AlexanderW. (1969). The new school in the middle. Phi Delta Kap-pan, 50, 335–357.
2.
AlexanderW.WilliamsE.ComptonM.HinesV.PrescottD.KealyR. (1968). The emergent middle school. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
3.
ArnoldJ. (1990). Visions of teaching and learning: Eighty exemplary middle level projects. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Assn.
4.
ArnoldJ. (1991). Towards a middle school curriculum rich in meaning. Middle School Journal, 23(2), 8–12.
5.
BeaneJ. (1993). A middle school curriculum (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: National Middle School Assn.
6.
BriggsT. (1920). The junior high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
BoyerE. (1993). High school: A report on secondary education in America. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
BroudyH.PalmerJ. (1965). Exemplars of teaching method. Chicago: Rand McNally.
9.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success & failure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
EichhornD. (1966). The middle school. New York: The Center for Applied Research in Education, Inc. Reprinted as D. Eichhorn. (1987). The middle school. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Assn.
11.
EichhornD. (1973). The Boyce medical study. In AtkinsN.PumerantzP. (Eds.). Educational dimensions of the emerging adolescent learner. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
12.
ElkindD. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38, 1025–1034.
13.
ElkindD. (1984). All grown up and no place to go: Teenagers in crisis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
14.
ErbT. (1988). Focusing back on the child by liberating the teacher. T.E.A.M.—The Early Adolescence Magazine, 2(3), 10–18.
15.
ErbT. (1991). Preparing prospective middle grades teachers to understand the curriculum. Middle School Journal, 23(2), 24–28.
ErbT.DodaN. (1989). Team organization: Promise—practices and possibilities. Washington, DC: National Education Assn.
18.
EriksonE. (1963). Childhood and Society. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
19.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity, youth, and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
20.
EsonM.WalmsleyS. (1980). Promoting cognitive and psycho-linguistic development (Chap. 11). In JohnsonM. (Ed.). Toward adolescence: The middle school years. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
21.
FineB. (1947). Our children are cheated: The crisis in American education. New York: Henry Holt & Co.
22.
FraunceR.CluteM. (1961). Teaching and learning in the junior high school. San Francisco: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
23.
FriedmanR.ErbT., (1994). Developing talent in middle schools: The River Styx or the River Jordan. Unpublished manuscript.
24.
GeorgeP.AlexanderW. (1993). The exemplary middle school (2nd ed.). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
25.
GoodladJ. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill.
26.
GruhnW.DouglassH. (1947). The modern junior high school. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
27.
IngelsS.AbrahamS.SpencerB.FrankelM. (1989). National educational longitudinal study of 1988. Base year: Student component data file user's manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
28.
JohnsonD.JohnsonR.HolubecE.RoyP. (1984). Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Assn. for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
29.
KaplanS. (1986). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In RenzulliJ. (Ed.). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 180–193). Mansfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
30.
KliebardH. (1987). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1938–1958. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31.
KoosL. (1920). The junior high school. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Howe.
32.
KoosL. (1955). Junior high school trends. New York: Harper & Brothers, Publishers.
33.
LeeV.SmithJ. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66, 164–187.
34.
LounsburyJ. (Ed.). (1992). Connecting the curriculum through inter-disciplinary instruction. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Assn.
35.
LounsburyJ.ClarkD. (1990). Inside grade eight: From apathy to excitement. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
36.
LounsburyJ.VarsG. (1978). A curriculum for the middle school years. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.
37.
MakerC. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen.
38.
McNeilL. (1986). Contradictions of control: School structure and school knowledge. New York: Routledge.
39.
MeadM. (1965). Early adolescence in the United States. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 49(300), 5–10.
40.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41.
NoarG. (1953). The junior high school: Today and tomorrow. New York: Prentice-Hall.
42.
RedlF. (1996). Preadolescents—what makes them tick?. In RedlF. (Ed.). When we deal with children. New York: The Free Press.
43.
ReisS.RenzulliJ. (1985). The secondary triad model: A practical plan for implementing gifted programs at the junior and senior high school levels. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
44.
RenzulliJ. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
45.
RenzulliJ. (1988). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 298–309.
46.
U.S. Dept. of Labor. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Labor.
SharanS. (1980). Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, & ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241–271.
49.
SizerT. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
SkrticT. (1989). School organization and adaptability: A structural perspective on equity and excellence. Paper presented at the 3rd annual School Improvement Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, June 12–16.
52.
SkrticT. (1991a). Behind special education: A critical analysis of professional culture and school organization. Denver: Love Publishing Company.
53.
SkrticT. (1991b). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61(2), 148–206.
54.
StanleyJ. (1980). On educating the gifted. Educational Researcher, 9(3), 8–12.
55.
StanleyJ. (1981). On mathematically talented youth: A conversation with Julian Stanley. Educational Leadership, 39(2), 101–106.
56.
StevensonC. (1991). You've got to see the game to see the game. Middle School Journal, 23(2), 13–17.
57.
StevensonC. (1992). Teaching ten to fourteen year olds. New York: Longman.
58.
StevensonC.CarrJ. (1993). Integrated studies in the middle grades: Dancing through walls. New York: Teachers College Press.
59.
ValentineJ. (1992, February 4–18). National study of middle level leaders and practices: Preliminary findings. Paper presented at the annual conference of the National Assn. of Secondary School Principals, San Francisco.
60.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (1989). Appropriate curriculum for gifted learners. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 13–15.
61.
Van TilW.VarsG.LounsburyJ. (1961). Modern education for the junior high years. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company. (revised edition published 1967).
62.
WhiteheadA. (1929/1963). The aims of education. New York: Mentor Books.
63.
WrigleyJ. (1982). Class politics and public schools: Chicago 1900–1950. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.