This paper reviews the literature on the families of gifted and talented individuals for purposes of determining the importance of several broad areas in the talent development process. These are the structural or demographic characteristics of the family, family climate or family environment, values espoused by parents, and values enacted by parents. Family climate variables are found to distinguish between individuals who evidence creative achievement versus those who evidence academic achievement. While structural and demographic variables may mirror psychological processes within the family that influence the role of gifted children and interaction patterns with family members, success may be the result of numerous forces. Further research linking the values of parents with child-rearing practices and later child outcomes is clearly indicated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlbertR. (1971). Cognitive development and parental loss among the gifted. Psychological Reports, 29, 19–26.
2.
AlbertR. (1980, Fall). Exceptionally gifted boys and their parents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24 (4), 174–179.
3.
AlbertR. (1980, Spring). Family positions and the attainment of eminence: A study of special family positions and special family experiences. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24 (2), 87–95.
4.
AlbertR. (1978, Summer). Observations and suggestions regarding giftedness, familial influence and the achievement of eminence. Gifted Child Quarterly28 (2), 201–211.
5.
BalleringL., & KochA. (1984, Summer). When a child is gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly28 (3), 140–143.
6.
BarbeW. (1981). A study of the family background of the gifted.
7.
In BarbeW. & RenzulliJ. (eds.), Psychology and Education of the Gifted (3rd ed.), pp. 302–309. New York: Irvington Publishers.
BrooksJ. (1973). Familial antecedents and adult correlates of artistic interests in childhood. Journal of Personality, 41, 110–120.
11.
BuescherT. (1986). The effect of family structure and expectations on the performance and adjustment of highly talented adolescents: selected case studies. Paper presented at Annual Meeting, National Association of Gifted Children, Las Vegas, Nevada.
12.
BuescherT. (1987, in preparation). Nurturing talent and esteem in young gifted adolescents: the role of the family. Evanston: The Center for Talent Development.
HackneyH. (1982). Effects of the family: Random or orchestrated. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 6 (1), 30–38.
22.
HackneyH. (1981, Spring). The gifted child, the family, and the school. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25 (2), 51–54.
23.
HelsonR., & CrutchfieldR. (1970). Mathematicians: The creative research and the average Ph.D. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 34, 250–257.
24.
KahlJ. (1953, Summer). Educational and occupational aspirations of “common man boys”. Harvard Educational Review, 23 (3), 186–203.
25.
KuliekeM. and OlszewskiP. (1987). The influence of the family environment on the development of talent. To appear in Van-Tassel-BaskaJ. and OlszewskiP. (eds.) Patterns of Influence on Talent Development; The Home, The School and the Self. Teachers College, Columbia Press.
26.
LeichterH. (1977). Some perspectives on the family as educator. In The Family as Educator (pp. 1–43). Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
27.
MacKinnonD. (1965). Personality and the realization of creative potential. American Psychologist, 20, 273–281.
28.
McGillivrayR. (1964, Spring). Differences in home background between high-achieving and low-achieving gifted children: A study of one hundred grade eight pupils in the city of Toronto public schools. Ontario Journal of Educational Research, 6 (2), 99–106.
29.
NicholsR. (1964). Parental attitudes of mothers of intelligent adolescents and creativity of their children. Child Development, 35, 1041–1049.
30.
PfoutsJ. (1980, August). Birth order, age-spacing, IQ differences, and family relations, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 517–528.
31.
RoeA. (1953). The Making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead & Co.
32.
SatirV. (1984). Peoplemaking. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.
33.
SebringA. (1983, November). Parental factors in the social and emotional adjustment of the gifted. Roeper Review, 97–99.
34.
SheldonP. (1954, February). The families of highly gifted children. Marriage and Family Living, 59–67.
35.
SloaneK. (1984). Home influences on talent development in developing talent in young people. In BloomB. (ed.), Talent Development (pp. 439–476).
36.
SmithT. (1985, November). Sex and sibling structure: Interaction effects upon the accuracy of adolescent perceptions of parental orientations, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 901–907.
37.
SmithT. (1982, August). The case for parental transmission of educational goals: The importance of accurate offspring perceptions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 661–674.
38.
TidwellR. (1980, Spring). A psycho-educational profile of 1,593 gifted high school students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 24 (2), 63–68.
39.
Van-Tassel-BaskaJ. (1983, Summer). Profiles of precocity: The 1982 midwest talent search finalists. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27 (3), 139–144.
40.
WalbergH., RasherS., & ParkersonJ.(Fourth Quarter). Childhood and eminence. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 13 (4), 225–231.
WeisbergP. & SpringerK. (1961, December). Environmental factors in creative function: A study of gifted children. Archives of General Psychiatry, 5, 64–74.
