The Motivation to Experiment: A Study of Gifted Adolescents' Attitudes toward Scientific Research

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate some of the variables that characterize students who have achieved success in science. One hundred forty-six winners of the 1983 Westinghouse Science Talent Search completed a questionnaire exploring the subjects' views on the role of the scientist in society, images of self as scientist, personal motivations for conducting scientific research, qualities admired in scientific heroes or heroines, and how often teachers discussed interactions of science and society. Chi square and ANOVA analyses were employed with each of two independent variables: gender and area of science. Female subjects reported more concern with social impacts of scientific research, less variability in their self-image as a scientist, and a tendency to attribute success to hard work and dedication rather than intelligence or creativity than did male subjects. Over all, subjects identified curiosity as the primary impetus for research and indicated a moderate amount of exposure to scientific controversy in the secondary science classroom.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benbow

Stanley

(1984). Gender and the science major. In Steinkamp

Maehr

M. L.

(Eds.), Women in science: Recent advances in motivation and achievement (vol. 1). Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.

Blaisdell

M. L.

(1984) Mainstreaming science: The history of science in a liberal arts curriculum, Liberal Education., 70 (1), 27–34.

Brown

(Ed.). (1971). The social responsibility of the scientist. New York: Free Press.

Bunge

(1967). Scientific research I: The search for system. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Cattell

R. B.

(1963). The personality and motivation of the researcher from measurements of contemporaries and from biographies. In Taylor

C. W.

(Ed.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: John Wiley.

Cole

J. R.

Cole

(1973). Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Frieze

I. H.

Hanusa

B. H.

(1984). Women scientists: Overcoming barriers. In Steinkemp

M. W.

Maehr

M. L.

(Eds.), Women in science: Recent advances in motivation and achievement. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.

Gruber

H. E.

(1974). Darwin on man: A psychological study of scientific creativity. New York: Dutton.

Kadushin

Reason analysis (1968). In Sills

D. L.

(Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (vol. 13). New York: MacMillan.

10.

Kelly

(1978). Girls and science: An international study of sex differences in school achievement. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.

11.

Kieffer

G. H.

(1980). Should bioethics be taught? The American Biology Teacher, 42 (2), 110–113.

12.

MacKinnon

D. W.

(1978). In search of human effectiveness: Identifying and developing creativity. Buffalo, New York: Creative Education Foundation.

13.

Matyas

M. L.

(1985). Factors affecting female achievement and interest in science and in science careers. In Kahle

J. B.

(Ed.), Women in Science. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.

14.

McClelland

D. C.

(1963). The calculated risk: An aspect of scientific performance. In Taylor

C. W.

(Ed.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: John Wiley.

15.

McPherson

J. H.

(1964). Environment and training for creativity. In Taylor

C. W.

(Ed.), Creativity: Progress and potential. New York: McGraw-Hill.

16.

Mitroff

I. I.

(1974). The subjective side of science: A philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo moon scientists. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Publishing Co.

17.

Ogburn

W. F.

(1937). Social change: With respect to culture and original nature. New York: Viking Press.

18.

Omerod

M. B.

Duckworth

(1975). Pupils' attitudes to science: A review of research. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

19.

Parsons

Goff

(1980). Achievement motivation and values: An alternative perspective. In Fyans

L. J.

Jr. (Ed.) Achievement motivation: Recent trends in theory and research. New York: Plenum Press.

20.

Roe

(1953). The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead.

21.

Rossiter

M. W.

(1982). Women scientists in America: Struggles and strategies to 1940. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

22.

Smail

Kelly

(1984). Sex differences in science and technology among 11 year old school children: Affective domain. Research in science and technology education., 2, 87–106.

23.

Stein

M. I.

(1963). A transactional approach to creativity. In Taylor

C. W.

(Ed.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development. New York: John Wiley.

24.

Steinkamp

M. W.

Maehr

M. L.

(1984). Gender differences in motivational orientations toward achievement in school science: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal, 21 (1), 39–59.

25.

Subotnik

R. F.

(1986). Scientific creativity: Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners' problem finding behavior. In World Council for Gifted Children (Eds.), Giftedness: A continuing worldwide challenge. New York: Trillium Press

26.

Tannenbaum

A. J.

(1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York: MacMillan.

27.

Zuckerman

(1977). Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.