The purpose of the present study was to test predictions derived from two different theoretical perspectives in order to achieve a better understanding of changes in career aspirations among gifted and talented young women. The sample consisted of 247 G/T young women who completed the Personal Attributes Questionnaire (PAQ) and the Self Directed Search (SDS) in both their sophomore and junior years of high school. The results indicated that, while gender identity does appear to play a central role, adolescents' occupational interests, competencies and preferences do change and undergo refinement as a function of emerging instrumental and expressive self perceptions. Implications for counseling G/T young women are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArnoldK.DennyT. (1984, April). Academic achievement—A view from the top: The lives of high school valedictorians and salutatorians. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
2.
BernS. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–62.
3.
BernS. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88 (4), 354–64.
4.
CardJ.SteeleJ.AbelesR. (1980). Sex differences in realization of individual potential for achievement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 17, 1–20.
5.
FlemingE.HollingerC. (1979). Realizing the promise of female adolescents: A diagnostic-prescriptive model. Final report to the Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare (W. E. E. A. P. #G00760497).
6.
FlemingE.HollingerC. et al. (1979). Project Choice: Creating her options in career explorations. Boston: Educational Development Corporation.
7.
GottfredsonL. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology Monograph, 28, 545–79.
8.
HelmreichR.SpenceJ.HolahanC. (1979). Psychological androgyny and sex role flexibility: A test of two hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1631–44.
9.
HelmreichR.SpenceJ.WilhelmJ. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attribute Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7 (11), 1097–1108.
HollandJ. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
12.
HollingerC. (1985). The stability of self perceptions of instrumental and expressive traits and social self esteem among gifted and talented female adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 8 (1), 107–26.
13.
HollingerC. (1984). The impact of gender schematic processing on the SDS responses of gifted and talented female adolescents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 24, 25–27.
14.
HollingerC. (1983). Counseling the gifted and talented female adolescent: The relationship between social self esteem and traits of instrumentality and expressiveness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27 (4), 157–61.
15.
HollingerC.FlemingE.(in press). Gifted and talented young women: Antecedents and correlates of life satisfaction. Gifted Child Quarterly..
16.
KaufmanF. (1981). The 1946–1968 presidential scholars: A follow-up study. Exceptional Children, 48 (2).
17.
KeelingB.TuckB. (1978). Raw scores versus same-sex normed scores: An experimental study of the validity of Holland's SDS with adolescents of both sexes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 13, 263–71.
18.
KellyJ.FurmanW.YoungV. (1978). Problems associated with the typological measurement of sex roles and androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46 (6), 1574–76.
KohlbergL. (1966). A cognitive-developmental analysis of children's sex role concepts and attitudes. In MaccobyE. E. (Ed.). The development of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
LivesleyW.BromleyD. (1973). Person perception in childhood and adolescence. London: Wiley.
22.
MarlandS. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the Commissioner of Education. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
23.
RodensteinJ.HughesC. Glickhauf (1979). Career and lifestyle determinants of gifted women. In ColangeloN.ZaffranR. T. (Eds.). New Voices in Counseling the Gifted. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
24.
SpenceJ.HelmreichR.StappJ. (1974). The Personal Attributes Questionnaire: A measurement of sex role stereotypes and masculinity-femininity. Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 4 (43). (MS. NO. 617).
25.
SpenceJ.HelmreichR. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
26.
SpenceJ.HelmreichR. (1980). Masculine intrumentality and feminine expressiveness: Their relationships with sex role attitudes and behaviors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 147–63.
27.
SpenceJ.HelmreichR. (1981). Androgyny versus gender schema: A comment on Bern's gender schema theory. Psychological Review, 88 (4), 365–368.
28.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
29.
SAS user's guide. (1979). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
30.
Van den DaeleL. (1968). A developmental study of the ego ideal. Genetic Psychological Monographs, 78, 191–256.
