This study examined identification with school among middle school students and its relationship with academic crowd membership, a public expression of one’s academic orientation. Of the 127 Grade 6 to 8 students in the sample, 55 reported participation in a gifted program; 44% of these gifted students did not claim affiliation with the academic crowd. There was a positive correlation between identification with school and the importance placed on membership for students in the academic crowd, both gifted and nongifted. The California Bully Victimization Scale was used to determine that no group was more likely to have been victimized. Cluster analysis of crowd memberships indicated that gifted students not in the academic crowd had few other crowd memberships, suggesting that middle school may be an important time to encourage a willingness to be viewed by peers as academically oriented through promoting identification with school.
AdlerP. A.KlessS. J.AdlerP. (1992). Socialization to gender roles: Popularity among elementary school boys and girls. Sociology of Education, 65, 169–187.
2.
AltermattE. R.PomerantzE. M. (2005). The implications of having high-achieving versus low-achieving friends: A longitudinal analysis. Social Development, 14, 61–81.
3.
AndersenL.CrossT. L. (2014). Are students who have high ability in math more motivated in math and science?Roeper Review, 36, 221–234. doi:10.1080/02783193.2014.945221
4.
BarberB. L.EcclesJ. S.StoneM. R. (2001). Whatever happened to the Jock, the Brain, and the Princess? Young adult pathways linked to adolescent activity involvement and social identity. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 429–455.
5.
BarberC.WassonJ. W. (2015). A comparison of adolescents’ friendship networks by advanced coursework participation status. Gifted Child Quarterly, 59, 23–37.
6.
BerndtT. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 608–616.
7.
BerndtT. J.KeefeK. (1995). Friends’ influence on adolescents’ adjustment to school. Child Development, 66, 1312–1329.
8.
BishopJ. H.BishopM.BishopM.GelbwasserL.GreenS.PetersonE.. . . ZuckermanA. (2004). Why we harass nerds and freaks: A formal theory of student culture and norms. Journal of School Health, 74, 235–251.
9.
BrownB. B.BakkenJ. P.AmeringerS. W.MahonS. D. (2008). A comprehensive conceptualization of the peer influence process in adolescence. In PrinsteinM. J.DodgeK. A. (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 17–44). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
BrownB. B.ClasenD. R.EicherS. A. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 22, 521–530.
11.
BrownB. B.EicherS. A.PetrieS. (1986). The importance of peer group (“crowd”) affiliation in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 9, 73–96.
12.
BrownB. B.LohrM. J. (1987). Peer-group affiliation and adolescent self-esteem: An integration of ego-identity and symbolic-interaction theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 47–55. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.1.47
13.
BrownB. B.LohrM. J.TrujilloC. (1990). Multiple crowds and multiple life styles: Adolescents’ perceptions of peer-group stereotypes. In MuussR. E. (Ed.), Adolescent behavior and society: A book of readings (pp. 30–36). New York, NY: Random House.
14.
BrownB. B.MoryM. S.KinneyD. (1994). Casting adolescent crowds in a relational perspective: Caricature, channel and context. In MontemayorR.AdamsG. R.GulottaT. P. (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 123–167). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
BrownB. B.SteinbergL. (1990). Skirting the brain-nerd connection: Academic achievement and social acceptance. Education Digest, 15(4), 57–60.
16.
CairnsR. B.CairnsB. D. (1994). Lifelines and risks: Pathways of youth in our time. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17.
ClasenD. R.BrownB. B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peer pressure in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 14, 451–468.
18.
ColemanJ. S. (1961). The adolescent society. New York, NY: Free Press.
19.
ColemanL. J. (1985). Schooling the gifted. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (1988). Is being gifted a social handicap?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41–56.
21.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (2000). Social-emotional development and personal experience of giftedness. In MönksF.HellerK.SternbergR.SubotnikR. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 203–212). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
22.
CrossJ. R. (2012). Crowds. In LevesqueR. J. R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (pp. 573–580). New York, NY: Springer.
23.
CrossJ. R.FletcherK. L. (2009). The challenge of adolescent crowd research: Defining the crowd. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 747–764. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9307-6
24.
CrossJ. R.FletcherK. L. (2010). Associations of parental and peer characteristics with adolescents’ social dominance orientation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 694–706. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9585-7
25.
CrossT. L.ColemanL. J.StewartR. A. (1995). Psychosocial diversity of gifted adolescents: An exploration of the stigma of the giftedness paradigm. Roeper Review, 17, 181–185.
26.
CrossT. L.ColemanL.Terhaar-YonkersM. (1991). The social cognition of gifted adolescents in schools: Managing the stigma of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 44–55.
27.
CrossT. L.SwiatekM. A. (2009). Social coping among academically gifted adolescents in a residential setting: A longitudinal study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 25–33.
28.
CsikszentmihalyiM.LarsonR. (1984). Being adolescent. New York, NY: Basic Books.
EriksonE. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
31.
ExlineJ. J.LobelM. (1999). The perils of outperformance: Sensitivity about being the target of a threatening upward comparison. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 307–337.
32.
FarmerT. W.HollowellJ. H. (1994). Social networks in mainstream classrooms: Social affiliations and behavioral characteristics of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2, 143–155, 163.
33.
FelixE. D.SharkeyJ. D.GreenJ. G.FurlongM. J.TanigawaD. (2011). Getting precise and pragmatic about the assessment of bullying: The development of the California Bullying Victimization Scale. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 234–247.
