Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Classroom Practices Observational Study conducted by The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented (NRC/GT) examined the instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular elementary classrooms throughout the United States. This article describes the procedures used in this study and the results obtained from systematic observations in 46 third or fourth grade classrooms. The observations were designed to determine if and how classroom teachers meet the needs of gifted and talented students in the regular classroom. Two students, one gifted and talented and one average ability student, were selected as target students for each observation day. The Classroom Practices Record (CPR) was developed to document the types and frequencies of differentiated instruction that gifted students receive through modifications in curricular activities, materials, and teacher-student verbal interactions. Descriptive statistics and chi-square procedures were used to analyze the CPR data. The results indicated little differentiation in the instructional and curricular practices, grouping arrangements, and verbal interactions for gifted and talented students in the regular classroom. Across five subject areas and 92 observation days, the observed gifted and talented students experienced no instructional or curricular differentiation in 84% of their instructional activities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archambault

Westberg

Brown

Hallmark

Emmons

Zhang

(1992). Technical report: Results of the classroom practices survey. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

Bernstein

(1985). The new politics of textbook adoption. Phi Delta Kappan, 66, 463–466.

Bloom

(1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Bogdan

Biklen

(1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Educational Products Information Exchange Institute (EPIE) (1979). Grant Progress Report NIE-G-790083 Mimeograph. Stonybrook, NY: EPIE

Evertson

Burry

(1989). Capturing classroom context: The observation system as lens for assessment, Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 2, 297–320.

Frick

Semmel

(1978). Observer agreement and reliabilities of classroom observational measures. Review of Educational Research, 48, 157–184.

Gallagher

(1985). Teaching the gifted child (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Giesen

Sirotnik

(1979). The methodology of classroom observation in a study of schooling (Technical Report No. 5). Los Angeles: Graduate School of Education, University of California at Los Angeles.

10.

Goodlad

(1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

11.

Kaplan

(1979). Inservice training: Activities for developing curriculum for the gifted and talented. Ventura, CA: National/State Leadership Institute on the Gifted and Talented.

12.

Kirst

(1982). How to improve schools without spending more money. Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 6–8.

13.

Kulik

(1992). An analysis of the research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives (Report No. 9204). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

14.

Lutz

(1980). Gifted pupils in the elementary school setting: An ethnographic study. (Project No. EC 124 520) Boston, MA: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 191 190).

15.

Maker

(1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation.

16.

Maker

(1986). Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted. Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers.

17.

National Research Council (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington D. C.: The National Academy Press.

18.

Morris

(May, 1989). Educating the gifted for the 1990s. In Morris

R. C.

Smith

(Eds.), Thresholds in education, 15 (2) pp. 50 –52.

19.

Parke

(1989). Gifted students in regular classrooms. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

20.

Passow

(1955). Talented youth: Our future leaders. Teachers College Record, 57, 164–171, December.

21.

Radin

(1991, September 30). Gifted students face test of indifference: Some say the best and brightest students lose out. The Boston Globe, pp. 1, 14.

22.

Renzulli

(1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

23.

Renzulli

Reis

(1985). The schoolwide enrichment model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

24.

———. (1986). The enrichment triad/revolving door model: A schoolwide plan for the development of creative productivity (pp. 216–266). In Renzulli

J. S.

(Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 27–56). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

25.

Rogers

(1991). The relatonship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner (Report No. 9101). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

26.

Ryans

(1960). Characteristics of teachers. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

27.

Sattler

(1988). Assessment of children (3rd ed.). San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler, Publisher.

28.

Sewall

(1988). American history textbooks: Where do we go from here? Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 552–558.

29.

Snow

[in collaboration with E. Yalow]. (1982). Education and intelligence. In Sternberg

(Ed.), Handbook of human intelligence (pp. 493–586). London: Cambridge University Press.

30.

SPSS, Inc. (1988). SPSS-X user's guide (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Author.

31.

Stewart

(1982). Myth: One program, indivisible for all. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 27–29.

32.

Taylor

Frye

(1988). Pretesting: Minimizing time spent on skill work of intermediate readers. The Reading Teacher, 42 (2), 100–103.

33.

Treffinger

(1986). Fostering effective independent learning through individualized programming. In Renzulli

(Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 429–460). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

34.

Westberg

Archambault

Jr. Dobyns

Salvin

(1992). Technical report for the classroom practices study: An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

35.

Westberg

Dobyns

Archambault

(1990). The training manual for The Classroom Practices Record. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.

The Classroom Practices Observation Study

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References