ArnoldA.ArnoldC. (1981). Administering gifted programs in the junior high school. In Ventura County Superintendent (Ed.), Secondary programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 11–14). Ventura, CA: Ventura County Superintendent of Schools Office.
2.
BraceyG. (1987). The social impact of ability grouping. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, 701–702.
3.
ColemanL.CrossT. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41–56.
4.
ConnorsN.IrvinJ. (1989). Is “middle-schoolness” an indicator of excellence?Middle School Journal, 20(5), 12–14.
5.
DavisG.RimmS. (1985). Education of the gifted and talented. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6.
FichterG. (1987). Special education for gifted children is a good idea. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 79–86.
7.
GallagherJ. (1986). Equity vs. excellence: An educational drama. Roeper Review, 8, 233–235.
8.
GallagherJ. (1988a). Issues in education for the gifted. In RichJ. (Ed.), Innovations in education: Reformers and their critics (pp. 258–261). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
9.
GallagherJ. (1988b). National agenda for educating gifted students: Statement of priorities. Exceptional Children, 55, 107–114.
10.
GeorgeP. (1988). Tracking and ability grouping: Which way for the middle school?Middle School Journal, 20(1), 21–28.
11.
GoldbergM. (1986). Issues in the education of the gifted and talented children. Roeper Review, 8, 226–233.
12.
HornerC.MadduxC.GreenC. (1986). Minority students and special education: Is overrepresentation possible?NASSP Bulletin, 70(492), 89–93.
13.
HowardA.StoumbisG. (1970). The junior high and middle school: Issues and practices. Scranton, PA: Intext Educational.
14.
JohnstonJ.MarkleG. (1986). What research says to the middle level practitioner. Columbus, OH: National Middle School Association.
15.
KulikJ.KulikC. (1987). Effects of ability grouping on student achievement. Equity and Excellence, 23(1–2), 22–30.
16.
LakeS. (1985). Update on tracking and ability grouping. Redwood City, CA: San Mateo Office of Education.
LevyT. (1988). Making a difference in the middle. Social Education, 52, 104–106.
19.
LounsburyJ. (1988). Middle level social studies: Points to ponder. Social Education, 52, 116–118.
20.
McCarthyR. (1970). The ungraded middle school. West Nyack, NY: Parker.
21.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
22.
National Middle School Association 1988–89 resolutions. (1989). Middle School Journal, 20(3), 18–20.
23.
ParkB. (1988). Ask the experts. Gifted Children Monthly, 9(6), 21–22.
24.
ParkerJ. (1988). Differentiated programs for the G/C/T … Luxury or necessity?Gifted Child Today, 11(1), 31–33.
25.
RakowS. (1989). Gifted … and puberty too. Middle School Journal, 20(4), 18–19.
26.
Recognition of the middle level of schooling. (1988). Middle School Journal, 19(3), 27.
27.
SchmitzC.GalbraithJ. (1985). Managing the social and emotional needs of the gifted. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
28.
SlavinR. (1988). Synthesis of research on grouping in elementary and secondary schools. Educational Leadership, 46(1), 67–77.
29.
TannenbaumA. (1983). Gifted children. New York: Macmillan.
30.
ToepferC. (1988). What to know about young adolescents. Social Education, 52, 110–112.
31.
Toward excellence at the middle level. (1987). Gifted Children Monthly, 8(5), 4.
32.
TreffingerD. (1974). Teaching for self-directed learning: A priority for the gifted and talented. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 46–59.
33.
TuttleF. (1983). Gifted and talented students. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
34.
Van Tassel BaskaJ. (1989). Appropriate curriculum for gifted learners. Educational Leadership, 46(6), 13–15.