Empirical studies investigating twice-exceptional students’ learning experiences and intricate needs remain scarce to date. Even though highly able learners with autism spectrum disorder (ASDs) demonstrate potential for high achievement and/or creative productivity, they also face potential psychosocial distresses such as anxiety disorders and poor self-concept. This study aimed to explore positive educational opportunities for highly able learners diagnosed with ASD. Using a success case method, the researchers invited two fifth-grade highly able learners with ASD to participate in this study. Data collection included interviews, observations, questionnaires, and supplementary artifacts. Adopting a general inductive analysis approach and a Glaserian coding paradigm, the researchers identified a core category, supportive school context (SSC), along with three subcategories: (a) curriculum flexibility, (b) strength-based approaches, and (c) safe environment. The findings could provide effective pedagogical strategies for teachers, school administrators, and parents. Furthermore, we rendered several suggestions for future research.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
2.
AspergerH. (1944). Die “autistischen Psychopathen” im Kindesalter. Archiv fur Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten, 117, 76–136 [Autistic psychopathy in childhood] In FrithU. (Ed., Trans.) (1991), Autism and Asperger syndrome (pp. 37–92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AssoulineS. G.Foley NicponM.DockeryL. (2012). Predicting the academic achievement of gifted students with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 1781–1789. doi:10.1007/s10803-011-1403-x
4.
AssoulineS. G.Foley NicponM.DoobayA. (2009). Profoundly gifted girls and autism spectrum disorder: A psychometric case study comparison. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 89–105. doi:10.1177/0016986208330565
5.
AssoulineS. G.WhitemanC. S. (2011). Twice-exceptionality: Implications for school psychologists in the post-IDEA 2004 era. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 27, 380–402. doi:10.1080/15377903.2011.616576
6.
BarnhillG.HagiwaraT.MylesB. S.SimpsonR. L. (2000). Asperger syndrome: A study of the cognitive profiles of 37 children and adolescents. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15, 146–153.
7.
BaumS. M.CooperC. R.NeuT. W. (2001). Dual differentiation: An approach for meeting the curricular needs of gifted students with learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 477–490. doi:10.1002/pits.1036
8.
BaumS. M.OwenS. (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different?Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 226–230. doi:10.1177/001698628803200305
9.
BaumS. M.OwenS. V.DixonJ. (1991). To be gifted and learning disabled. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
10.
BaumS. M.SchaderR. M.HébertT. P. (2014). Through a different lens: Reflecting on a strengths-based, talent-focused approach for twice-exceptional learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 311–327. doi:10.1177/0016986214547632
11.
BaumeisterR.LearyM. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
12.
BethuneK. S.WoodC. L. (2013). Effects of wh-question graphic organizers on reading comprehension skills of students with autism spectrum disorders. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48, 236–244.
13.
BiancoM.CarothersD.SmileyL. R. (2009). Gifted students with Asperger syndrome: Strategies for strength-based programming. Intervention in School and Clinic, 44, 206–215. doi:10.1177/1053451208328827
14.
BiancoM.LeechN. L. (2010). Twice-exceptional learners: Effects of teacher preparation and disability labels on gifted referrals. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 33, 319–334. doi:10.1177/0888406409356392
15.
BrinkerhoffR. O. (2003). The success case method: Find out quickly what’s working and what’s not. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.
16.
CarnahanC. R.WilliamsonP. S. (2013). Does compare-contrast text structure help students with autism spectrum disorder comprehend science text?Exceptional Children, 79, 347–363. doi:10.1177/001440291307900302
17.
CarringtonS.TempletonE.PapinczakT. (2003). Adolescents with Asperger syndrome and perceptions of friendship. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 211–218. doi:10.1177/10883576030180040201
18.
CashA. B. (1999). A profile of gifted individuals with autism: The twice-exceptional learner. Roeper Review, 22, 22–27. doi:10.1080/02783199909553993
19.
ChongW. H. (2005). The role of self-regulation and personal agency beliefs: A psychoeducational approach with Asian high school students in Singapore. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 30, 343–361. doi:10.1080/01933920500184964
20.
CottonK. (1996). School size, school climate, and student performance (School Improvement Research Series, Close-up #20). Retrieved from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/10/c020.html
DuanX.ShiJ.ZhouD. (2010). Developmental changes in processing speed: Influence of accelerated education for gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 85–91. doi:10.1177/0016986209355971
23.
