This article describes outcomes from a subpopulation of a larger study (The Alumni Study) of early college entrance alumni through the lens of self-determination theory. The Alumni Study used mixed methods, was implemented in two sequential phases, and included alumni from two different early college entrance programs (Early Entrance Program and UW Academy). The focus of this article is on the qualitative interviews of 26 UW Academy early entrants who fully matriculated into college as Honors Students after 10th grade. Results indicated that early college entrance (a) provided a more challenging and autonomous environment than high school, (b) provided higher personal control over academic and social choices, and (c) met students’ strong need for relatedness as well as for autonomy and competence. The early entrance to college program gave students a cohort where they could interact with same-age peers who had demonstrated similar academic competence and interests to achieve. However, some participants reported that being younger than their college peers may have inhibited the development of relationships with older college students.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development for the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.
2.
AssoulineS. G.ColangeloN.VanTassel-BaskaJ.Lupkowski-ShoplikA. (2015). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses holding back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
3.
BaardP. P.DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: A motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2045–2068.
4.
BoazmanJ.SaylerM. (2011). Personal well-being of gifted students following participation in an early college-entrance program. Roeper Review, 33, 76–85.
5.
BornsteinM.DavidsonL.KeyesC. L. M.MooreK. (Eds.). (2003). Well-being: Positive development throughout the life course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
BowmanN. A. (2010). The development of psychological well-being among first year college students. Journal of College Student Development, 51, 180–200.
7.
BrodyL. E.MuratoriM. C.StanleyJ. C. (2004). Early entrance to college: Academic, social, and emotional considerations. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 97–107). Iowa City: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
8.
BrodyL. E.StanleyJ. C. (1991). Young college students: Assessing factors that contribute to success. In SouthernW. T.JonesE. D. (Eds.), The academic acceleration of gifted children (pp. 102–132). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
9.
BuhlH. M. (2008). Development of a model describing individuated adult child–parent relationships. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 381–389.
10.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41–56.
11.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
12.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L.GutmannM. L.HansonW. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
DaiD. Y.Steenbergen-HuS. (2015). Special class for the gifted young: A 34-year experimentation with early college entrance programs in China. Roeper Review, 37, 9–18.
14.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
15.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuit: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.
17.
DeciE. L.VallerandR. J.PelletierL. G.RyanR. M. (1991). Motivation in education: The self-determination perspective. The Educational Psychologist, 26, 352–346.
18.
DubasJ. S.PetersenA. C. (1996). Geographical distance from parents and adjustment during adolescence and young adulthood. In GraberJ. A.DubasJ. S. (Eds.), Leaving home: Understanding the transition to adulthood; New directions for child development (pp. 3–20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19.
EcclesJ.MidgleyC.BuchananC. M.WigfieldA.ReumanD.FlanaganC.IverD. M. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.
20.
FieldS.HoffmanA.PoschM. (1997). Self-determination during adolescence: A developmental perspective. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 285–293.
21.
GagnéF.GagnierN. (2004). The socio-affective and academic impact of early entrance to school. Roeper Review, 26, 128–139.
22.
GalambosN. L.BarkerE. T.Tilton-WeaverL. C. (2003). Who gets caught at maturity gap? A study of pseudomature, immature, and mature adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27, 253–263.
23.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. London, England: Wiedenfeld & Nicholson.
24.
GrossM. U. M. (2004). Radical acceleration. In ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (Eds.), A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students (Vol. 2, pp. 87–96). Iowa: The University of Iowa, The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development.
25.
HarterS.JacksonB. K. (1992). Trait vs. nontrait conceptualizations of intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation. Motivation and Emotion, 16, 209–230.
26.
HertzogN. B.ChungR. A. (2015). Outcomes for students on a fast track to college: Early college entrance programs at the University of Washington. Roeper Review, 37, 39–49.
27.
HoogeveenL.van HellJ.VerhoevenL. (2012). Social-emotional characteristics of gifted accelerated and non-accelerated students in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 585–605.
28.
HuiE. K. P.TsangS. K. M. (2012). Self-determination as a psychological and positive youth development construct. Scientific World Journal, 4, 1–7.
29.
IngugliaC.IngogliaS.LigaF.Lo CocoA.Lo CricchioM. G. (2015). Autonomy and relatedness in adolescence and emerging adulthood: Relationships with parental support and psychological distress. Journal of Adult Development, 22, 1–13.
30.
KenyonD. B.KoernerS. S. (2009). Examining emerging-adults’ and parents’ expectations about autonomy during the transition to college. Journal of Adolescent Research, 24, 293–320.
31.
LevesqueC.ZuehlkeN.StanekL.RyanR. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and U.S. university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 68–84.
32.
LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345.
MerriamS. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
MunR. U.HertzogN. B. (2018). The influence of parental and self-expectations on high-achieving Asian American women. Manuscript submitted for publication.
36.
NobleK. D.ArndtT.NicholsenT.SlettenT.ZamoraA. (1999). Different strokes: Perceptions of social and emotional development among early college entrants. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 77–84.
37.
NobleK. D.ChildersS. A. (2009). Swimming in deep waters: 20 years of research about early university entrance at the University of Washington. In ShavininaL. (Ed.), International handbook on giftedness (pp. 1345–1364). New York, NY: Springer Science.
38.
NobleK. D.DrummondJ. E. (1992). But what about the prom? Students’ perceptions of early college entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 106–111.
39.
NobleK. D.RobinsonN.GundersonS. (1993). All rivers lead to the sea: A follow-up study of gifted young adults. Roeper Review, 15, 124–130.
40.
NobleK. D.SmythR. K. (1995). Keeping their talents alive: Young women’s assessment of radical acceleration. Roeper Review, 18, 49–55.
41.
NobleK. D.VaughanR. C.ChanC.ChildersS.ChowB.FederowA.HughesS. (2007). Love and work: The legacy of early university entrance. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 152–166.
42.
Olszewski-KubiliusP. (2002). A summary of research regarding early entrance to college. Roeper Review, 24, 152–157.
43.
ParkG.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2013). When less is more: Effects of grade skipping on adult STEM accomplishments among mathematically precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 176–198.
44.
ReeveJ. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–205). Rochester, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
45.
RichardsonT.BenbowC. P. (1990). Long-term effects of acceleration on the social-emotional adjustment of mathematically precocious youths. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 464–470.
46.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
47.
SantrockJ. W. (2014). A topical approach to life-span development (8th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
48.
SaylerM. F. (2015). Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science: 25 years of early college STEM opportunities. Roeper Review, 36, 29–38.
49.
SaylerM. F.BoazmanJ.NatesanP.PeriathiruvadiS. (2015). Subjective well-being of gifted American college students: An examination of psychometric properties of the PWI-A. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 236–248.
50.
SheldonK. M.SchülerJ. (2011). Wanting, having, and needing: Integrating motivate disposition theory and self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1106–1123.
51.
Steenbergen-HuS.MoonS. M. (2011). The effects of acceleration on high-ability learners: A meta-analysis. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 39–53.
52.
TeddlieC.TashakkoriA. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral Sciences. In TashakkoriA.TeddlieC. (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 3–50). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
53.
Van PetegemS.BeyersW.VansteenkisteM.SoenensB. (2012). On the association between adolescent autonomy and psychosocial functioning: Examining decisional (in)dependence from a self-determination theory perspective. Developmental Psychology, 48, 76–88.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
