A longitudinal study of student growth gains was conducted in Title I schools to assess growth in reading comprehension and critical thinking. Results suggested that all students benefited from the intervention of Project Athena units of study designed for high-ability learners. In addition, the study suggested that the comparison curriculum also benefited learners. Implications for practice include the use of high-level curriculum with all learners to elevate instruction and enhance critical thinking. Implications for scholarship include the need for studies that examine the specific nature of gains for different types of learners and schools using hierarchical linear modeling techniques.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlvermannD. (2002). Effective literacy instruction for adolescents. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 189–209
2.
AlvermannD. E.UmplebyR.OlsonJ. R. (1996). Getting involved and having fun: Dilemmas in building a literate community in one lower-track English class. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 461–475
3.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A. (2006). The state of writing instruction in America's schools: What existing data tell us. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement
4.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ. A.MullisI. V. S.LathamA. S.GentileC. A. (1994). NAEP 1992 writing report card. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement
5.
ApplebeeA. N.LangerJ.NystrandM.GamoranA. (2003). Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 685–730
BaumannJ. F.IveyG. (1997). Delicate balances: Striving for curricular and instructional equilibrium in a second-grade, literature/strategy-based classroom. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 244–275
8.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (1999). Comprehension: The sine qua non of reading. Teaching and Change, 6, 197–211
9.
BottomleyD. M.TruscottD. M.MarinakB. A.HenkW. A.MelnickS. A. (1999). An affective comparison of whole language, literature-based and basal reader literacy instruction. Reading Research and Instruction, 29, 115–129
10.
BrackenB. A. (1993). Multidimensional Self-Concept Scale. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed
11.
BrackenB. A. (1996). Clinical applications of a multidimensional, context-dependent model of self-concept. In BrackenB. A. (Ed.), Handbook of self concept: Developmental, social, and clinical considerations (pp. 463–505). New York: John Wiley and Sons
12.
BrackenB. A.BaiW.FithianE.LamprechtM. S.LittleC.QuekC. (2003). The Test of Critical Thinking. Williamsburg, VA: Center for Gifted Education, The College of William and Mary
ChandlerK. (2004). A national study of curriculum policy and practice for gifted students in the fifty states. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA
15.
CoburnC. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher, 32 (6), 3–12
DahlK. L.ScharerP. L.LawsonL. L.GroganP. R. (1999). Phonics instruction and student achievement in whole language first-grade classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 312–341
18.
DesimoneL. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented?Review of Educational Research, 72, 433–479
19.
FengA. X.VanTassel-BaskaJ.QuekC.BaiW.O'NeillB. (2005). A longitudinal assessment of gifted students' learning using the Integrated Curriculum Model (ICM): Impacts and perceptions of the William and Mary language arts and science curriculum. Roeper Review, 27, 78–83
20.
FieldingL. G.PearsonP. D. (1994). Reading comprehension: What works. Educational Leadership, 51 (5), 62–67
21.
FitzgeraldJ.NoblitG. (2000). Balance in the making: Learning to read in an ethnically diverse first-grade classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 3–22
22.
GardnerH. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic Books
23.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.WilliamsJ. P.BakerS. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320
24.
HenryA.RoseberryR. L. (1996). A corpus-based investigation of the language and linguistic patterns of one genre and the implications for language teaching. Research in the Teaching of English, 30, 427–489
25.
HillocksG.Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and National Conference on Research in English
26.
HooverH. D.DunbarS. B.FrisbieD. A. (2001). Iowa Tests of Basic Skills. Itasca, IL: Riverside
27.
JensenA. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger
28.
JewellT. A.PrattD. (1999). Literature discussions in the primary grades: Children's thoughtful discourse about books and what teachers can do to make it happen. The Reading Teacher, 52, 842–850
29.
KaplanD. (Ed). (2004). The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
30.
KnappM. S.AdelmanN. E.MarderC.McCollumH.NeedelsM. C.PadillaC. (1995). Teaching for meaning in high-poverty classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press
31.
LangerJ. A. (1994). A response-based approach to reading literature: Report Series No. 6.7. Albany, NY: National Research Center on Literature Teaching and Language
32.
