweinP. F.PassowA. H. (Eds.), Gif ted young in science: Potential through performance (pp. 27–38). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
46.
PiirtoJ. (1992). Understanding those who create. Dayton, OH: Ohio Psychology Press.
47.
PiirtoJ. (1994). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. New York: Merrill.
48.
RenzulliJ. S. (1986). The Three-Ring Conception of Giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
RoeA. (1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.
50.
RogersK. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner. Research Based Decision Making Series, No. 9101. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
51.
Sapon-ShevinM. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of the community. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
52.
SimontonD. K. (1984). Genius, creativity, and leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
SlavinR. E. (1990). Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 471–499.
54.
StanleyJ. C.BenbowC. P. (1986). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 361–387). New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
SternbergR. J. (December 2, 1993). Attributes of creativity. Jacob K. Javits Gifted and Talented Education Programs Grantees Meeting. Washington DC.
56.
SternbergR. J.WagnerR. K.OkagakiL. (1993). Practical intelligence: The nature and role of tacit knowledge at work and at school. In PuckettJ. M.ReeseH. W. (Eds.), Mechanisms of everyday cognition (pp. 205–227). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
57.
SubotnikR. F.ArnoldK. D. (in press). Success and sacrifice: The costs of talent fulfillment for women in science. In ArnoldK. D.NobleK. D.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.), Remarkable women: Perspectives on female talent development. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
58.
SubotnikR. F.KassanL.SummersE.WasserA. (1993). Genius revisited: High IQ children grown up. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
59.
SubotnikR. F.SteinerC. L. (1994). Adult manifestations of adolescent talent in science: A longitudinal study of 1983 Westing house Science Talent Search winners. In SubotnikR. F.ArnoldK. D. (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent (pp. 52–76). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
60.
TannenbaumA. J. (1962). Adolescent attitudes toward academic brilliance. New York: Teachers College Press.
61.
TorranceE. P. (1983). The role of mentors in creative achievement. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 8, 8–15.
62.
WagnerR. K.SternbergR. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 436–458.
63.
WalbergH. J. (1988). Creativity and talent as learning. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 340–361). New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
WidomC. S.BurkeB. W. (1978). Performance, attitudes, and professional socialization of women in academia. Sex Roles, 4, 549–562.
65.
WilloughbyS. S. (1990). Mathematics education for a changing world. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.