Self-Regulated Learning and Motivation Among Gifted and High-Achieving Students in Science,Technology,Engineering,and Mathematics Disciplines: Examining Differences Between Students From Diverse Socioeconomic Levels

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is an active process that assists students in managing their thoughts, behaviors, and emotions to navigate their learning experiences successfully. The study examined the differences in motivation and SRL between gifted and high achievers (GHAs) and typical achievers (TAs) in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines by addressing the contribution of socioeconomic status (SES). A sample of 151 students in 11th and 12th grades from two high schools in Israel were divided into four study groups based on their general intelligence, school grades, and SES. Participants completed SRL and motivation questionnaires. The results indicated that among GHAs, all motivation measures were significantly higher than those of TAs, especially among students from low-SES environments. GHA students reported using more SRL strategies than TA students regarding organization, metacognition, time and learning environment, peer learning, and effort regulation. Students from low-SES environments reported using more organization strategies than those from high-SES environments, whereas TA students surpassed their GHA counterparts in critical thinking.

Keywords

giftedness motivation self-regulated learning science,technology,engineering,and mathematics disciplines

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abu-Hamour

Al-Hmouz

(2013). A study of gifted high, moderate, and low achievers in their personal characteristics and attitudes toward school and teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 28(3), 5–15.

Albert

R. S.

(1992). Genius and eminence: The social psychology of creativity and exceptional achievement (2nd ed.). Pergamon Press.

Al-Dhamit

Kreishan

(2016). Gifted students’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and parental influence on their motivation: From the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12048

Alexander

J. M.

Carr

Schwanenflugel

P. J.

(1995). Development of metacognition in gifted children: Directions for future research. Developmental Review, 15(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1995.1001

Ambrose

(2013). Socioeconomic inequality and giftedness: Suppression and distortion of high ability. Roeper Review, 35, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2013.766960

Ambrose

Van Tassel-Baska

Coleman

Cross

(2010). Unified, insular, firmly policed, or fractured, porous, contested, gifted education? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33(4), 453–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003300402

Assouline

S. G.

Colangelo

Ihrig

Forstadt

(2006). Attributional choices for academic success and failure by intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50(4), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620605000402

Bandura

(1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

Bandura

(1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3

10.

Barab

S. A.

Plucker

J. A.

(2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3703_3

11.

Ben-Eliyahu

(2019). A situated perspective on self-regulated learning from a person-by-context perspective. High Ability Studies, 30(1–2), 199–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1568828

12.

Bergold

Wirthwein

Steinmayr

(2020). Similarities and differences between intellectually gifted and average-ability students in school performance, motivation, and subjective well-being. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(4), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220932533

13.

Blass

(2018). The Israeli education system: An overview. Taub Center.

14.

Bloom

B. S.

(Ed.), (1985). Developing talent in young people. Ballantine Books.

15.

Bromberg

Theokas

(2014). Falling out of the lead: Following high achievers through high school and beyond. The Education Trust.

16.

Burns

E. C.

Martin

A. J.

(2019). Motivational issues in gifted education: Understanding the role of students’ attribution and control beliefs, self-worth protection, and growth orientation. In Smith

(Ed.), Handbook of giftedness and talent development in the Asia-Pacific (Online). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3021-6_15-1

17.

Byrnes

J. P.

Miller

D. C.

Reynolds

(1999). Learning to make good decisions: A self-regulation perspective. Child Development, 70(5), 1121–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00082

18.

Callan

G. L.

Marchant

G. J.

Finch

W. H.

German

R. L.

(2016). Metacognition, strategies, achievement, and demographics: Relationships across countries. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 16(5), 1485–1502. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.5.0137

19.

Carr

Taasoobshirazi

(2008). Metacognition in the gifted: Connections to expertise. In Shaughnessy

M. F.

Veenman

M. V. J.

Kleyn-Kennedy

(Eds.), Metacognition: A recent review of research, theory, and perspectives (pp. 109–125). NOVA.

20.

Cattell

R. B.

(1971). The structure of intelligence in relation to the nature-nurture controversy. In Cancro

(Ed), Intelligence: Genetic and environmental influences (pp. 3–30). Grune & Stratton.

21.

Chan

D. W.

(2000). Exploring identification procedures of gifted students by teacher ratings: Parent ratings and student self-reports in Hong Kong. High Ability Studies, 11(1), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/713669176

22.

