Much like medieval, feudal nations, professional fields such as gifted education can take shape as centralized kingdoms with strong armies controlling their compliant populations and protecting closed borders, or as loose collections of conflict-prone principalities with borders open to invaders. Using an investigative framework borrowed from an interdisciplinary group of scholars in the social sciences and humanities, four scholars of gifted education analyzed four different analytic levels of our field (practice, research, theory, philosophy) to discern whether gifted education is unified, insular, and firmly policed, or fractured, conflict-ridden, and porous. Each disciplinary structure generates unique advantages, disadvantages, and implications for scholars and practitioners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbramsM. W. (1997) The transformation of English studies: 1930–1995 In BenderT.SchorskeC. E. (Eds.), American academic culture in transformation: Fifty years, four disciplines (pp. 123–149). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
2.
AkeroydF. M. (1990) An oscillatory model of the growth of scientific knowledgeBritish Journal of the Philosophy of Science, 41, 407–414
3.
AmbroseD. (1998a) Comprehensiveness of conceptual foundations for gifted education: A world-view analysisJournal for the Education of the Gifted, 21, 452–470
4.
AmbroseD. (1998b) A model for clarification and expansion of conceptual foundationsGifted Child Quarterly, 42, 77–86
5.
AmbroseD. (2003) Paradigms, mind shifts, and the 21st-century Zeitgeist: New contexts for creative intelligence In AmbroseD.CohenL. M.TannenbaumA. J. (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 11–31). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
6.
AmbroseD. (2006) Large-scale contextual influences on creativity: Evolving academic disciplines and global value systemsCreativity Research Journal, 18, 75–85
AmbroseD.CohenL. M.TannenbaumA. J. (2003) Mapping the terrain In AmbroseD.CohenL. M.TannenbaumA. J. (Eds.), Creative intelligence: Toward theoretic integration (pp. 3–10). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
9.
BeckertJ. (2002) Beyond the market: The social foundations of economic efficiency.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
10.
BenderT.SchorskeC. E. (Eds.). (1997) American academic culture in transformation: Fifty years, four disciplines.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
11.
BorlandJ. H. (1990) Post-positivist inquiry: Implications of the new philosophy of science for the field of the education of the giftedGifted Child Quarterly, 34, 161–167
12.
BorlandJ. (Ed.). (2003) Rethinking gifted education.New York, NY: Teachers College Press
13.
BormanG. D.SlavinR. E.CheungA. C. K.ChamberlainA. M.MaddenN. A.ChambersB. (2007) Final reading outcomes of the national randomized field trial of Success for AllAmerican Educational Research Journal, 44, 701–731
14.
ChauvinJ. C. (2000) Spirituality, psychotherapy, and the gifted individualAdvanced Development, 9, 123–135
15.
ColangeloN.AssoulineS. G.GrossM. U. M. (2004) A nation deceived: How schools hold back America's brightest students (Vol. 1). Iowa City: University of Iowa, The Connie Belin and Jacqueline N. Blank International Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development
16.
ColemanL. J. (2003) An essay on rethinking theory as a tool for disciplined inquiry In BorlandJ. H. (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 61–71). New York, NY: Teachers College Press
17.
ColemanL. J. (2005) Nurturing talent in high school: Life in the fast lane.New York, NY: Teachers' College Press
18.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (1988) Is being gifted a social handicap?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11, 41–56
19.
ColemanL. J.CrossT. L. (2005) Being gifted in school(2nd ed.).Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
20.
ColemanL. J.SandersM. D.CrossT. L. (1997) Perennial debates and tacit assumptions in the education of gifted childrenGifted Child Quarterly, 41, 103–111
21.
CrossT. L. (2006) The social and emotional lives of gifted kids: Understanding and guiding their development(3rd ed.).Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
22.
DiamondJ. (1997) Guns, germs, and steel: The fates of human societies.New York, NY: Random House
23.
GagnéF. (2003) Transforming gifts into talents: The DMGT as a developmental theory In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 60–74). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
24.
GallagherJ. J. (2006) How to shoot oneself in the foot with program evaluationRoeper Review, 28, 122–124
25.
GeertzC. (2000) Available light: Anthropological reflections on philosophical topics.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
26.
GrantB. A.PiechowskiM. M. (1999) Theories and the good: Toward child-centered gifted educationGifted Child Quarterly, 43, 4–12
27.
KerrB.McAlisterJ. (2000) Shamanic journey: An apprenticeship in spiritual intelligenceAdvanced Development, 9, 45–55
28.
KrepsD. M. (1997) Economics, the current position In BenderT.SchorskeC. E. (Eds.), American academic culture in transformation: Fifty years, four disciplines (pp. 77–103). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
29.
KuhnT. S. (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions(2nd ed.).Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press
30.
LoveckyD. V. (1998) Spiritual sensitivity in gifted childrenRoeper Review, 20, 178–183
31.
MarxM. (1963) The general nature of theory construction In MarxM. (Ed.), Theory in contemporary psychology (pp. 4–43). New York, NY: Macmillan
32.
MonroeK. (2003) How identity and perspective constrain moral choiceInternational Political Science Review, 24, 405–425
33.
OvertonW. F. (1984) World views and their influence on psychological thoughts and research: Khun-Lakatos-Laudan In ReeseH. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 91–226). New York, NY: Academic Press
34.
PepperS. C. (1942) World hypotheses.Berkeley: University of California Press
35.
PiechowskiM. M. (2000) Childhood experiences and spiritual giftednessAdvanced Development, 9, 65–90
36.
PiechowskiM. M. (2003) Emotional and spiritual giftedness In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), The handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 403–416). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
37.
RenzulliJ.ReisS. (1985) The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence.Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press
38.
ReynoldsF. C.PiirtoJ. (2005) Depth psychology and giftedness: Bringing soul to the field of talent development and giftednessRoeper Review, 27, 164–171
39.
RobinsonA.ShoreB.EnersenD. (2007) Best practices in gifted education: An evidence-based guide.Waco, TX: Prufrock Press
40.
RogersK. B. (2002) Re-forming gifted education: Matching the program to the child.Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press
41.
SchultzR. A. (2002) Understanding giftedness and underachievement: At the edge of possibilityGifted Child Quarterly, 46, 193–208
SternbergR. J.DavidsonJ. E. (Eds.). (2005) Conceptions of giftedness.New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
44.
SubotnikR. F. (2006) A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted educationGifted Child Quarterly, 50, 354–355
45.
TorranceE. P. (1995) Why fly? A philosophy of creativity.Norwood, NJ: Ablex
46.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (1998) Appropriate curriculum for the talented learner In Van Tassel-BaskaJ. (Ed.), Excellence in educating gifted and talented learners (3rd ed., pp. 339–361). Denver, CO: Love
47.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (2006) Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners(3rd ed.).Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon
