This multiple case study aims to answer the main research question, “How well are exceptionally talented Finnish and Singaporean dance students supported by significant individuals at different phases of the students’ development?” The exceptionally talented students aged 16 to 22 were enrolled in their national dance institutions—the Finnish National Opera Ballet School and the Singapore Dance Theatre. Perspectives of social support were elicited from 13 participants—dance students (n = 4), teachers (n = 6), parents (n = 2), and one sibling. Data were documents, letters, interviews, and observation field notes collected over 2 years. The themes that emerged from the deductive and inductive analysis—being there, sharing, and knowing—illustrated the types of support from families, peers, and teachers that contributed to the students’ development. While making cross-cultural comparisons, reflections about mindset, self-efficacy, and pedagogical practices are also discussed. A conclusion offers educational implications and directions for future research.
AlbertS. W. (1996). Writing from life: Telling your soul’s story. New York, NY: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Putnam.
2.
Alfeld-LiroC.FredricksJ. A.HrudaL. Z.AllisonH. P.RyanM.EcclesJ. (1998, February). Nurturing teenagers’ talent: The role of parents, teachers, and coaches. Biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego, CA.
3.
AraújoL. S.CruzJ. F. A.AlmeidaL. S. (2009). Pathways of excellence in science and dance: Lessons learned from a Portuguese case study. In WilliamonA.PrettyS.BuckR. (Eds.), Proceedings of the international symposium on performance science 2009 (pp. 139–144). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Association Européenne des Conservatoires, Académies de Musique et Musikhochschulen.
4.
AraújoL. S.CruzJ. F. A.AlmeidaL. S. (2011). Inspirational teachers: Their role in the development of excellence in professional dancers. In WilliamonA.EdwardsD.BartelL. (Eds.), Proceedings of the international symposium on performance science 2011 (pp. 49–54). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Association Européenne des Conservatoires, Académies de Musique et Musikhochschulen.
5.
AujlaI. J.Nordin-BatesS.ReddingE. (2014). A qualitative investigation of commitment to dance: Findings from the UK centers for advanced training. Research in Dance Education, 15, 138–160. doi:10.1080/14647893.2013.825764
6.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
BarlingJ.MacEwenK. E.PrattL. I. (1988). Manipulating the type and source of social support: An experimental investigation. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 20, 140–153. doi:10.1037/h0079923
8.
BloomB. S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
9.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
CarmanC. A. (2013). Comparing apples and oranges: Fifteen years of definitions of giftedness in research. Journal of Advanced Academics, 24, 52–70. doi:10.1177/1932202X12472602
11.
CheoR.QuahE. (2005). Mothers, maids, and tutors: An empirical evaluation of their effect on children’s academic grades in Singapore. Education Economics, 13, 269–285. doi:10.1080/09645290500073746
12.
ChronisterJ. A.JohnsonE. K.BervenN. L. (2006). Measuring social support in rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 75–84. doi:10.1080/09638280500163695
13.
ChuaJ. (2014a). Dance talent development across the lifespan: A review of current research. Research in Dance Education, 15, 23–53. doi:10.1080/14647893.2013.825749
14.
ChuaJ. (2014b). Dance talent development: Case studies of successful dancers in Finland and Singapore. Roeper Review, 36, 249–263. doi:10.1080/02783193.2014.945220
15.
ClarkG. A.ZimmermanE. D. (1988). Views of self, family background, and school: Interviews with artistically talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 340–346. doi:10.1177/001698628803200402
16.
CoffeyA. (2014). Analyzing documents. In FlickU. (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 367–380). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446282243.n25
17.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
18.
CohenS.SymeS. (1985). Social support and health. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
CohenS.WillsT. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
20.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK.WhalenS. (1993). Talented adolescents: The roots of success and failures. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
CummingG. (2010). p values versus confidence intervals as warrants for conclusion that results will replicate. In ThompsonB.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.), Methodologies for conducting research in giftedness (pp. 53–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
23.
