Gifted Children's Feelings about School and Themselves in Open and Open-Area Classes

Abstract

The School Sentiment Index and Piers-Harris Self-Concept scale were dependent variables for between 142 and 172 grades 4 and 6 pupils (sample size varied with the test). Their classes were rated on three measures of program openness and architectural plan, and a subsample of 18 students was labelled as gifted on the basis of at least two of three criteria: teacher nominations, standardized reading scores two or more years above grade level, and outstanding school performance. The main results were that these children thought well or poorly of school and themselves in all kinds of class environments much to the same extent as other children. Nontraditional settings did not systematically ill-serve them. Second, much more precise discriminations were possible using classrooms rather than schools as the unit of analysis, even within grade levels.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett

Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books, 1976.

Bissell

J.S.

Review of N. Bennett Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books, 1976. Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47, 214-218.

Blyth

W. A. C.

English primary education: A sociological description. Volume 1: Schools; Volume II: Background. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (New York: Humanities Press), 1967.

Conbach

L.J.

, & Snow

R.E.

Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions. New York: Irvington, 1977.

Featherstone

Review of N. Bennet Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books, 1976; Harvard Educational Review, 1977, 47, 218-221.

Hassett

J.D.

, & Weisberg

Open education: Alternatives within our tradition. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1972.

Moss

R.H.

Educational climates. Chapter 4 in Walberg

H.J.

(Ed.), Educational environments and effects: Evaluation policy, and productivity. Berkeley: McCutchan, 1979.

OECD/Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Building implications of the multi-option school. Paris: OECD Programme on Educational Building, 1975.

Piers

E.V.

, & Harris

D.B.

Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale: The way I feel about myself. Nashville: Counsellor Recordings and Tests, 1969.

10.

Rogers

, & Baron

Review of N. Bennet, Teaching styles and pupil progress. London: Open Books, 1976; Phi Delta Kappan, 1971, 58, 622–623.

11.

The School Sentiment Index. Los Angeles: Instructional Objectives Exchange, 1970.

12.

Spaulding

R.L.

An introduction to the use of the Coping Analysis Schedule for Educational Settings (CASES). In Simon

, & Boyer

(Eds.) Mirrors for behavior. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, Inc., 1967.

13.

Stephens

The teacher's guide to open education. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1974.

14.

U.S. Commissioner of Education. Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.

15.

U.S. Congress. Gifted and talented children's education act, October 15th, 1978, in TAG Update, 1978, 2(1), 1–2 and 4.

16.

Vernon

P.E.

, Adamson

, & Vernon

D.F.

The psychology and education of gifted children. London: Methuen, 1977.

17.

Walberg

H.J.

, & Thomas

S.C.

Characteristics of open education: Towards an operational definition. Newton, Mass.: TDR Associates, Inc., Contract No. DEC 1-71-062805-3936, 1971.