High Expectations,Limited Options: How Gifted Students Living in Poverty Approach the Demands of AP Coursework

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the lived experiences of advanced students who live in poverty and their choices regarding taking Advanced Placement (AP) courses. Ten urban high school students were interviewed regarding their decision-making process regarding coursework to investigate supports or barriers that exist. Four themes became apparent: Gifted students take advanced classes for challenge and to decrease boredom; internalized messages about what it means to be smart influenced decisions regarding taking advanced classes; external influences could apply positive or negative pressure that affect the decision to take AP courses; and it is difficult for gifted students to find balance between the stress of the AP workload and time management with working and trying to fit in other interests. The themes reflected the complex interplay of internal and external forces that influence whether or not students take AP courses regardless of high academic ability.

Keywords

secondary schools advanced placement gifted education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2012). “They think minority means lesser than”: Black middle-class sons and fathers resisting microaggressions in the school. Urban Education, 48(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085912450575

Barber

Wasson

J. W.

(2015). A comparison of adolescents’ friendship networks by advanced coursework participation status. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986214559639

Bronfenbrenner

(1986). Ecology of the family as context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 723–742.

Burney

V. H.

Beilke

J. R.

(2008). Constraints of poverty on high achievement. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(3), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2008-771

Cilesz

Drotos

(2016). High-poverty urban high school students’ plans for higher education: Weaving their own safety nets. Urban Education, 51(1), 3–31. http://doi.org/10.1177/0042085914543115

College Board. (2019). AP at a glance. https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/about-ap/ap-a-glance

Diamond

(2000). Beyond social class: Cultural resources and educational participation among low-income Black parents. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 44, 15–54.

Erikson

E. H.

(1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton & Co.

Ford

Whiting

(2010). Beyond testing: Social and psychological considerations in recruiting and retaining gifted Black students. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 34(1), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235321003400106

10.

Foust

R. C.

Hertberg-Davis

Callahan

C. M.

(2008). “Having it all” at sleep’s expense: The forced choice of participants in advanced placement courses and International Baccalaureate programs. Roeper Review, 30(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190801955293

11.

Foust

R. C.

Hertberg-Davis

Callahan

C. M.

(2009). Students’ perceptions of the non-academic advantages and disadvantages of participation in advanced placement courses and International Baccalaureate programs. Adolescence, 44(174), 289–312.

12.

Hardesty

McWilliams

Plucker

J. A.

(2014). Excellence gaps: What they are, why they are bad, and how smart contexts can address them . . . or make them worse. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2014.907646

13.

Henfield

Moore

I. I. I.

Wood

(2008). Inside and outside gifted education programming: Hidden challenges for African American students. Exceptional Children, 74(7), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290807400402

14.

Henfield

Woo

Bang

N. M.

(2017). Gifted ethnic minority students and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 61(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986216674556

15.

Hertberg-Davis

Callahan

C. M.

(2008). A narrow escape: Gifted students’ perceptions of advanced placement and International Baccalaureate programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986208319705

16.

Macartney

Bishaw

Fontenot

(2013). Poverty rates for selected detailed race and Hispanic groups by state and place: 2007–2011. https://www2.census.gov/library/publications/2013/acs/acsbr11-17.pdf

17.

Merriam

(1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass.

18.

Milner

H. R.

Murray

I. E.

Farine

A. A.

Delale-O’Connor

(2015). Outside of school matters: What we need to know in urban environments. Equity & Excellence in Education, 48(4), 529–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2015.1085798

19.

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2003). Do we change gifted children to fit gifted programs or change gifted programs to fit gifted children? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(4), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.4219/jeg-2003-308

20.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Subotnik

Worrell

(2015). Antecedent and concurrent psychosocial skills that support high levels of achievement within talent domains. High Ability Studies, 26(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2015.1095077

21.

Reis

S. M.

Colbert

R. D.

Hébert

T. D.

(2005). Understanding resilience in diverse, talented students in an urban high school. Roeper Review, 27(2), 110–120.

22.

Saldaña

(2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

23.

Shaunessy-Dedrick

Suldo

S. M.

Roth

R. A.

Fefer

S. A.

(2015). Students’ perceptions of factors that contribute to risk and success in accelerated high school courses. The High School Journal, 98(2), 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2015.0002

24.

Siegle

Gubbins

E. J.

O’Rourke

Langely

S. D.

Mun

R. U.

Luria

S. R.

Little

C. A.

McCoach

D. B.

Knupp

Callahan

C. M.

Plucker

J. A.

(2016). Barriers to underserved students’ participation in gifted programs and possible solutions. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 103–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353216640930

25.

Steenbergen-Hu

Olszewski-Kubilius

(2017). Factors that contributed to gifted students’ success on STEM pathways: The role of race, personal interests, and aspects of high school experience. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 40(2), 99–134. https://doi.org/10.1170/0162353217701022

26.

Stormont

Stebbins

Holiday

(2001). Characteristics and educational support needs of underrepresented gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 38(5), 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.1030

27.

Subotnik

R. F.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Worrell

(2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56(4), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986212456079

28.

Suldo

S. M.

Shaunessy-Dedrick

(2013). The psychosocial functioning of high school students in academically rigorous programs. Psychology in the Schools, 50(8), 823–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21708

29.

Szymanski

(2011). Pathways toward progress: Examining the relationships among racial identity, academic intrinsic motivation, and perceived support on African Americans students’ academic achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 72(12–A), Article 4421.

30.

Tomlinson

C. A.

Jarvis

J. M

. (2014). Case studies of success: Supporting academic success for students with high potential from ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(3), 191–219.

31.

Xiang

Dahlin

Cronin

Theaker

Durant

(2011). Do original high flyers maintain their altitude? Performance trends of top students. Thomas Fordham Institute, Northwest Evaluation Association.