LangerJ. A. (2000). Guidelines for teaching middle and high school students to read and write well: Six features of effective instruction. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement
33.
LangerJ. (2001). Beating the odds: Teaching middle and high school students to read and write well. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 837–880
34.
LevyC. M.RansdellS. (Eds.). (1996). The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
35.
LohmanD.HagenE. P. (2001). Cognitive Abilities Test norms booklet. Itasca, IL: Riverside
36.
MorrowL.PressleyM.SmithJ.SmithM. (1997). The effect of a literature-based program integrated into literacy and science instruction with children from diverse backgrounds. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 54–78
37.
National Assessment Governing Board. (2009). Reading framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
38.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
39.
NewellG. E. (1996). Reader-based and teacher-centered instructional tasks: Writing and learning about a short story in middle-track classrooms. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 147–172
40.
PaulR. (1992). Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. Sonoma, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking
41.
RosenblattL. M. (1982). The literary transaction: Evocation and response. Theory Into Practice, 21, 268–277
42.
SadoskiM.WillsonV. L.NortonD. E. (1997). The relative contributions of research-based composition activities to writing improvement in the lower and middle grades. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 120–147
43.
SchoenfeldA. (2006). What doesn't work: The challenge of the WWC to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula. Education Researcher, 35 (2), 13–21
44.
SchorzmanE.CheekE. (2004). Structured strategy instruction: Investigating an intervention for improving sixth-graders' reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 25 (1), 37–60
45.
StevensR. (2003). Student team reading and writing: A cooperative learning approach to middle school literacy instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 137–160
46.
SnowC. E.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
47.
TaylorB. M.PearsonP. D.PetersonD. S.RodriguezM. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104 (1), 3–30
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1988). Developing scope and sequence in curriculum: A comprehensive approach. Gifted Child Today, 11 (3), 29–34
50.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (1998). Excellence in educating gifted and talented learners(3rd ed.).Denver, CO: Love
51.
VanTassel-BaskaJ. (2003). Curriculum planning and instructional design for gifted learners. Denver, CO: Love
52.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.AveryL. D.LittleC. A.HughesC. E. (2000). An evaluation of the implementation: The impact of the William and Mary units on schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 23, 244–272
53.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.AveryL.StruckJ.FengA. X.BrackenB.DrummondD. (2003). Classroom Observation Scale-Revised. Williamsburg, VA: Center for Gifted Education, The College of William and Mary
54.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.BassG.RiesR.PolandD.AveryL. (1998). A national pilot study of science curriculum effectiveness for high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200–211
55.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.BrackenB.BrownE.FengA. (2005). Project Athena year three student data report. Williamsburg, VA: Center for Gifted Education, The College of William and Mary
56.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.BrackenB.FengA.BrownE. (in press). A longitudinal study of reading comprehension and reasoning ability of students in elementary Title I schools. Journal for the Education of the Gifted
57.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.FengA.BrownE.BaytopsJ.HenshonS.BaiW. (2002). An evaluation study of the Greenville, South Carolina challenge program. Williamsburg, VA: Center for Gifted Education, The College of William and Mary
58.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.JohnsonD. T.HughesC. E.BoyceL. N. (1996). A study of the language arts curriculum effectiveness with gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 461–480
59.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.QuekC.FengA. X. (2007). Developing structured observation scales for instructional improvement in classrooms accommodating gifted learners. Roeper Review, 29, 84–92
60.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.StambaughT. (2006). Project Athena: A pathway to advanced literacy development for children of poverty. Gifted Child Today, 29 (2), 58–63
61.
VanTassel-BaskaJ.ZuoL.AveryL. D.LittleC. A. (2002). A curriculum study of gifted student learning in the language arts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 30–44
62.
VillaumeS. K.BrabhamE. G. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Beyond strategies. The Reading Teacher, 55, 672–676
63.
WassermanJ. D.BrackenB. A. (2003). Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures. In GrahamJ. R.NaglieriJ. A.WeinerI. B. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Volume 10: Assessment psychology (pp. 43–66). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons
