BarnettJ.J.Naturalistic study of project interagency linkages: The linkage case study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983, 5 (4).
2.
CampbellD.J., and StanleyJ.C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research.Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1966.
3.
EisnerE.W.The perceptive eye: toward the reformation of educational evaluation. Occasional Papers of the Stanford Evaluation Consortium.Stanford: Stanford University, 1975.
4.
GubaE.G., and LincolnY.S.Effective evaluation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1981.
5.
GubaE.G.Investigative journalism. In SmithN.L. (Ed.), New techniques for evaluation.Beverly Hills: Sage, 1981.
6.
GubaE.G.Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. CSE Monograph Series, 1978, No. 8.
7.
ParlettM., and HamiltonD.Evaluation as illumination: a new approach to the study of innovatory programs. In GlassG.V. (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 1). Beverly Hills: Sage, 1976.
StakeR.E.Program evaluation, particularly responsive evaluation. Occasional Paper Series, No. 5. Kalamazoo: Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, 1975.
11.
StufflebeamD.L., FoleyW.J., GephartW.J., GubaE.G., HammondR.L., MerrimanH.O., and ProvusM.M.Educational evaluation and decision-making.Itasca, III.: Peacock, 1971.
12.
StufflebeamD.L., and WebsterW.J.An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1980, 3.
13.
WolfR.L.Trial by jury: a new evaluation method. Phi Delta Kappan, 1975, 57.
14.
WolfR.L.Strategies for conducting naturalistic evaluation in socio-educational settings: the naturalistic interview. Occasional Paper Series.Kalamazoo: Evaluation Center, Western Michigan University, 1979.