DaiD. Y.ChenF. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 151–168. doi:10.1177/0016986213490020
24.
DaiD. Y.SchaderR. M. (2002). Decisions regarding music training: Parental beliefs and values. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 135–144. doi:10.1177/001698620204600206
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2011). Part II: Paradigms and perspectives in contention. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 91–95). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
DunnS. E.PutallazM.SheppardB. H.LindstromR. (1987). Social support and adjustment in gifted adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 467–473. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.467
29.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.
30.
EmberC. R.EmberM. (2001). Cross-cultural research methods. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
31.
FelixC. A. (2004). Our dancing days: Developmental issues of gifted adults in the performing arts (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University). Retrieved from http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/hkul/2990864
ForbatL.HendersonJ. (2005). Theoretical and practical reflections on sharing transcripts with participants. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1114–1128. doi:10.1177/1049732305279065
34.
FredricksJ. A.AlfeldC.EcclesJ. (2010). Developing and fostering passion in academic and nonacademic domains. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54, 18–30. doi:10.1177/0016986209352683
35.
FredricksJ. A.Alfeld-LiroC.HrudaL. Z.EcclesJ. S.PatrickH.RyanA. M. (2002). A qualitative exploration of adolescents’ commitment to athletics and the arts. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17, 68–97. doi:10.1177/0743558402171004
36.
FreemanJ. (2000). Children’s talent in fine art and music—England. Roeper Review, 22, 98–101. doi:10.1080/02783190009554010
37.
Garces-BacsalR. M. (2013a). Finding flow in artistic skill and technique: Narratives of young artists-in-training in Singapore. In LumC. H. (Ed.), Contextualized practices in arts education: An international dialogue on Singapore (pp. 191–210). Singapore: Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-981-4560-55-9_18
38.
Garces-BacsalR. M. (2013b). Perceived family influences in talent development among artistically talented teenagers in Singapore. Roeper Review, 35, 7–17. doi:10.1080/02783193.2013.740598
39.
Garces-BacsalR. M.CohenL.TanL. S. (2011). Soul behind the skill, heart behind the technique: Experiences of flow among artistically talented students in Singapore. Gifted Child Quarterly, 55, 194–207. doi:10.1177/0016986211413574.
GrahamS. (2009). Giftedness in adolescence: African American gifted youth and their challenges from a motivational perspective. In HorowitzF. D.SubotnikR. F.MatthewD. J. (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the life span (pp. 109–129). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
GraneheimU. H.LundmanB. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures, and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105–112. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
45.
GreenspanD. A.SolomonB.GardnerH. (2004). The development of talent in different domains. In ShavininaL. V.FerrariM. (Eds.), Beyond knowledge: Extracognitive aspects of developing high ability (pp. 119–135). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
HanksP. (2000). The new Oxford thesaurus of English. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
47.
HarrisJ. (2002). The correspondence method as a data-gathering technique in qualitative enquiry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(4), 1–17.
48.
HoP. S.ChongS. N. (2010). The talent development of a musically gifted adolescent in Singapore. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 47–60. doi:10.1177/0255761409351350
49.
HoganB. E.LindenW.NajarianB. (2002). Social support interventions: Do they work?Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 381–440. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00102-7
50.
JarvinL.SubotnikR. F. (2010). Wisdom from conservatory faculty: Insights on success in classical music performance. Roeper Review, 32, 78–87. doi:10.1080/02783191003587868
51.
KaminS.RichardsH.CollinsD. (2007). Influences on the talent development process of non-classical musicians: Psychological, social, and environmental influences. Music Education Research, 9, 449–468. doi:10.1080/14613800701587860
52.
KokkoH. (Producer), & SalmiL. (Director). (2010). Baletti on kivaa [Ballet is fun] [DVD]. Helsinki, Finland: YLE TV1.
53.
LapadatJ. (2000). Problematizing transcription: Purpose, paradigm, and quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 203–219. doi:10.1080/13645570050083698
54.
