The Cognitive Map of a Master Teacher Conducting Discussions With Gifted Students

Abstract

Teachers have many methods available to them for instructing students. This article presents a teacher’s perspective on conducting a discussion with a group of children who were gifted and talented. I studied one teacher using participant observation and ethnographic interviewing as he taught in a special program. I used the concept of professional practical knowledge to describe the information and skills acquired through past experience that characterized his teaching. Eight patterns of thought and behavior were central to how he conducted discussions. I organized these patterns and their subroutines into a cognitive map to represent his teaching. I discuss the cognitive map and the implications of this study for future research and for the preparation of teachers of children who are gifted.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alpert

B.R.

(1987). Active, silent and controlled discussions: Explaining variations in classroom conversation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3, 29–40.

Clark

(1988). Growing up gifted (3rd ed.) Columbus: Merrill.

Clark

C.M.

(1988). Asking the right questions about teacher preparation contributions of research on teacher thinking. Educational Researcher, 17, 5–11.

Coleman

L.J.

(1985). Schooling the gifted. Palo Alto: Addison-Wesley.

Coleman

L.J.

(1991). The invisible world of professional practical knowledge of a teacher of the gifted. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 14, 151–165.

Doyle

(1986). Classroom organization and management. In Wittorck

M.C.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on leaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.

Erickson

(1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Wittrock

M. C.

(Ed.) Handbook of research on teaching, (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

Gall

(1976). The discussion method. In Gage

N. L.

(Ed.), The psychology of teaching methods (pp. 166–216). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Gallagher

J.J.

(1985). Teaching the gifted (3rd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

10.

Giorgio

(1985). Phenomenology and psychological research. Atlantic Highlands, N J: Humanities Press.

11.

Goetz

LeCompte

(1984). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

12.

Livingston

Borko

(1989). Expert–novice differences in teaching: A cognitive analysis and implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(4), 36–42.

13.

Michell

Lambourne

R.D.

(1979). An association between high intellectual ability and an imaginative and analytic approach to the discussion of open questions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 60–72.

14.

Shulman

(1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

15.

Spradley

J.P.

(1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rcinehart & Winston.

16.

Stewart

(1981). Learning style among gifted/talented students—instructional technique preferences. Exceptional Children, 48, 134–138.