The challenge of serving gifted students from nonmainstream cultural backgrounds assumes greater complexity when accompanied by linguistic diversity. Gifted students with primary languages other than English, or English language learners, demonstrate wide within-group differences related to language of origin, level of first- and second- language proficiency, cultural background, and type and level of talent. While the majority of bilingual residents in the United States speak Spanish, some school district enrollments represent nearly 100 different language groups, some of very low incidence. To respond to the needs of this population, educators require current information concerning appropriate procedures for identification, service delivery, instructional methods, and community involvement. This article summarizes available literature and suggests future directions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarkanJ. H.BernalE. M. (1991). Gifted education for bilingual and limited English proficient students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 144–147.
2.
BermúdezA. B.RakowS. J. (1990). Analyzing teachers' perceptions of identification procedures for gifted and talented Hispanic limited English proficient (LEP) students at-risk. Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 7, 21–33.
3.
BemalE. M.Jr. (1978). The identification of gifted Chicano children. In BaldwinA. Y.GearG. H.LucitoL. J. (Eds.), Educational planning for the gifted (pp. 14–17). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
4.
CollierV. (1992). A synthesis of studies examining long-term language-minority student data on academic achievement. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(1&2), 187–212.
5.
CumminsJ. (1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 3–49). Los Angeles: California State University at Los Angeles, Evaluation Dissertation and Assessment Center.
6.
CumminsJ. (1989). A theoretical framework for bilingual special education. Exceptional Children, 56(2), 111–119.
7.
de BernardA. E. (1985). Why José can't get in the gifted class: The bilingual child and standardized reading tests. Roeper Review, 8(2), 80–82.
8.
EspinosaR. (1993). Survey of participating school districts, MRC Monthly Seminar: Gifted and Talented Education: Issues, Solutions, and Change. Claremont, CA: Multifunctional Resource Center.
9.
FaltisC. J.AriasM. B. (1993). Speakers of languages other than English in the secondary school: Accomplishments and struggles. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(1), 6–29.
10.
FrasierM. M. (1991). Response to Kitano: The sharing of gifted-ness between culturally diverse and non-diverse gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 20–30.
11.
GarciaE. (1994). Understanding and meeting the challenges of student cultural diversity. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
12.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
13.
GearG. H. (1978). Effects of training on teachers' accuracy in the identification of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 22, 90–97.
14.
GratzE.PulleyJ. L. (1984). A gifted and talented program for migrant students. Roeper Review, 6(3), 147–149.
15.
HamiltonJ. (1984). The gifted migrant child: An introduction. Roeper Review, 6(3), 146–147.
16.
HarrisC. R. (1991). Identifying and serving the gifted new immigrant. Teaching Exceptional Children, 23(4), 26–30.
17.
HenzeR. C.LucasT. (1993). Shaping instruction to promote the success of language minority students: An analysis of four high school classes. Peabody Journal of Education, 69(1), 54–81.
18.
HermansonD.PerezR. I. (1993). Project EXCEL. San Diego, CA: San Diego City Schools, School Services Division, Exceptional Programs Department.
KrashenS. (1982). Principles and practices for second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon.
21.
LindholmK. J. (1992). Two-way bilingual/immersion education: Theory, conceptual issues, and pedagogical implications. In PadillaR. V.BenavidesA. H. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on bilingual education research (pp. 195–220). Tempe, AZ: Bilingual Press.
22.
LucasT.HenzeR.DonatoR. (1990). Promoting the success of Latino language-minority students: An exploratory study of six high schools. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 315–340.
23.
LynchE.HansonM. (Eds.). (1992). Developing cross-cultural competence: A guide for working with young children and their families. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
MakerC. J.SchieverS.W. (Eds.). (1989). Critical issues in gifted education: Vol. II. Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities. Austin: PRO-ED.
25.
National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. (1993). NCBE responds to frequently asked questions. NCBE Forum, 16(3), 1, 4–5.