LeeS.-Y. (2002). The effects of peers on the academic and creative talent development of a gifted adolescent male. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 14, 19–29. doi:10.4219/jsge-2002-387
55.
LeijenÄ.LamI.WildschutL.SimonsP. R. (2009). Difficulties teachers report about students’ reflection: Lessons learned from dance education. Teaching in Higher Education, 14, 315–326. doi:10.1080/13562510902898882
56.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London, England: Sage.
57.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 30, 73–84. doi:10.1002/ev.1427
58.
LittleT. D.CardN. A.PreacherK. J.McConnelE. (2009). Modeling longitudinal data from research on adolescence. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. D. (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology, Vol. 1: Individual bases of adolescent development (3rd ed., pp. 15–54). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
59.
LöytönenT. (2008). Emotions in the everyday life of a dance school: Articulating unspoken values. Dance Research Journal, 40(1), 17–30. doi:10.1353/drj.0.0002
60.
MacKinnonD. W. (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In NielsonG. (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIV international congress of applied psychology(Vol. 2, pp. 11–39). Oxford, UK: Munksgaard.
61.
MakkonenA. (2007). One past, many histories. Loitsu (1933) in the context of dance art in Finland (Doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey). Retrieved from http://www.wwwmakkonen.kotisivukone.com/
62.
MaleckiC. K.DemarayM. K. (2003). What type of support do they need? Investigating student adjustment as related to emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 231–252. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.3.231.22576
63.
MannC.StewartF. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London, England: Sage.
64.
MaracekJ. (2003). Dancing through minefields: Toward a qualitative stance in psychology. In CamicP. M.RhodesJ. E.YardleyL. (Eds.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (pp. 49–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
65.
MilesM. B. (1979). Qualitative data as an attractive nuisance: The problem of analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 590–601.
66.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 250–260. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
70.
NieminenP.VarstalaV.ManninenM. (2001). Goal orientation and perceived purposes of dance among Finnish dance students: A pilot study. Research in Dance Education, 2, 175–193. doi:10.1080/14647890120100791
71.
Olszewski-KubiliusP.GrantB.SeibertC. (1994). Social support systems and the disadvantaged gifted: A framework for developing programs and services. Roeper Review, 17, 20–25. doi:10.1080/02783199409553612
72.
OreckB.BaumS.McCartneyH. (2000). Artistic talent development for urban youth: The promise and the challenge (No. RM00144). University of Connecticut, Storrs: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
73.
PajaresF. (2012). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research and applications (pp. 111–139). New York, NY: Routledge.
74.
PatrickH.RyanA. M.Alfeld-LiroC.FredricksJ. A.HrudaL. Z.EcclesJ. S. (1999). Adolescents’ commitment to developing talent: The role of peers in continuing motivation for sports and the arts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 28, 741–763.
75.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
76.
PickardA.BaileyR. (2009). Crystallizing experiences among young elite dancers. Sport, Education and Society, 14, 165–181. doi:10.1080/13573320902809047
77.
PiirtoJ. (2007). Understanding visual artists. In TirriK. (Ed.), Values and foundations in gifted education (pp. 29–39). Bern, Germany: Peter Lang.
78.
RautioP. (2009). Finding the place of everyday beauty: Correspondence as a method of data collection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(2), 15–34.
79.
RisnerD. (2009). Stigma and perseverance in the lives of boys who dance: An empirical study of male identities in Western theatrical dance training. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
80.
RisnerD. (2014). Bullying victimization and social support of adolescent male dance students: An analysis of findings. Research in Dance Education, 15, 179–201. doi:10.1080/14647893.2014.891847
81.
RubinH. J.RubinI. (2004). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452226651
82.
SanchezE. N.AujlaI. J.Nordin-BatesS. (2013). Cultural background variables in dance talent development: Findings from the UK centers for advanced training. Research in Dance Education, 14, 260–278. doi:10.1080/14647893.2012.712510
83.
