AmbroseD.VanTassel-BaskaJ.ColemanL.CrossT. (2010). Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 33, 453–476.
2.
America COMPETES Act of 2007, Pub. L. No. 110–69, 121 Stat. 572–718 (2007).
3.
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111–5 (2009).
4.
CallahanC. M. (2004). Introduction to program evaluation in gifted education. In CallahanC. M. (Ed.), Program evaluation in gifted education (pp. xxiii–xxxi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
5.
Center for Gifted Education. (1998). Persuasion: A language arts unit for high ability learners: Grades 5–7. Williamsburg, VA: The College of William & Mary.
6.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS.GrossM. U. M. (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City: The Connie Belin & Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development,The University of Iowa.
7.
Committee on Prospering in the Global Economy of the 21st Century. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
8.
Congressional Research Service. (2008). Congressional Research Services Report. Washington DCDec.19, 2008. The Federal Budget. Current and Upcoming Issues.
9.
Education for all Handicapped Children Act of 1975, Pub. L. 94–142, 89 Stat. 773 (1975).
10.
FinegoldK.WheryL.SchardinS. (2004). Block grants: Historical overview and lessons learned. Urban Institute Research of Record, Report No. A-63. Retrieved November26, 2010 from http://www.urban.org/publications/310991.html
11.
FordD. (2003). Equity and excellence: Culturally diverse students in gifted education. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted Education (3rd ed., pp. 506–520). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
12.
FullanM. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. (3rd ed.) New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
GallagherJ. (1975). How the government breaks its promises. New York University Quarterly, 6(4), 22–27.
14.
GallagherJ. (2002). Society’s role in educating gifted students: The role of public policy. (Research Monograph 02162). Storrs: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
15.
GallagherJ. J. (2006). Driving change in special education. Baltimore; Paul H. Brookes.
16.
GardnerJ. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC. U.S. Government Printing Office.
17.
GoodladJ. (1964). School curricular reform in the United States. New York: The Fund for the Advancement of Education.
18.
Government Accountability Office. (2010, January). Federal education funding: Overview of K–12 and early childhood education programs. Retrieved June 2011 from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/dl051.pdf
19.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997. Pub. L. No. 105 Persuasion: A language arts unit for high ability learners: Grades 17, §101, 111, Stat. 37 (1997).
20.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, H.R. 1 350, 108th Cong. (2003–2004).
21.
Jacob, K. Javits Gifted and Talented Students Education Act of 1988, Pub. L. No. 100 Persuasion: A language arts unit for high ability learners: Grades 297, §1001, 102, Stat. 237 (1988).
22.
JeffersonT. (1905). The Works, Vol. 3 (Notes on Virginia I, Correspondence 1780–1782) (Federal ed.). New York & London, UK: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
23.
KolloffP. (2003). State supported residential high schools. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 238–246). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
MarlandS. P.Jr. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Vol. 1, Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Commissioner of Education. (Government Documents, Y4.L 11/2: G36). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
25.
ReisS. M.WestbergK. L.KulikowichJ. M.PurcellJ. H. (1998). Curriculum compacting and achievement test scores: What does the research say?Gifted Child Quarterly, 42,123–129.
26.
RenzulliJ. S. (2003). Conceptions of giftedness and its relationship to the development of social capital. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 75–87). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27.
RenzulliJ. S.ReisS. N. (1985). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
28.
StanleyJ. (1997). In the beginning: The study of mathematically precocious youth. In BenbowC.LubinskiD. (Eds.), Intellectual talent; Psychometric and social issues. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
TannenbaumA. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In ColangeloN.DavisG. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45–59). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
30.
TomlinsonC. A.KaplanS. N.RenzulliJ. S.PurcellJ. H.LeppienJ. H.BurnsD. E. et al. (2009). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop learning potential and challenge advanced learning (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
31.
ToynbeeA. (1964). Is America neglecting her creative talents? In TaylorC. W. (Ed.), Widening horizons and creativity (pp. 3–9). New York: Wiley.
32.
U.S. Department of Education. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talents. Washington, DC: Author.
33.
ZiglerE.StyfcoS. (2004). The Head Start debates. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.