26.
OrtizV. Z.GonzalezA. (1989). Validation of a short form of the WISC-R with accelerated and gifted Hispanic students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33(4), 152–155.
27.
OrtizV. Z.GonzalezA. (1991). Gifted Hispanic adolescents. In BireleyM.GenshaftJ. (Eds.), The gifted adolescent (pp. 240–247). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
OrtizV.VolloffW. (1987). Identification of gifted and accelerated Hispanic students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 45–55.
29.
PerrineJ. (1989). Situational identification of gifted Hispanic students. In MakerC. J.SchieverS. W. (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Vol. II. Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (pp. 5–18). Austin: PRO-ED.
30.
RamírezJ. D. (1992). Executive summary. Bilingual Research Journal, 16(1&2), 1–62.
31.
RichertE. S. (1985). Identification of gifted children in the United States: The need for pluralistic assessment. Roeper Review, 8(2), 68–72.
32.
RichertE. S. with AlvinoJ. J.McDonnelR. C. (1982). National report on identification: Assessment and recommendations for comprehensive identification of gifted and talented youth. Sewell, NJ: Educational Improvement Center-South.
33.
RobinsonA. (1990). Cooperation or exploitation? The argument against cooperative learning for talented students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 9–27.
34.
RossP. O. (1991). Advocacy for gifted programs in the new educational climate. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(4), 173–176.
35.
RubinJ.RubenfeldJ. (1991, November). Javits 7+ Gifted Program. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, pp. 9–10.
36.
RuizR. (1989). Considerations in the education of gifted Hispanic students. In MakerC. J.SchieverS. W. (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Vol. II. Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (pp. 60–65). Austin: PRO-ED.
37.
SaccuzzoD. P. (1993). Identifying underrepresented disadvantaged gifted and talented children: A multifaceted approach. Manuscript in preparation. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University Department of Psychology.
38.
ScottM. S.PerouR.UrbanoR.HoganA.GoldS. (1992). The identification of giftedness: A comparison of white, Hispanic, and black families. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(3), 131–139.
39.
ScribnerA. P. (1993). The use of interpreters in the assessment of language minority students. The Bilingual Special Education Perspective, 12(2), 1, 3–6.
40.
SlavinR. E. (1990). Ability grouping, cooperative learning, and the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 3–8.
41.
SleekS. (1994, April). Bilingualism enhances student growth. APA Monitor, 48–49.
42.
SnowC. E. (1992). Perspectives on second-language development: Implications for bilingual education. Educational Researcher, 21(2), 16–19.
43.
SternbergR. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
TonemahS. (1987). Assessing American Indian gifted and talented students' abilities. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 181–194.
45.
TorranceE. P. (1977). Discovery and nurturance of giftedness in the culturally different. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
46.
UdallA. J. (1989). Curriculum for gifted Hispanic students. In MakerC. J.SchieverS. W. (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Vol. II. Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (pp. 41–56). Austin: PRO-ED.
47.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993, August 9). New Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Grants Fiscal Year 1993. Washington, DC: Author.
48.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ.PattonJ.PrillamanD. (1989). Disadvantaged gifted learners at-risk for educational attention. Focus on Exceptional Children, 22(3), 1–15.
49.
FillmoreWong L. (1992). Learning a language from learners. In KramsC.McCons-GinetS. (Eds.), Text and context: Disciplinary perspectives on language students (pp. 46–66). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.
50.
Wong-FillmoreL. (1994, April). Working with language and cultural diversity in the schools. Presentation at the Multicultural Education Infusion Center Summer Institute. San Diego: SDSU College of Education.
51.
ZappiaI. A. (1989). Identification of gifted Hispanic students: A multidimensional view. In MakerC. J.SchieverS. W. (Eds.), Critical issues in gifted education: Vol. II. Defensible programs for cultural and ethnic minorities (pp. 19–26). Austin: PRO-ED.