Chan

L. K. S.

(1996). Motivational orientations and metacognitive abilities of intellectually gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40(4), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000403

23.

Cleary

T. J.

Kitsantas

(2017). Motivation and self-regulated learning influences on middle school mathematics achievement. School Psychology Review, 46(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2017.12087607

24.

Clinkenbeard

P. R.

(2012). Motivation and gifted students: Implications of theory and research. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 622–630. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21628

25.

Collins

K.H.

Joseph

Ford

D.Y.

(2019). Missing in action: Gifted, Black girls in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Gifted Child Today, 43(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1076217519880593

26.

Court

Abbas

(2010). Role of Druze high schools in Israel in shaping students' identity and citizenship. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 5(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197910370725

27.

Credé

Phillips

L. A.

(2011). A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002

28.

Creswell

J. W.

(2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design (3rd ed.). SAGE.

29.

Creswell

J. W.

Plano Clark

V. L.

Gutmann

Hanson

(2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In Tashakkori

Teddlie

(Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Sage.

30.

Cross

J. R.

Frazier

A. D.

Kim

Cross

T. L.

(2018). A comparison of perceptions of barriers to academic success among high-ability students from high- and low-income groups: Exposing poverty of a different kind. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738050

31.

David

(2014). Diagnosis of the gifted in Israel. Gifted Education International, 30(1), 87–90.

32.

Davis

G. A.

Rimm

S. B.

(2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

33.

Deci

Ryan

(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

34.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://10.1207/S15327965PLI110401

35.

Dent

A. L.

Koenka

A. C.

(2016). The relation between self-regulated learning and academicachievement across childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 28(3), 425–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9320-8

36.

DiBenedetto

M. K.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2010). Differences in self‐regulatory processes among students studying science: A microanalytic investigation. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 5(1), 2–24.

37.

DiFrancesca

Nietfeld

J. L.

Cao

(2016). A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.010

38.

Dittrich

(2014). Underachievement leading to downgrading at the highest level of secondary education in The Netherlands: A longitudinal case study. Roeper Review, 36(2), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2014.884201

39.

Dresel

Haugwitz

(2005). The relationship between cognitive abilities and self-regulated learning: Evidence for interactions with academic self-concept and gender. High Ability Studies, 16(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130600618066

40.

Dunlosky

Rawson

K. A.

Marsh

E. J.

Nathan

M. J.

Willingham

D. T.

(2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266

41.

Elbedour

Bart

W. M.

Hektner

(2003). Intelligence and family marital structure: The case of adolescents from monogamous and polygamous families among Bedouin Arabs in Israel. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540309598433

42.

Evans

G. W.

Schamberg

M. A.

(2009). Childhood poverty, chronic stress, and adult working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(16), 6545–6549. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0811910106

43.

Feniger

Livneh

Yogev

(2012). Globalisation and the politics of international tests: The case of Israel. Comparative Education, 48(3), 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2011.622539

44.

Gagné

(2004). Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory. High Ability Studies, 15(2), 119–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359813042000314682

45.

Gagné

(2010). Motivation within the DGMT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21(2), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2010.525341

46.

Gagné

(2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025007614869

47.

Garcia

Pintrich

P. R.

Paul

(1992). Critical thinking and its relationship to motivation, learning strategies and classroom experience. Paper presented at the 100th annual meeting of the. American Psychological Association.

48.

Gardner

(1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books.

49.

Garn

A. C.

Jolly

J. L.

(2014). High ability students’ voice on learning motivation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X13513262

50.

Garner

(1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004517

51.

Gottfried

A. E.

(2019). Academic intrinsic motivation: Theory, assessment, and longitudinal research (6, pp. 71–109). Advances in motivation science: Elsevier.

52.

Greene

J. A.

Azevedo

(2010). The measurement of learners' self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer-based learning environments. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.515935

53.

Guilford

J. P.

(1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14(8), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046827

54.

Handayani

N. D.

Mantra

I. B. N.

Suwandi

I. N.

(2019). Integrating collaborative learning in cyclic learning sessions to promote students’ reading comprehension and critical thinking. International Research Journal of Management, IT and Social Sciences, 6(5), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n5.777

55.

Hänze

Berger

(2007). Cooperative learning, motivational effects, and student characteristics: An experimental study comparing cooperative learning and direct instruction in 12th grade physics classes. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.004

56.