34.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
35.
FinnJ. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.
36.
FinnJ. D.RockD. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234.
37.
FordhamS.OgbuJ. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting White.’”The Urban Review, 18, 176–206.
38.
FrancisB.SkeltonC.ReadB. (2010). The simultaneous production of educational achievement and popularity: How do some pupils accomplish it?British Educational Research Journal, 36, 317–340.
39.
FredricksJ. A.BlumenfeldP. C.ParisA. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
40.
GallagherJ. J. (2011). A response to Ambrose, VanTassel-Baska, Coleman, and Cross: A NASA approach to gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 559–568.
41.
GoddardR. D.SweetlandS. R.HoyW. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36, 683–702.
42.
GormanA. H.KimJ.SchimmelbuschA. (2002). The attributes adolescents associate with peer popularity and teacher preference. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 143–165.
43.
GrossM. U. M. (1989). The pursuit of excellence or the search for intimacy? The forced-choice dilemma of gifted youth. Roeper Review, 11, 189–194.
44.
HogeR. D.RenzulliJ. S. (1993). Exploring the link between giftedness and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 63, 449–465.
45.
HornS. S. (2003). Adolescents’ reasoning about exclusion from social groups. Developmental Psychology, 39, 71–84.
46.
JuvonenJ.GalvanA. (2008). Peer influence in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In PrinsteinM. J.DodgeK. A. (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 225–244). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
47.
JuvonenJ.MurdockT. B. (1995). Grade-level differences in the social value of effort: Implications for self-presentation tactics in early adolescence. Child Development, 66, 1705–1964. doi:10.2307/1131904
48.
KanevskyL.KeighleyT. (2003). To produce or not to produce? Understanding boredom and the honor in underachievement. Roeper Review, 26, 20–28.
49.
KieferS. M.RyanA. M. (2011). Students’ perceptions of characteristics associated with social success: Changes during early adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 218–226. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.05.002
50.
La GrecaA. M.PrinsteinM. J.FetterM. D. (2001). Adolescent peer crowd affiliation: Linkages with health-risk behaviors and close friendships. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 26, 131–143.
51.
LeetsL.Sunwolf. (2005). Adolescent rules for social exclusion: When is it fair to exclude someone else?Journal of Moral Education, 34, 343–362. doi:10.1080/03057240500211618
52.
MarshH. W.PluckerJ. A.StockingV. B. (2001). The Self-Description Questionnaire II and gifted students: Another look at Plucker, Taylor, Callahan, and Tomchin’s (1997) “Mirror, mirror on the wall.”Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 976–997.
53.
MarshH. W.YeungA. S. (1997). The causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 41–54.
54.
MeijsN.CillessenA. H. N.ScholteR. H. J.SegersE.SpijkermanR. (2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 62–72.
55.
MitchellR. M.KenslerL.Tschannen-MoranM. (2010, October). The role of trust and school safety in fostering identification with school. Paper presented at the University Council for Educational Administration Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA.
56.
NewcombA. F.BukowskiW. M.PatteeL. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99–128.
OysermanD. (2007). Social identity and self-regulation. In KruglanskiA.HigginsT. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 432–453). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
59.
PrinsteinM. J.La GrecaA. M. (2002). Peer crowd affiliation and internalizing distress in childhood and adolescence: A longitudinal follow-back study. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 325–351.
60.
RaynerS. G. (2001). Aspects of the self as learner: Perception, concept, and esteem. In RidingR. J.RaynerS. G. (Eds.), Self-perception (pp. 25–52). Westport, CT: Ablex.
61.
RigsbyL. C.McDillE. L. (1975). Value orientations of high school students. In StubH. R. (Ed.), The sociology of education: A sourcebook (pp. 53–75). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
62.
RobinsonN. (1996). Counseling agendas for gifted young people: A commentary. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 128–137.
63.
RogersK. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on education practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382–396.
64.
SchneiderB. H.CleggM. R.ByrneB. M.LedinghamJ. E.CrombieG. (1989). Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 48–56.
65.
Schroeder-DavisS. J. (1999). Brains, brawn, or beauty: Adolescent attitudes toward three superlatives. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 10, 134–147.
66.
ShinH.RyanA. M. (2014). Early adolescent friendships and academic adjustment: Examining selection and influence processes with longitudinal social network analysis. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2462–2472.
67.
SteinbergL.BrownB. B.DornbuschS. M. (1996). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
68.
SteinbergL.MonahanK. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1531–1543.
69.
StoneM. R.BrownB. B. (1999). Identity claims and projections: Descriptions of self and crowds in secondary school. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 84, 7–20.
70.
SussmanS.PokhrelP.AshmoreR. D.BrownB. B. (2007). Adolescent peer group identification and characteristics: A review of the literature. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 1602–1627.
71.
SwiatekM. A. (2001). Social coping among gifted high school students and its relationship to self-concept. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30, 19–39.
72.
TannenbaumA. J. (1962). Adolescent attitude toward academic brilliance. New York, NY: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University.
73.
UrbergK. A. (1992). Locus of peer influence: Social crowd and best friend. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21, 439–450. doi:10.1007/BF01537896
74.
VoelklK. E. (1996). Measuring students’ identification with school. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 760–770.
75.
VoelklK. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 294–318.
