Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss the implications for gifted students of challenges facing rural schools. We explore 4 challenges with particular relevance to rural schools: (a) declining population, (b) persistent poverty, (c) changing demographics, and (d) ongoing accountability requirements. Recommendations positioned to address these challenges include providing special instruction using distance education, making use of broad definitions of giftedness, making use of various acceleration strategies, and encouraging talented students to plan for meaningful careers in their home communities.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

C. M.

Cross

T. L.

(1999–2000). Distance learning opportunities for academically gifted students. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 11, 88–96

Artz

(2003). Rural area brain drain: Is it a reality? Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm & Resource Issues, 18 (4), 11–16

Baldwin

A. Y.

(2004). Introduction to culturally diverse and underserved populations of gifted students. In Baldwin

A. Y.

(Ed.), Culturally diverse and underserved populations of gifted students (pp. xxiii–xxxi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Barbour

Mulcahy

(2006). An inquiry into retention and achievement differences in campus based and web based AP courses. Rural Educator, 27 (3), 8–12

Battelle for Kids. (2006). Frequently asked questions about value-added analysis and the gifted community. Retrieved July 6, 2008, from http://ohiorc.org/orc_documents/orc/value-added/documents/Gifted_FAQs.pdf

Booher-Jennings

(2006). Rationing education in an era of accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 756–761

Briggs

C. J.

Reis

S. M.

Sullivan

E. E.

(2008). A national view of promising programs and practices for culturally, linguistically, and ethnically diverse gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 131–145

Chavez

(2005). Community, ethnicity, and class in a changing rural California town. Rural Sociology, 70, 314–335

Colangelo

Assouline

S. G.

New

J. K.

(1999). Gifted education in rural schools: A national assessment. Iowa City: University of Iowa. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED430766)

10.

Collins

(1999). Attracting and retaining teachers in rural areas. Retrieved June 17, 2008, from www.ericdigests.org/2000–4/rural.htm

11.

Corbett

(2007). Learning to leave: The irony of schooling in a coastal community. Black Point, Nova Scotia, Canada: Fernwood

12.

Cross

Burney

(2005). High ability, rural, and poor: Lessons from Project Aspire and implications for school counselors. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 148–156

13.

Dayton

(1998). Rural school funding inequities: An analysis of legal, political, and fiscal issues. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 14, 142–148

14.

Delisle

J. R.

(1993). Halfway there: A retrospective of a career in progress. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 5, 14–17

15.

DiMaggio

P. J.

Powell

(1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160

16.

Dorfman

(2000). We built it and they came: A case study of Wahluke High School, Mattawa, Washington (RIK65325). Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Lab

17.

Economic Research Service. (2004). Rural income, poverty, and welfare: Rural poverty. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/IncomePovertyWelfare/ruralpoverty

18.

Evans

G. W.

English

(2002). The environment of poverty: Multiple stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional adjustment. Child Development, 73, 1238–1248

19.

Evers

C. M.

Walberg

H. J.

(Eds.). (2002). School accountability. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press

20.

Gilbert-Macmillan

(2000). Computer-based distance learning for gifted students: The EPGY experience. Understanding Our Gifted, 12 (3), 17–20

21.

Grey

M. A.

(1997). Secondary labor in the meatpacking industry: Demographic change and student mobility in rural Iowa schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 13, 153–164

22.

Hammer

P. C.

Hughes

McClure

Reeves

Salgado

(2005). Rural teacher recruitment and retention practices: A review of the research literature, national survey of rural superintendents, and case studies of programs in Virginia. Charleston, WV: Edvantia. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED489143)

23.

Harmon

H. L.

(2003). Opportunities for ESAs serving rural school districts. Perspectives: A Journal of Research and Opinion about Educational Service Agencies, 9, 5–12

24.

Hébert

T. P.

Beardsley

T. M.

(2001). Jermaine: A critical case study of a gifted Black child living in rural poverty. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 85–103

25.

Hoppe

R. A.

MacDonald

J. M.

Banker

D. E.

(2006). America's diverse family farms: Structure and finances. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service

26.

Howley

(2002). The progress of gifted students in a rural district that emphasized acceleration strategies. Roeper Review, 24, 158–160. (Original work published 1989)

27.

Howley

(2003). Tried and true: The rural school curriculum in the age of accountability. Educational Forum, 68 (1), 14–23

28.

Howley

(2006). Small schools and the pressure to consolidate. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 14 (10). Retrieved March 31, 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n10

29.

Howley

Burgess

Pusateri

(2008). Social class, Amish culture, and an egalitarian ethos: Case study from a rural school serving Amish children. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 23 (3). Retrieved May 23, 2008, from www.jrre.psu.edu

30.

Howley

Pendarvis

(1986). Teaching gifted children: Principles and strategies. Boston: Little, Brown

31.

Howley

Larson

Andrianaivo

Rhodes

Howley

(2007). Standards-based reform of mathematics education in rural high schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 22 (2). Retrieved May 18, 2007, from www.umaine.edu/jrre/22–2.pdf

32.