Hernandez

P. R.

Schultz

Estrada

Woodcock

Chance

R. C.

(2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 89–107. https://10.1037/a0029691

57.

Hitchcock

Hughes

(1995). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research. Routledge.

58.

M. T.

V. P.

Nguyen

M. H.

Pham

T. H.

Vuong

T. T.

Vuong

H. M.

Pham

Q. H.

Hoang

A.-D.

Vuong

Q.-H.

(2020). An analytical view on STEM education and outcomes: Examples of the social gap and gender disparity in Vietnam. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105650

59.

Hong

Aqui

(2004). Cognitive and motivational characteristics of adolescents gifted in mathematics: Comparisons among students with different types of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48(3), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620404800304

60.

Honicke

Broadbent

Fuller-Tyszkiewicz

(2020). Learner self-efficacy, goal orientation, and academic achievement: Exploring mediating and moderating relationships. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1685941

61.

Hunt

(2010). Human intelligence. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781308

62.

Israel Central Bureau of Statistics . (2022a). The Druze population of Israel. On the occasion of the nabi shu’ayb festival 2022 . https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/mediarelease/DocLib/2022/131/11_22_131e.pdf

63.

Israel Central Bureau of Statistics . (2022b). https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/Pages/default.aspx

64.

Ivankova

N. V.

Creswell

J. W.

Stick

S. L.

(2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.10.1177/1525822X05282260

65.

Kadioglu-Akbulut

Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci

(2021). Implementation of self-regulatory instruction to promote students’ achievement and learning strategies in the high school chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RP00297A

66.

Komarraju

Nadler

(2013). Self-efficacy and academic achievement: Why do implicit beliefs, goals, and effort regulation matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.005

67.

Koshy

Ernest

Casey

(2009). Mathematically gifted and talented learners: Theory and practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 213–228.

68.

Krutetskii

V. A.

(Ed), (1976). The psychology of mathematical abilities in schoolchildren. The University of Chicago Press.

69.

Leikin

(2014). Challenging mathematics with multiple solution tasks and mathematical investigations in geometry. In Transforming mathematics instruction (pp. 59–80). Springer.

70.

Leikin

(2018). Giftedness and high ability in mathematics. In Lerman

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (pp. 315–325). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_65-4

71.

Lens

Rand

(2000). Motivation and cognition. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Sternberg

R. J.

Subotnik

R. F.

(Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 193–202). Elsevier.

72.

Lüftenegger

Kollmayer

Bergsmann

Jöstl

Spiel

Schober

(2015). Mathematically gifted students and high achievement: The role of motivation and classroom structure. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095075

73.

Malpass

J. R.

O’Neil

H. F.

Hocevar

Jr. (1999). Self‐regulation, goal orientation, self‐efficacy, worry, and high‐stakes math achievement for mathematically gifted high school students. Roeper Review, 21(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553976

74.

Marland

S. P.

Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Government Printing Office.

75.

McLoyd

V. C.

(1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American psychologist, 53(2), 185, 204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.185

76.

Meece

J. L.

Anderman

E. M.

Anderman

L. H.

(2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070258

77.

Mega

Ronconi

De Beni

(2014). What makes a good student? How emotions, self-regulated learning, and motivation contribute to academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546

78.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

(1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Sage.

79.

Miller

J. D.

Kimmel

L. G.

(2012). Pathways to a STEMM profession. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2012.642274

80.

Muis

K. R.

Winne

P. H.

Jamieson-Noel

(2007). Using a multitrait-multimethod analysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulated learning inventories. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(1), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X90876

81.

National Association for Gifted Children (2019). Pre-K– grade 12 standards introduction. http://www.nagc.org/index.aspx?id=546

82.

Ngiamsunthorn

P. S.

(2020). Promoting creative thinking for gifted students in undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i1.9675

83.

Nisan

(2010). The Druze in Israel: Questions of identity, citizenship, and patriotism. The Middle East Journal, 64(4), 575–596. https://doi.org/10.3751/64.4.14

84.

Obergriesser

Stoeger

(2015). The role of emotions, motivation, and learning behavior in underachievement and results of an intervention. High Ability Studies, 26(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1043003

85.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Corwith

(2018). Poverty, academic achievement, and giftedness: A literature review. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738015

86.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Steenbergen-Hu

Thomson

Rosen

(2017). Minority achievement gaps in STEM. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216673449

87.