EricksonF.ShultzJ. (1992). Students’ experience of the curriculum. In JacksonP. W. (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 465–485). New York, NY: Macmillan.
24.
Foley NicponM.AllmonA.SieckB.StinsonR. D. (2011). Empirical investigation of twice-exceptionality: Where have we been and where are we going?Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 3–17. doi:10.1177/0016986210382575
25.
Foley NicponM.AssoulineS. G.StinsonR. D. (2012). Cognitive and academic distinctions between gifted students with autism and Asperger Syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 77–89. doi:10.1177/0016986211433199
26.
Foley NicponM.DoobayA. F.AssoulineS. G. (2010). Parent, teacher, and self-perceptions of psychosocial functioning in intellectually gifted children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 1028–1038. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0952-8
27.
GallagherJ. (2003). Issues and challenges in the education of the gifted. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 11–23). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
28.
GivenL. M. (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
29.
GlaserB. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs. forcing. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
30.
GlaserB. G. (1998). Doing grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
31.
GubbelsJ.SegersE.VerhoevenL. (2014). Cognitive, socio-emotional and attitudinal effects of a triarchic enrichment program for gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37, 378–397. doi:10.1177/0162353214552565
32.
HansfordS. J. (1987). Intellectually gifted learning disabled students: A special study. Washington, DC: Educational Information Center, U.S. Department of Education.
33.
HarrisL. R. (2008). A phenomenographic investigation of teacher conceptions of student engagement in learning. Australian Educational Researcher, 5, 57–79. doi:10.1007/BF03216875
34.
HatchJ. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in educational settings. Albany: State University of New York Press.
35.
HuaC. B. (2002). Career self-efficacy of the student who is gifted/learning disabled: A case study. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 25, 375–404. doi:10.4219/jeg-2002-282
36.
KanevskyL. (2011). Differential differentiation: What types of differentiation do students want?Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 279–299. doi:10.1177/0016986211422098
37.
KoegelR. L.FredeenR.KimS.DanialJ.RubinsteinD.KoegelL. (2012). Using perseverative interests to improve interactions between adolescents with autism and their typical peers in school settings. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 14, 133–141. doi:10.1177/1098300712437043
38.
KoegelR. L.KimS.KoegelL.SchwartzmanB. (2013). Improving socialization for high school students with ASD by using their preferred interests. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 2121–2134. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1765-3
39.
LeffertN.BensonP. L.RoehlkepartainJ. L. (1997). Starting out right: Developmental assets for children. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute.
40.
LewinK. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
41.
Linn-CohenR.HertzogN. B. (2007). Unlocking the GATE to differentiation: A qualitative study of two self-contained gifted classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 31, 227–259. doi:10.4219/jeg-2007-677
42.
LoC. O. (2014a). Labeling and knowing: A reconciliation of implicit theory and explicit theory among students with exceptionalities. Journal of Educational Research, 107, 281–298. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.807490
43.
LoC. O. (2014b). Enhancing groundedness in realist grounded theory research. Qualitative Psychology, 1, 61–76. doi:10.1037/qup0000001
44.
LoC. O. (2016). Literature integration: An illustration of theoretical sensitivity in grounded theory studies. Humanistic Psychologist, 44, 177–189. doi:10.1037/hum0000029
45.
LovelandK. A.Tunali-KotoskiB. (2005). The school-age child with an autism spectrum disorder. In VolkmarF. R.PaulR.KlinA.CohenD. (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (3rd ed., pp. 247–287). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
46.
LupartJ. L.ToyR. E. (2009). Twice exceptional: Multiple pathways to success. In ShavininaL. (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (3rd ed., pp. 507–525). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
47.
MakerC. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
48.
MakerC. J.NielsonA. B. (1995). Teaching/learning models in education of the gifted (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
49.
MakerC. J.SchieverS. W. (2010). Curriculum development and teaching strategies for gifted learners (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
50.
MesibovG. B.SheaV. (2010). The TEACCH program in the era of evidence-based practice. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 570–579. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0901-6
51.
NeihartM. (2000). Gifted children with Asperger’s syndrome. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 222–230. doi:10.1177/001698620004400403
NielsenM. E.HigginsL. D. (2005). The eye of the storm: Services and programs for twice-exceptional learners. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38, 8–15. doi:10.1177/004005990503800102
54.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
ReisS. M.BaumS. M.BurkeE. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 217–230. doi:10.1177/0016986214534976
56.
