Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide recommendations for teacher preparation in gifted education to directors of inservice and university training programs. Recommendations were based on the responses of 1,220 kindergarten through 12th educators to a modified Likert attitude scale regarding gifted identification, programming, behavioral characteristics, and teacher recommendations for gifted programming and teacher preparation. Also investigated were the relationships between five teacher characteristics and attitudes toward the gifted/talented. The most salient teacher preparation needs were found to be: increasing the accuracy and scope of talent identification, acquiring accurate information regarding acceleration techniques and consequences, and encouraging creative and affective development of the gifted/talented. Significant differences in attitudes were related to number of years of teaching experience, grade level and gifted/talented inservice experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ciha

T. E.

Parents as identifiers of giftedness, ignored but accurate. Unpublished paper read at the National Association of Gifted Children Conference, St. Louis, Missouri, February, 1974.

Education of the Gifted and Talented Subcommittee on Labor and Public Welfare, U.S. Senate, March, 1972.

Executive Summary, Education of the Gifted and Talented, Vol. 1. Report of the Congress of the United States Commissioner of Education, 1971.

Gallagher

J. J.

Teaching the Gifted Child, 2nd Edition, Boston, Allyn and Bacon Inc., 1975.

Gear

H. G.

Accuracy of teacher judgment in identifying intellectually gifted children: A review of the literature. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 1976, XX, 478–490.

Gowan

J. C.

Demos

G. D.

The Education and Guidance of the Ablest. Springfield, Ill., C.C. Thomas, 1964.

Grinter

. Identification Processes. Presentation to the Wisconsin Council for the Gifted and Talented. February, 1975.

Karnes

F. A.

Collins

. Teacher certification in gifted education: A national survey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1977, XXI, (2), 204–206.

Keating

D. P.

(Ed.) Intellectual Talent: Research and Development. Baltimore, Md. 21218, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975.

10.

Kranz

Multi-Dimensional Screening Device (MDSD). Fairfax County Public Schools, 10700 Page Ave., Fairfax, Va. 22030, 1975.

11.

Malone

C. E.

Kindergarten Bliss: Not So—For Gifted the Beginning May Be the End. LaJolla, Ca.: Western Behavioral Institute, 1975.

12.

Martinson

Hermanson

Banks

An independent study seminar brilliant youths. Gifted Child Quarterly, 1976, XX, (1) 66–75.

13.

Meeker

. The Structure of the Intellect: Its Uses and Interpretations, Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill, 1969.

14.

Mitchell

P. B.

Erickson

D.K.

. The education of gifted and talented: A status report. Exceptional Child, September, 1978, pp. 12–16.

15.

Ogletree

E. J.

Are creativity tests valid in cultures outside the United States?. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 1971, 4, 129–130.

16.

Oppenheim

A. N.

Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1966.

17.

Pegnato

C. C.

Birch

J. W.

Locating gifted children in junior high schools: A comparison of methods. Exceptional Children, 1959, 25, 300–304.

18.

Renzulli

J. S.

The Enrichment Triad Model: A Guide for Developing Defensible Programs for the Gifted and Talented. Wethersfield, Conn.: Creative Learning Press, 1977.

19.

Renzulli

J. S.

Smith

L. H.

White

A. J.

Callahan

C. M.

Hartman

R. K.

Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students. Wethersfield, Conn.: Creative Learning Press, 1976.

20.

Stanley

J.C

. The case for extreme educational acceleration of intellectually program for the gifted. Exceptional Children, 1972, 5, 421–425.

21.

Yamamoto

. Validation of tests of creative thinking, a review of some studies. Exceptional Children, 1965, 31, 281–290.

Attitudes of 1,200 Educators toward the Education of the Gifted and Talented: Implications for Teacher Preparation

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References