Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This exploratory study investigated commonly relied-upon admissions data points to see if factors, such as graduation and early college entrance program GPA, predicted academic success. Data from nearly 800 students admitted over 11 years to a state-supported residential early college entrance program located at a large Southern university in the United States were utilized for this study. Logistic regression failed to yield a model that could accurately predict whether a student would graduate from the program. Multiple regression models showed that high school GPA and ACT scores were predictive of performance and that factors like locality and ethnicity can have predictive power as well. However, the low variance in performance explained by the variables included in this study demonstrates that commonly relied-upon admissions data only provide limited information about a student’s likelihood of success in an early college entrance program.

Keywords

academic achievement gifted education gifted programming

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACT . (2009). ACT-SAT concordance tables. https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/ACTCollegeBoardJointStatement.pdf

Arcidiacono

Kinsler

Ransom

(2022). Legacy and athlete preferences at Harvard. Journal of Labor Economics, 40(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1086/713744

Assouline

S. G.

(2015). University and college early entrance programs: Defining the issues through a definitive special issue. Roeper Review, 37(1), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.981109

Assouline

S. G.

Colangelo

VanTassel-Baska

Lupkowski-Shoplik

(2015). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students. In International center for gifted education and talent development. University of Iowa.

Boazman

Sayler

(2011). Personal well-being of gifted students following participation in an early college-entrance program. Roeper Review, 33(2), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2011.554153

Brody

L. E.

Assouline

S. G.

Stanley

J. C.

(1990). Five years of early entrants: Predicting successful achievement in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34(4), 138–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629003400402

Brody

L. E.

Lupkowski

A. E.

Stanley

J. C.

(1988). Early entrance to college: A study of academic and social adjustment during the freshman year. College and University, 63(4), 347–359.

Brody

L. E.

Muratori

M. C.

Stanley

J. C.

(2004). Early entrance to college: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In Colangelo

Assouline

S. G.

Gross

M. U. M.

(Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (2, pp. 97–107). The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

Cohen

(1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155

10.

Colangelo

Assouline

S. G.

Gross

M. U. M.

(2004). In A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (2). The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.

11.

Cornell

D. G.

Callahan

C. M.

Loyd

B. H.

(1991). Socioemotional adjustment of adolescent girls enrolled in a residential acceleration program. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(2), 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629103500202

12.

Cross

T. L.

Burney

V. H.

(2005). High ability, rural, and poor: Lessons from project aspire and implications for school counselors. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(4), 148–156. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2005-483

13.

Dai

D. Y.

(2015). Understanding and serving precocious youth across nations: Introduction to the special issue on early college entrance programs. Roeper Review, 37(1), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.975772

14.

Dai

D. Y.

Steenbergen-Hu

(2015). Special class for the gifted young: A 34-year experimentation with early college entrance programs in China. Roeper Review, 37(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.975882

15.

Espenshade

T. J.

Chung

C. Y.

Walling

J. L.

(2004). Admission preferences for minority students, athletes, and legacies at elite universities. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1422–1446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00284.x

16.

Feldhusen

J. F.

Jarwan

(1995). Predictors of academic success at state-supported residential schools for mathematics and science: A validity study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(3), 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055003018

17.

Ferguson

C. J.

(2009). An effect size primer: A guide for clinicians and researchers. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40(5), 532–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015808

18.

Flatt

Jacobs

R. L.

(2019). Principle assumptions of regression analysis: Testing, techniques, and statistical reporting of imperfect data sets. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 21(4), 484–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422319869915

19.

Golden

(2006). The price of admission: How America’s ruling class buys its way into elite colleges–and who gets left outside the gates. Crown Publishers.

20.

Halvorsen

Hertzog

N. B.

Childers

S. A.

(2013). University of Washington transition school: College preparation and teaching for transformation. Gifted Child Today, 36(3), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217513486648

21.

Heilbronner

N. N.

Connell

E. E.

Dobyns

S. M.

Reis

S. M.

(2010). The “stepping stone phenomenon”: Exploring the role of positive attrition at an early college entrance program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(3), 392–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X1002100303

22.

Hertzog

N. B.

Chung

R. U.

(2015). Outcomes for students on a fast track to college: Early college entrance programs at the University of Washington. Roeper Review, 37(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.976324

23.

Hertzog

N. B.

Lamb

K. N.

Mammadov

(2021). Parent perspectives on sending their children to college early. Journal of Advanced Academics, 32(4), 399–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X211007088

24.

Huey

E. L.

Sayler

M. F.

Rinn

A. N.

(2013). Effects of family functioning and parenting style on early entrants’ academic performance and program completion. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(4), 418–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213506066

25.

Ingersoll

K. S.

Cornell

D. G.

(1995). Social adjustment of female early college entrants in a residential program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235329501900104

26.

Janos

P. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Carter

Chapel

Cufley

Curland

Daily

Guilland

Heinzig

Kehl

Sherry

Stoloff

Wise

(1988). A cross-sectional developmental study of the social relations of students who enter college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32(1), 210–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628803200105

27.

Jett

Rinn

A. N.

(2019). Radically early college entrants on radically early college entrance: A heuristic inquiry. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(4), 303–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219874430

28.

Jett

Rinn

A. N.

(2020). Student experiences and outcomes of early college: A systematic review. Roeper Review, 42(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1728801

29.

Jones

B. M.

(2009). Profiles of state-supported residential math and science schools. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(3), 472–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902000305

30.

Jones

B. M.

(2011). The Texas academy of mathematics and science: A 20-year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(3), 513–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321103400307

31.

Jones

B. M.

(2014). Rejecting admission offers to a selective math and science school. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353214540825

32.

Jones

B. M.

Fleming

D. L.

Henderson

C. E.

(2002). Common denominators: Assessing hesitancy to apply to a selective residential math and science academy. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13(4), 164–172. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2002-378

33.

Jung

J. Y.

Young

Gross

M. U. M.

(2015). Early college entrance in Australia. Roeper Review, 37(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.976323

34.

Karnes

F. A.

Chauvin

J. C.

(1982). A survey of early admission policies for younger than average students: Implications for gifted youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(2), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628202600205

35.

Kettler

Puryear

J. S.

Mullet

D. R.

(2016). Defining rural in gifted education research: Methodological challenges and paths forward. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(4), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X16656896

36.

Kettler

Russell

Puryear

J. S.

(2015). Inequitable access to gifted education: Variance in funding and staffing based on locale and contextual school variables. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 38(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353215578277

37.

Lewis

K. D.

Boswell

(2020). Perceived challenges for rural gifted education. Gifted Child Today, 43(3), 184–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217520915742

38.

Lupkowski

A. E.

Schumacker

R. E.

(1991). Mathematics anxiety among talented students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20(6), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01537362

39.

Lupkowski

A. E.

Whitmore

Ramsay

(1992). The impact of early entrance to college on self-esteem: A preliminary study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600206

40.

Mammadov

Hertzog

N. B.

Mun

R. U.

(2018). An examination of self-determination within alumni of an early college entrance program. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 41(3), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353218781745

41.

Monks

(2000). The academic performance of legacies. Economic Letters, 67(1), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00207-4

42.

Mun

R. U.

Hertzog

N. B.

(2019). The influence of parental and self-expectations on Asian American women who entered college early. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(2), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218823559

43.

Muratori

M. C.

(2007). Early entrance to college: A guide to success. Prufrock Press.

44.

National Center for Education Statistics . (2021a). Education demographic and geographic estimates: Locale classifications. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/LocaleBoundaries

45.

National Center for Education Statistics . (2021b). Undergraduate retention and graduation rates: Condition of education. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/ctr

46.

Neihart

(2007). The socioaffective impact of acceleration and ability grouping: Recommendations for best practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 330–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207306319

47.

Noble

K. D.

Arndt

Nicholson

Sletten

Zamora

(1998). Different strokes: Perceptions of social and emotional development among early college entrants. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X9801000204

48.

Noble

K. D.

Childers

S. A.

Vaughan

R. C.

(2008). A place to be celebrated and understood: The impact of early university entrance from parents’ points of view. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319976

49.

Noble

K. D.

Drummond

J. E.

(1992). But what about the prom? Students’ perceptions of early college entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36(2), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600209

50.

Noble

K. D.

Robinson

N. M.

Gunderson

S. A.

(1993). All rivers lead to the sea: A follow-up study of gifted young adults. Roeper Review, 15(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553485

51.

Noble

K. D.

Smyth

R. K.

(1995). Keeping their talents alive: Young women’s assessment of radical, post-secondary acceleration. Roeper Review, 18(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553697

52.

Noble

K. D.

Vaughan

R. C.

Chan

Childers

Chow

Federow

Hughes

(2007). Love and work: The legacy of early university entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 152–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986207299472

53.

O’Connell

A. A.

Amico

K. R.

(2018). Logistic regression and extensions. In Hancock

G. R.

Stapleton

L. M.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (2nd ed., pp. 214–234). Routledge.

54.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(1998). Early entrance to college: Students’ stories. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10(1), 226–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X9801000103

55.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Subotnik

R. F.

Davis

L. C.

Worrell

F. C.

(2019). Benchmarking psychosocial skills important for talent development. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2019(168), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20318

56.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Subotnik

R. F.

Worrell

F. C.

(2015). Antecedent and concurrent psychosocial skills that support high levels of achievement within talent domains. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095077

57.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Subotnik

R. F.

Worrell

F. C.

(2016). Aiming talent development toward creative eminence in the 21st century. Roeper Review, 38(3), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2016.1184497

58.

Pendarvis

Wood

E. W.

(2009). Eligibility of historically underrepresented students referred for gifted education in a rural school district: A case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320903200403

59.

Rasheed

(2019). Context and content in rural gifted education: A literature review. Journal of Advanced Academics, 31(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X19879174

60.

Roberts

J. L.

(2013). The gatton academy: A case study of a state residential high school with a focus on mathematics and science. Gifted Child Today, 36(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217513486649

61.

Sayler

M. F.

(1995). Profiles of successful male and female early college entrants at a state-supported “high school”. Department of Educational Psychology, University of North Texas. [Unpublished internal report].

62.

Sayler

M. F.

(2015). Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science: 25 years of early college STEM opportunities. Roeper Review, 37(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.975773

63.

Schumacker

R. E.

Sayler

M. F.

Bembry

K. L.

(1995). Identifying at-risk gifted students in an early college entrance program. Roeper Review, 18(2), 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553713

64.

Sethna

B. N.

Wickstrom

C. D.

Boothe

Stanley

J. C.

(2001). The Advanced Academy of Georgia: Four years as a residential early-college-entrance program. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2001-360

65.

Shepard

S. J.

Nicpon

M. F.

Doobay

A. F.

(2009). Early entrance to college and self-concept: Comparisons across the first semester of enrollment. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X0902100103

66.

Stambaugh

Wood

S. M.

(Eds.), (2015). Serving gifted students in rural settings. Prufrock Press.

67.

Stanley

J. C.

(1985). Young entrants to college: How did they fare? College and University, 60(3), 219–228.

68.

Stanley

J. C.

(1991). A better model for residential high schools for talented youths. Phi Delta Kappan, 72(6), 471–473. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20404439

69.

Stanley

J. C.

Benbow

C. P.

(1983). Extremely young college graduates: Evidence of their success. College and University, 58(4), 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628603000205

70.

Tabachnick

B. G.

Fidell

L. S.

(1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). HarperCollins College Publishers.

71.

The Gatton Academy . (2023). School profile. https://www.wku.edu/academy/2023_college_profile.pdf

72.

Weinstein

C. E.

Palmer

Schulte

A. C.

(1987). LASSI user’s manual. H&H Publishing Company, Inc.

73.

Weisman

D. L.

(2016). Weeds in the Ivy: College admissions under preference constraints. Applied Economics, 49(3), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1197366

74.

Wilson

H. E.

(2021). Reflections on experiences at a residential science and math high school: An alumni survey. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(4), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211044750

75.

Worrell

F. C.

(2018). Motivation: A critical lever for talent development. In Olszewski-Kubilius

Subotnik

R. F.

Worrell

F. C.

(Eds.), Talent development as a framework for gifted education: Implications for best practices and applications in schools (pp. 253–279). Prufrock Press.

76.

Assouline

McClurg

V. M.

McCallum

R. S.

(2022). An investigation of an early college entrance program’s ability to impact intellectual and social development. Roeper Review, 44(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2022.2043503

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.19 MB

Predictors of Academic Success in an Early College Entrance Program

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material