HannaG.DettmerP. (1982). A sensible foundation for gifted student IEP development. Manhattan, KS: KSU College of Education.
9.
HealeyW. (1986). Creating a gifted ghetto from the principle of ‘no policy’: A reply to “Policies and Procedures.” In MakerJ. (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted (pp. 257–64). Rockville, MD: Aspen.
10.
HodgkinsonH. (1988). The right schools for the right kids. Educational Leadership, 45 (5), 10–14.
11.
HowleyA.HowleyC.PendarvisE. (1986). Teaching gifted children: Principles and strategies. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
12.
HuefnerD. (1988). The consulting teacher model: Risks and opportunities. Exceptional Children, 54 (5), 403–14.
13.
KuhnT. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
LoebV. (1986). Suit tests adequacy of programs for the gifted. Education Week, 5 (20), 1 & 14.
15.
MarlandS. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States by the U. S. Commissioner of Education. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
16.
McCayV. (1985). Is mainstreaming beneficial to the handicapped and to society? In NollJ. (Ed.), Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial educational issues (pp. 253–58). Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publ. Group, Inc.
17.
MitchellP. (1981). A policymaker's guide to issues in gifted and talented education. Washington, D. C.: National Association of State Boards of Education.
18.
ReisS.RenzulliJ. (1985). The secondary triad model: A plan for implementing gifted programs at the junior and senior high school levels. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
19.
RenzulliJ. (1987). Point-Counterpoint: The positive side of pullout programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10 (4), 245–54.
20.
ReynoldsM.WangM.WalbergH. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53 (5), 391–98.
21.
SawyerR. (1988). In defense of academic rigor. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11 (2), 5–19.
Staff. (1986, August). ASCD study documents changes needed in high school curriculum. ASCD Curriculum Update, pp. 1–10.
24.
StainbackW.StainbackS. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51 (2), 102–11.
25.
State of the States Gifted and Talented Education Report. (1987). In HousemanW. (Ed.), The 1987 State of the States Gifted and Talented Education Report: The Council of State Directors of Programs for the Gifted. Helena, MT: Montana State Department of Education.
26.
SternbergR. (1982). A schism has arisen. Roeper Review, 4 (3), 52.
27.
TreffingerD.RenzulliJ. (1986). Giftedness as potential for creative productivity: Transcending IQ scores. Roeper Review, 8 (3), 150–54.
28.
Van Tassel BaskaJ. (1981). An administrator's guide to the education of gifted and talented children. Washington, D. C.: National Association of State Boards of Education.
29.
WiseA. (1979). Legislated learning: The bureaucratization of the American classroom. Berkeley: University of California Press.