ArchambaultF.X.Coming of age as a discipline: A review of educational program evaluation. Invited address at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, New York, October, 1982.
2.
ArchambaultF.X., and GubbinsJ.An evaluation of Project Epic.Storrs, Ct.: Bureau of Educational Research, August, 1981.
3.
CallahanCM.CovertR., AylesworthM.S., and VancoP. Sea test. Evaluation Research Center and Department of Foundations of the University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, 1981.
4.
CampbellD.T., and StanleyJ.G.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1966.
5.
ColemanJ.S., CampbellE.Q., HobsonC.J., McPartlandJ.M., MoodA.M., WeinfieldF.D., and YorkR.L.Equality of educational opportunity.Washington: Government Printing Office, 1966.
6.
CookT.D., and CampbellD.T.Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings.Chicago: Rand-McNally, 1979.
7.
FlanaganJ.C., DavisF.B., DaileyJ.T., ShuycroftM.F., OrrD.B., GoldbergI., and NeymanC.A.Jr.Project Talent—The identification, development and utilization of human talents of the american high school student.Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press, 1964.
8.
HopkinsK.D.Estimating and attentuating variance from response styles, chance and other irrelevant sources. Educational and Psychological Measurement.1964, 24, 271–281.
9.
JuddCM. and KennyD.A.Estimating the effects of social interventions.New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
10.
LongJ.V., SchaffranJ.A., and KelloggT.M.Effects of out-of-level survey testing on reading achievement scores of Title I, ESEA students. Journal of Educational Measurement1977, 14, 203–213.
11.
LoydB.H., and HooverH.D.Vertical equating using the rasch model. Journal of Educational Measurement.1980, 17, 179–193.
12.
OzenneD.The effect of vertical scaling imprecision in the estimation of Title I project gains. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, 1978.
13.
RenzulliJ.S., ReisS.M., and SmithL.H.The revolving door identification model.Mansfield Center, Ct.: Creative Learning Press, 1981.
14.
RenzulliJ.S., and ReisS.M.Student product assessment form.Mansfield Center, Ct.: Creative Learning Press, 1981.
15.
RistR.C.Blitzkreig ethnography: On the transformation of a method into a movement. Educational Researcher. February 1980, 8–10.
16.
RossJ.D., and RossC.M.Ross test of higher cognitive processes.Novato, Ca.: Academic Therapy Publications, 1976.
17.
RobertsA.O.Out-of-level testing. (ESEA Title I Evaluation and Reporting System, Technical Paper No. 6). Mountain View, Ca.: RMC Research Corp., 1976.
18.
RobertsS.J.Test floor and ceiling effects. (ESEA Title I Evaluation and Reporting System, Technical Paper No. 15). Mountain View, Ca.: RMC Research Corp., 1978.
19.
RossiP.H., and FreemanH.E.Evaluation: A systematic approach.Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications, 1982.
20.
ScrrvenM.Product evaluation. In SmithN.L. (Ed.) New Techniques for Evaluation.Beverly Hills, Ca.: Sage Publications, 1981.
21.
SlindeJ.A., and LinnR.L.A Note on vertical scaling via the Rasch Model for groups of quite different ability and tests of quite different difficulty. Journal of Educational Measurement.1979, 16, 159–165.
22.
StanleyJ.S.Rationale of the Study of Mathematically Precious Youth (SMPY) during its first five years of promoting educational acceleration. In BarbeW.S., and RenzulliJ.S. (Eds.) Psychology and Education of the Gifted.New York, Irvington Publishers, 1981.
23.
StewartB.L.Interval articulation and Title I evaluation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, 1980.
24.
VaneckoJ.J., AmesN.L., and ArchambaultF.X.Jr.Who benefits from federal education dollars?Cambridge, Ma.: Abt Books, 1979.
25.
WilsonK.M., and DonlonT.F.Toward functional criteria for functional-level testing in Title I evaluation. In EchternachtC. (Ed.) Measurement Aspects of Title I Evaluations.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1980.