The study explored the relationship between types of spatial experiences and spatial abilities among 13- to 14-year-old high academic achievers. Each participant completed two spatial tasks and a survey assessing favored spatial activities across five categories (computers, toys, sports, music, and art) and three developmental periods (early childhood, middle childhood, and adolescence). The first phase of analysis determined the percentage of favorite activities by category and developmental period; the second phase examined how participants with the highest scores on each spatial measure differed in their experiences. Findings showed that certain activities (e.g., playing video games and soccer) tended to reemerge across periods and be linked to strong spatial skills. Implications for nurturing high achievers’ potential to succeed in spatially demanding careers are discussed.
ArmstrongJ. A. (2003, summer). The foreign student dilemma. Issues in Science and Technology, 19, 22-23.
2.
AshbyC. M. (2006). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics trends and the role of federal programs (Report No. GAO-06-702T). Washington, DC: United States Government Accountability Office.
3.
BaenningerM.NewcombeN. (1989). The role of experience in spatial task performance: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327-344.
4.
BaenningerM.NewcombeN. (1995). Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial ability and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 363-379.
5.
BenbowC. P.MinorL. L. (1990). Cognitive profiles of verbally and mathematically precocious students: Implications for identification of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 21-26.
6.
BharuchaJ. (2008). America can teach Asia a lot about science, technology, and math. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(20), p. A33. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EJ786384)
7.
CaseyB. M.AndrewsN.SchindlerH.KershJ. E.SamperA.CopleyJ. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building. Cognition and Instruction, 26, 269-309.
8.
ChanD. W. (2007). Gender differences in spatial ability: Relationship to spatial experience among Chinese gifted students in Hong Kong. Roeper Review, 29, 277-282.
9.
CherneyI. D. (2008). Mom, let me play more computer games: They improve my mental rotation skills. Sex Roles, 59, 76-778.
10.
Costa-GiomiE. (1999). The effects of three years of piano instruction on children’s cognitive development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47, 198-212.
11.
EliotJ.CzarnolewskiM. Y. (2007). Development of an everyday spatial behavioral questionnaire. Journal of General Psychology, 134, 361-381.
12.
GinnS. R.PickensS. J. (2005). Relationships between spatial activities and scores on the mental rotation test as a function of sex. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 877-881.
13.
GreenfieldP.BrannonC.LohrD. (1994). Two-dimensional representation of movement through three-dimensional space: The role of video game expertise. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 15, 87-103.
14.
HermelinB.O’ConnorN. (1986). Spatial representations in mathematically and artistically gifted children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 150-157.
15.
HughesB. (2009). How to start a STEM team. Technology Teacher, 69(2), 27-29.
16.
HultR. E.Jr.BrousC. W. (1986). Spatial visualization: Athletic skills and sex differences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 163-168.
17.
MannR. L. (2005). Gifted students with spatial strengths and sequential weaknesses: An overlooked and underidentified population. Roeper Review, 27, 91-96.
18.
National Science Board. (2009). A national action plan for addressing the critical needs of the U.S. science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education system. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/stem/index.jsp
19.
NewcombeN.BanduraM. M.TaylorD. G. (1983). Sex differences in spatial ability and spatial activities. Sex Roles, 9, 377-386.
20.
OzelS.LarueJ.MolinaroC. (2004). Relation between sport and spatial imagery: Comparison of three groups of participants. Journal of Psychology, 138, 49-63.
21.
RauscherF. H. (1999). Music exposure and the development of spatial intelligence in children. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 142, 35-47.
22.
ReichelH. (1997). Identifying and promoting mathematically gifted pupils and students (12-20 years). High Ability Studies, 8, 223-232.
23.
RohdeT. E.ThompsonL. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35, 83-92.
24.
SerbinL. A.ConnorJ. M. (1979). Sex-typing of children’s play preferences and patterns of cognitive performance. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 134, 315-316.
25.
SheaD. L.LubinskiD.BenbowC. (2001). Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 604-614.
SignorellaM. L.KrupaM. H.JamisonW.LyonsN. (1986). A short version of a spatial activity questionnaire. Sex Roles, 14, 475-479.
28.
StumpfH. (1994). Subskills of spatial ability and their relationships to success in accelerated mathematics courses. In HellerK. A.HanyE. A. (Eds.), Competence and responsibility: The Third European Conference of the European Council for High Ability (pp. 286 -297). Hogrefe and Huber, Seattle, WA.
29.
StumpfH.EliotJ. (1995). Gender-related differences in spatial ability and the k factor of general spatial ability in a population of academically talented students. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 33-45.
30.
TerleckiM. S.NewcombeN. S. (2005). How important is the digital divide? The relation of computer and videogame usage to gender differences in mental rotation ability. Sex Roles, 53, 433-441.
31.
VandenbergS. G.KuseA. R. (1978). Mental rotations: A group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
32.
van GarderenD.MontagueM. (2003). Visual-spatial representation, mathematical problem solving and students of varying abilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 246-254.
33.
VoyerD.NolanC.VoyerS. (2000). The relation between experience and spatial performance in men and women. Sex Roles, 43, 891-915.
34.
WebbR. M.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P. (2007). Spatial ability: A neglected dimension in talent searches for intellectually precocious youth. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 397-420.
