Discrepancies between ability and achievement were calculated for reading, spelling, and arithmetic for 64 intellectually gifted students in grades 4–6. Means were plotted for males and females. While no statistically significant differences were found between groups, females scored closer to their expected achievement levels than males, except at the fourth grade level in reading. The data are presented graphically and are discussed relative to classroom strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaldwinA. & WoosterJ. (1977). Baldwin identification matrix inservice kit for the identification of gifted and talented students.Buffalo, NY: D.O.K. Publishers.
2.
FeldhusenJ.F. (1963). Programming and talented students.Clearinghouse, 38, 151–154.
3.
GeorgeW., CohnS., & StanleyJ. (1977). Educating the gifted.Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
4.
JastakJ. & JastakS. (1978). Wide Range Achievement Test—1978 Edition.Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
5.
MarlandA. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report to the Congress of the United States.Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
6.
NieN., HullC., JenkinsJ., SteinbrennerK., & BentD. (1975). Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). NY: McGraw-Hill.
7.
ParkeB. N. (1983). Use of instructional materials with primary-aged students.Gifted Child Quarterly, 27(1), 29–34.
8.
RenzulliJ. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented.Mansfield Center CT: Creative Learning Press.
9.
RenzulliJ. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining the definition.Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 18–24.
