Adolescent females have been largely ignored in previous research on high ability youth, despite the social pressures and family conflicts they may experience as a result of their efforts to achieve commensurate with their high abilities. The present study investigates the self-concepts (perceived competence) and quality of parent-adolescent communication in 60 high ability adolescent females, including 42 who left home to enroll in an early college entrance program and 18 who attended more traditional high school programs. Results indicate that the quality of parent-adolescent communication for these young women: (1) varies widely with both mothers and fathers; and (2) is consistently associated with perceived competence in both academic and non-academic areas. As a group, the young women have above-average academic and overall perceived competence, but IQ is negatively correlated with perceived competence in non-academic areas.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BachtoldL. (1976). Personality characteristics of women of distinction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1, 70–78.
2.
BachtoldL., & WernerE. (1970). Personality profiles of gifted women: Psychologists. American Psychologist, 25, 234–243.
3.
BardwickJ. (1971). Psychology of women. New York: Harper & Row.
4.
BarnesH., & OlsonD. (1982). Parent-adolescent communication scale. In OlsonD. H.., Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (pp. 33–48). St. Paul: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
5.
BarnesH., & OlsonD. (1985). Parent-adolescent communication and the circumplex model. Child Development, 56, 438–447.
6.
BaruchG. (1976). Girls who perceive themselves as competent: Some antecedents and correlates. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1, 38–49.
7.
BetzN., & FitzgeraldL. (1987). The career psychology of women. Orlando: Academic Press.
8.
BloomB. (1982). The role of gifts and markers in the development of talent. Exceptional Children, 48, 510–522.
9.
CallahanC. (1979). The gifted and talented woman. In Pas-SowA.H., (ed.), The Gifted and talented: Their education and development. Seventy-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.
CallahanC. (1982). Parents of the gifted and talented, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 5, 247–257.
11.
CallahanC., & KauffmanJ. (1982). Involving gifted children's parents: Federal law is silent, but its assumptions apply. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 3 (2), 50–55.
12.
ColangeloN., & DettmannD. (1983). A review of research on parents and families of gifted children. Exceptional Children, 48, 510–522.
13.
CooperC. (1982, August). Family support and conflict: Both foster adolescent identity and role taking. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
14.
CornellD. (1983). Gifted children: The impact of positive labeling on the family system. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53 (2), 322–355.
15.
CornellD. (1984). Families of gifted children. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.
16.
CornellD., & GrossbergI. (1987). Family environment and personality adjustment of children in gifted programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 59–64.
17.
CornellD., & GrossbergI. (1989). Parent use of the term “gifted”: Correlates with family environment and child adjustment, Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 12 (3), 218–230.
18.
DirkesM. (1983). Anxiety in the gifted: Plusses and minuses. Roeper Review, 6, 68–70.
19.
EcclesJ. (1987, August). Understanding motivation: Achievement beliefs, gender roles, and changing educational environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Amer. Psychol. Assoc., New York.
20.
EcclesJ., AdlerT., FuttermanR., GoffS., KaczalaC., MeeceJ., & MidgelyC. (1983). Expectations, values, and academic behaviors. In SpenceJ.T. (ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–145). San Francisco: Freeman.
21.
EcclesJ., AdlerT., & MeeceJ. (1984). Sex differences in achievement: A test of alternate theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 26–43.
22.
HarterS. (1982). The Perceived Competence Scale for Children. Child Development, 53, 87–97.
23.
HarterS. (1985). Self-Perception Profile for Children. Denver: University of Denver.
24.
HarterS. (1986). Self-perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver: University of Denver.
25.
HelsonR. (1971). Women mathematicians and the creative personality. Journal of Personality, 36, 210–211, 217–220.
26.
HollingworthL. (1926). Gifted children: Their nature and nurture. New York: Macmillan.
27.
JanosP., & RobinsonN. (1985). Psychosocial development in intellectually gifted children. In HorowitzF.D. & O'BrienM. (eds.). The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
28.
KellyK., & ColangeloN. (1984). Academic and social self-concerns of gifted, general, and special students. Exceptional Children, 50, 551–554.
LeavertonL., & HerzogS. (1979). Adjustment of the gifted child. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 149–152.
31.
MonksE., & FergusonT. (1983). Gifted adolescents: An analysis of their psychological development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 12, 1–18.
32.
ReynoldsC., & BradleyM. (1983). Emotional stability of intellectually superior children versus nongifted peers as estimated by chronic anxiety levels. School Psychology Review, 12 (2), 190–194.
33.
RidgewayC., & JacobsonC. (1979). The development of female ideology: Impact of personal confidence during adolescence. Youth and Society, 10, 297–315.
SterikerA., & JohnsonJ. (1977). Sex-role identification and self-esteem in college students: Do men and women differ?Sex Roles, 3, 19–26.
36.
TermanL., (1925). Genetic study of genius. Volume I. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37.
TinsleyD., & FaunceP. (1980). Enabling, facilitating, and precipitating factors associated with women's career orientation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 183–194.