SemmerN. K.ElferingA.JacobshagenN.PerrotT.BeehrT. A.BoosN. (2008). The emotional meaning of instrumental social support. International Journal of Stress Management, 15, 235–251. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.15.3.235
SosniakL. A. (1985). Learning to be a concert pianist. In BloomB. S. (Ed.), Developing talent in young people (pp. 19–67). New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
86.
SosniakL. A. (1990). The tortoise, the hare, and the development of talent. In HoweM. J. A. (Ed.), Encouraging the development of exceptional skills and talents (pp. 149–164). Leicester, UK: British Psychological Society.
87.
StakeR. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 433–466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
88.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
89.
SternbergR. J.HorvathJ. A. (2002). Cognitive conceptions of expertise and their relations to giftedness. In FriedmanR. C.RogersK. B. (Eds.), Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 177–191). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
90.
SubotnikR. F.JarvinL. (2005). Beyond expertise: Conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343–357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
91.
SubotnikR. F.Olszewski-KubiliusP.WorrellF. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056
92.
SuhonenT. (1997). Kaunoliiketaiteesta tanssirealismiin: Suomalaisen tanssin historiaa [From calligraphy to dance realism: Finnish dance history]. In HelavuoriH.KekkonenJ.RaatikainenR.VuorenmaaT. (Eds.), Valokuvan tanssi. Suomalaisen tanssin kuvat 1890–1997 [Dance in Finnish photography] (pp. 248–249). Oulu, Finland: Pohjoinen.
93.
TardyC. H. (1994). Counteracting task-induced stress: Studies of instrumental and emotional support in problem-solving contexts. In BurlesonB. R.AlbrechtT. L.SarasonI. G. (Eds.), Communication of social support: Messages, interactions, relationships, and community (pp. 71–87). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
94.
VandenBosG. R. (2013). APA dictionary of lifespan developmental psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
95.
VangelistiA. L. (2009). Challenges in conceptualizing social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 39–51. doi:10.1177/0265407509105520
96.
van RossumJ. H. A. (2001). Talented in dance: The Bloom stage model revisited in the personal histories of dance students. High Ability Studies, 12, 181–197. doi:10.1080/13598130120084320
97.
van RossumJ. H. A. (2004). The dance teacher: The ideal case and daily reality. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 36–55. doi:10.1177/016235320402800103
98.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2013). The world of cross-cultural research: Insights for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 36, 6–18. doi:10.1177/0162353212471451
99.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.Olszewski-KubiliusP.KuliekeM. (1994). A study of self-concept and social support in advantaged and disadvantaged seventh and eighth graders. Roeper Review, 16, 186–191. doi:10.1080/02783199409553570
100.
VialleW.HeavenP. C. L.CiarrochiJ. (2007). On being gifted, but sad and misunderstood: Social, emotional, and academic outcomes of gifted students in the Wollongong youth study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 569–586. doi:10.1080/13803610701786046
101.
WeisnerT. S. (2010). John and Beatrice Whiting’s contributions to the cross-cultural study of human development: Their values, goals, norms, and practices. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41, 499–509. doi:10.1177/0022022110362720
102.
WilliamsD. A. (2003). Examining psychosocial issues of adolescent male dancers (Doctoral dissertation, Marywood University). Retrieved from http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/hkul/2990804
103.
WilliamsP.BarclayL.SchmiedV. (2004). Defining social support in context: A necessary step in improving research, intervention, and practice. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 942–960. doi:10.1177/1049732304266997
104.
WilligC. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (2nd ed.). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
105.
WinemillerD. R.MitchellM. E.SutliffJ.ClineD. J. (1993). Measurement strategies in social support: A descriptive review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 638–648. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199309)49:53.0.CO;2-7
106.
WyllemanP.LavalleeD. (2004). A developmental perspective on transitions faced by athletes. In WeissM. (Ed.), Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective (pp. 507–529). Morgantown, WV: FIT.
107.
YinR. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