Oppong

Shore

B. M.

Muis

K. R.

(2019). Clarifying the connections among giftedness, metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning: Implications for theory and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(2), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986218814008

88.

Panadero

(2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

89.

Pappas

Ginsburg

H. P.

Jiang

(2003). SES differences in young children's metacognition in the context of mathematical problem solving. Cognitive Development, 18, 431–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(03)00043-1

90.

Paz-Baruch

(2017). Educational and learning capital of Israeli students with high achievements in mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(4), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353217737186

91.

Paz-Baruch

Leikin

(2016). Visual processing in generally gifted and mathematically excelling adolescents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(3), 237–258.

92.

Paz-Baruch

Leikin

(2022). Not just any gifted is an expert in mathematics and not just any expert in mathematics is gifted. Gifted and Talented International, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2021.2010244

93.

Peters

S. J.

Engerrand

K. G.

(2016). Equity and excellence: Proactive efforts in the identification of underrepresented students for gifted and talented services. Gifted Child Quarterly, 60(3), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216643165

94.

Pfeiffer

S. I.

(2012). Current perspectives on the identification and assessment of gifted students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911428192

95.

Phillips

Lindsay

(2006). Motivation in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 17(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130600947119

96.

Pintrich

P. R.

(2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In Boekaerts

Pintrich

P. R.

Zeidner

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). Academic. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50043-3

97.

Pintrich

P. R.

De Groot

E. V.

(1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

98.

Pintrich

P. R.

Smith

D. A. F.

Garcia

McKeachie

W. J.

(1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

99.

Pintrich

P. R.

Zusho

(2002). The development of academic self-regulation. In Wigfield

Eccles

J. S.

(Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249–284). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012750053-9/50012-7

100.

Plucker

J. A.

Callahan

C. M.

(2014). Research on giftedness and gifted education. Exceptional Children, 80(4), 390–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914527244

101.

Raven

J. C.

Court

J. H.

Raven

(1996). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. Oxford Psychologists’ Press.

102.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180–184.

103.

Renzulli

J. S.

(2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170208400109

104.

Reyes

M. R.

Brackett

M. A.

Rivers

S. E.

White

Salovey

(2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700–712. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027268

105.

Ricciardi

Haag-Wolf

Winsler

(2020). Factors associated with gifted identification for ethnically diverse children in poverty. Gifted Child Quarterly, 64(4), 243–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986220937685

106.

Ridgley

L. M.

DaVia Rubenstein

Callan

G. L.

(2020). Gifted underachievement within a self‐regulated learning framework: Proposing a task‐dependent model to guide early identification and intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 57(9), 1365–1384. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22408

107.

Ridgley

L. M.

DaVia Rubenstein

Callan

G. L.

(2022). Are gifted students adapting their self-regulated learning processes when experiencing challenging tasks? Gifted Child Quarterly, 66(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/00169862211025

108.

Rinn

A. N.

Boazman

Jackson

Barrio

(2014). Locus of control, academic self-concept, and academic dishonesty among high ability college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(4), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.14434/v14i4.12770

109.

Risemberg

Zimmerman

B. J.

(1992). Self‐regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15(2), 98–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199209553476

110.

Robinson

Clinkenbeard

P. R.

(1998). Giftedness: An exceptionality examined. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.117

111.

Scager

Akkerman

S. F.

Pilot

Wubbels

(2014). Challenging high-ability students. Studies in Higher Education, 39(4), 659–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.743117

112.

Schunk

D. H.

(2005). Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_3

113.

Schunk

D. H.

Ertmer

P. A.

(2000). Self-regulation and academic learning In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 631–649). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50048-2

114.

Schunk

D. H.

Pintrich

P. R.

Meece

J. L.

(2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.

115.

Schunk

D. H.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(Eds.), (2012). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media.

116.

Shore

B. M.

Kanevsky

L. S.

(1993). Thinking processes: Being and becoming gifted. In Heller

K. A.

Mönks

F. J.

Passow

A. H.

(Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 131–145). Pergamon.

117.

Siegle

Rubenstein

L. D. V.

Pollard

Romey

(2010). Exploring the relationship of college freshmen honors students' effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986209355975

118.

Snyder

K. E.

Carrig

M. M.

Linnenbrink-Garcia

(2019). Developmental pathways in underachievement. Applied Developmental Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1543028

119.

Sontag

Stoeger

(2015). Can highly intelligent and high-achieving students benefit from training in self-regulated learning in a regular classroom context? Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.07.008

120.