ReisS. M.McGuireJ. M.NeuT. W. (2000). Compensation strategies used by high-ability students with learning disabilities who succeed in college. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 123–134. doi:10.1177/001698620004400205
57.
ReisS. M.NeuT. W.McGuireJ. M. (1997). Case studies of high-ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Exceptional Children, 63, 463–479. doi:10.1177/001440299706300403
58.
RubensteinL. D.PiersonE. E.WilczynskiS. M.ConnollyS. C. (2013). Fitting the high ability program to the needs of individuals with autism spectrum disorders: High ability and ASD. Psychology in the Schools, 50, 910–922. doi:10.1002/pits.21719
59.
SchaalS.BognerF. X. (2005). Human visual perception—Learning at workstations. Journal of Biological Education, 40, 32–37. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9656006
60.
SchapsE.BattistichV.SolomonD. (1997). School as a caring community: A key to character. In MolnarA. (Ed.), The construction of children’s character: Ninety-sixth yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (pp. 127–139). Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education.
61.
SchultzS. M. (2012). Twice-exceptional students enrolled in advanced placement classes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 119–133. doi:10.1177/0016986212444605
62.
SeligmanM. E. P.CsikszentmihalyiM. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14. doi:10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_18
63.
ShaunessyE.FarmerJ. (2006). Teaching gifted learners who have Asperger syndrome. Understanding Our Gifted, 18(4), 7–10.
64.
ShawerS. F.GilmoreD. G.Banks-JosephS. R. (2008). Student cognitive and affective development in the context of classroom-level curriculum development. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8, 1–28.
65.
Simons-MortonB. G.CrumpA. D.HaynieD. L.SaylorK. E. (1999). Student–school bonding and adolescent problem behavior. Health Education Research, 14, 99–107. doi:10.1093/her/14.1.99
66.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67.
Steenbergen-HuS.MoonS. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 39–53. doi:10.1177/0016986210383155
68.
SturmH.BognerF. (2008). Student-oriented versus teacher-centred: The effect of learning at workstations about birds and bird flight on cognitive achievement and motivation. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 941–959. doi:10.1080/09500690701313995
69.
TerjesenM. D.JacofskyM. D.FrohJ. J.DiGiuseppeR. A. (2004). Integrating positive psychology into schools: Implications for practice. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 163–172. doi:10.1002/pits.10148
70.
ThomasD. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27, 237–246. doi:10.1177/1098214005283748
71.
TissotC.EvansR. (2003). Visual teaching strategies for children with autism. Early Child Development and Care, 173, 425–433. doi:10.1080/0300443032000079104
72.
TomlinsonC. A.JarvisJ. (2009). Differentiation: Making curriculum work for all students through responsive planning and instruction. In RenzulliJ. S.GubbinsE. J.McMillenK. S.EckertR. D.LittleC. A. (Eds.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 599–628). Storrs, CT: Creative Learning Press.
73.
VaughnS. (1989). Gifted learning disabilities: Is it such a bright idea?Learning Disabilities Focus, 4, 123–128.
74.
VoglK.PreckelF. (2014). Full-time ability grouping of gifted students’ impacts on social self-concept and school-related attitudes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 51–68. doi:10.1177/0016986213513795
75.
WebbJ. T.AmendE. R.WebbN. E.GoerssJ.BeljanP.OlenchakF. R. (2005). Misdiagnosis and dual diagnoses of gifted children and adults: ADHD, bipolar, OCD, Asperger’s, depression, and other disorders. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
76.
WechslerD. (2003). The Wechsler intelligence scale for children—4th edition (WISC-IV). Bloomington, MN: Pearson.
WillmsJ. D.FriesenS.MiltonP. (2009). What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic and intellectual engagement. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Education Association.
79.
WinebrennerS. (2003). Teaching strategies for twice-exceptional students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 38, 131–137. doi:10.1177/10534512030380030101
80.
Winter-MessiersM. A. (2007). From tarantulas to toilet brushes: Understanding the special interest areas of children and youth with Asperger syndrome. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 140–152. doi:10.1177/07419325070280030301
81.
YinR. K. (2012). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
82.
YinR. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
83.
ZimmermanB. J.ClearyT. J. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. In PajaresF.UrdanT. (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 45–70). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