Sontag

Stoeger

Harder

(2012). The relationship between intelligence and the preference for self-regulated learning: A longitudinal study with fourth-graders. Talent Development & Excellence, 4(1), 1–22.

121.

Spradley

(2003). Asking descriptive questions. In Pogrebin

(Ed.), Qualitative approaches to criminal justice: Perspectives from the field (pp. 44–61). Sage.

122.

Sternberg

R. J.

(1997). The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1030–1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1030

123.

Sternberg

R. J.

(2019). Teaching and assessing gifted students in STEM disciplines through the augmented theory of successful intelligence. High Ability Studies, 30(1–2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1528847

124.

Sternberg

R. J.

Davidson

J. E.

(Eds.), (2005). Conceptions of giftedness. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455

125.

Stoeger

Fleischmann

Obergriesser

(2015). Self-regulated learning (SRL) and the gifted learner in primary school: The theoretical basis and empirical findings on a research program dedicated to ensuring that all students learn to regulate their own learning. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(2), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-015-9376-7

126.

Stoeger

Steinbach

Obergriesser

Matthes

(2014). What is more important for fourth-grade primary school students for transforming their potential into achievement: The individual or the environmental box in multidimensional conceptions of giftedness? High Ability Studies, 25(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.914381

127.

Stoeger

Ziegler

(2013). Deficits in fine motor skills and its influence on persistence among gifted elementary school pupils. Gifted Education International, 29(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429412440649

128.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

F. C.

(2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611418056

129.

Sumida

(2013). Emerging trends in Japan in education of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213493534

130.

Taber

K. S.

(Ed.), (2007). Science education for gifted learners. Routledge.

131.

Taber

K. S.

(2015). Developing a research programme in science education for gifted learners. In Yates

N. L.

(Ed.), New developments in science education research (pp. 1–29). Nova Science Publishers.

132.

Tate

W. F.

Jones

B. D.

Thorne-Wallington

Hogrebe

M. C.

(2012). Science and the city. Urban Education, 47(2), 399–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085911429974

133.

Taylor

(2012). Review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ) using reliability generalization techniques to assess scale reliability (Doctoral dissertation).

134.

Terman

L. M.

(1916). The measurement of intelligence: An explanation of and a complete guide for the use of the Stanford revision and extension of the Binet-Simon intelligence scale. Houghton Mifflin.

135.

Uçar

F. M.

(2018). Investigation of gifted students epistemological beliefs, self-efficacy beliefs and use of metacognition. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(3), 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2018.77

136.

VanTassel-Baska

(2018). Achievement unlocked: Effective curriculum interventions with low-income students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(1), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217738565

137.

VanTassel-Baska

Feng

A. X.

Swanson

J. D.

Quek

Chandler

(2009). Academic and affective profiles of low income, minority, and twice-exceptional gifted learners: The role of gifted program membership in enhancing self. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 709–739.

138.

Warne

R. T.

Anderson

Johnson

A. O.

(2013). The impact of race and ethnicity on the identification process for giftedness in Utah. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36(4), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353213506065

139.

Webb

J. T.

(2014). Gifted children and adults: Neglected areas of practice. The National Register of Health Service Psychologists. The Register Report, 18–27.

140.

Winne

P. H.

(2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45(4), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2010.517150

141.

Wirthwein

Bergold

Preckel

Steinmayr

(2019). Personality and school functioning of intellectually gifted and nongifted adolescents: Self-perceptions and parents’ assessments. Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.04.003

142.

Worrell

F. C.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Dixson

D. D.

(2019). Gifted students. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(1), 551–576. https://10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102846

143.

Yerdelen-Damar

Peşman

(2013). Relations of gender and socioeconomic status to physics through metacognition and self-efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(4), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.692729

144.

Zeidner

(2019). Self-regulated learning: Current fissures, challenges, and directions for future research. High Ability Studies, 30(1–2), 255–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2019.1584034

145.

Ziegler

(2005). The actiotope model of giftedness. In Sternberg

Davidson

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 411–436). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610455.024

146.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2000). Attaining self-regulation. In Boekaerts

Pintrich

P. R.

Zeidner

(Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13–39). Academic.

147.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

148.

Zimmerman

B. J.

(2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909

149.

Zimmerman

B. J.

Pons

M. M.

(1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614–628. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312023004614