Howley

Woodrum

Pendarvis

(2005). The rural school principalship: Promises and challenges. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools

33.

Howley

C. B.

Howley

(2008, October). Organizing a model of authentic, community-based education in the rural schools of Alabama. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Society for Educational Planning, Istanbul, Turkey

34.

Howley

C. B.

Howley

C. W.

(2006, April). Saving the children of the poor in rural schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA

35.

Jimerson

(2003). The competitive disadvantage: Teacher compensation in rural America (Policy Brief). Washington, DC: Rural School and Community Trust

36.

Jimerson

(2005). Placism in NCLB—How rural children are left behind. Equity and Excellence in Education, 38, 211–219

37.

Johnson

T. E.

Brophy

(2006). Dual enrollment: Measuring factors for rural high school student participation. Rural Educator, 28 (1), 25–32

38.

Karp

M. M.

Calcagno

J. C.

Hughes

K. L.

Jeong

D. W.

Bailey

T. R.

(2007). The postsecondary achievement of participants in dual enrollment: An analysis of student outcomes in two states. New York: Columbia University, Community College Research Center. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED498661)

39.

Klein

(2007). Acceleration under review. Education Week, 26 (44), 22–24

40.

Lamb

J. H.

(2007). The testing culture in one rural Mississippi school. High School Journal, 90 (4), 32–43

41.

Lareau

(1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education. New York: Falmer Press

42.

Lawrence

B. K.

(2001). Effects of state policies on facilities planning and construction in rural districts. Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED459970)

43.

Lewis

J. D.

(2000, March). Rural gifted education: Enhancing service delivery. Paper presented at the conference on Capitalizing Leadership in Rural Special Education: Making a Difference for Children and Families, Alexandria, VA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED439874)

44.

Lewis

J. D.

Hafer

(2007). The challenges of being gifted in a rural community. The Duke Gifted Letter, 7 (2). Retrieved July 2, 2008, from www.dukegiftedletter.com/articles/vol7no2_feature.html

45.

Lichter

Johnson

(2007). The changing spatial concentration of America's rural poor population. Rural Sociology, 72, 331–358

46.

Lockwood

A. T.

(1998). Talent and diversity: The emerging world of limited English proficient students in gifted education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education

47.

Lyson

T. A.

(1979). Going to college: An emerging rung on the agricultural ladder. Rural Sociology, 44, 773–790

48.

Maiden

Stearns

(2007). Fiscal equity comparisons between current and capital education expenditures and between rural and nonrural schools in Oklahoma. Journal of Education Finance, 33, 147–169

49.

McBride

R. O.

Lewis

(1993). Sharing the resources: Electronic outreach programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 372–386

50.

McCray

C. R.

Wright

J. V.

Beachum

F. D.

(2004). An analysis of secondary school principals' perceptions of multicultural education. Education, 125, 111–120

51.

McGranahan

D. A.

Beale

C. A.

(2002). Understanding rural population loss. Rural America, 17 (4), 2–11

52.

Merlin

D. S.

(1997). Adventures in radical acceleration: A mother's perspective. Gifted Child Today, 20 (2), 38–41, 48–49

53.

Monk

(2007). Recruiting and retaining high-quality teachers in rural areas. Future of Children, 17 (1), 155–174

54.

Murphy

Coffin

(2003). Synchronous communication in a web-based senior high school course: Maximizing affordances and minimizing constraints of the tool. American Journal of Distance Education, 17, 235–246

55.

Murray

Schaefer

(2006, October). Social and academic interventions for rural schools. Presentation at the National Rural Education Association in Kansas City, MO. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from www.nrcres.org/presentations/NREA_2006_Murray.ppt

56.

National Association for Gifted Children. (2005). State of the states 2004–2005. Washington, DC: Author

57.

National Center for Education Statistics. (2007). Percentage of gifted and talented students in public elementary schools, by sex, race/ethnicity, and state: 2002 and 2004. Retrieved July 9, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d07/tables/dt07_051.asp

58.

Nichols

S. L.

Glass

G. V.

Berliner

D. C.

(2006). High-stakes testing and student achievement: Does accountability pressure increase student learning? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 14 (1). Retrieved July 5, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v14n1/

59.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2002, 20 U.S.C. §6319 (2008)

60.

Olszewski-Kubilius

Lee

(2004). Gifted adolescents' talent development through distance learning. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28, 7–35

61.

Paul

(2005). A proposal to address the shortage of highly qualified mathematics teachers. Mathematics Teacher, 98, 456–458

62.

PBS. (2005). Why poverty persists in Appalachia. A Frontline interview with Cynthia Duncan for PBS. Retrieved June 18, 2008, from www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/countryboys/readings/duncan.html

63.

Peshkin

(1982). The imperfect union. Chicago: University of Chicago Press

64.

Popham

W. J.

(2005). AYP wriggle room running out. Educational Leadership, 63 (1), 85–87

65.

Post

Stambach

(1999). District consolidation and rural school closure: E pluribus unum? Journal of Research in Rural Education, 15 (2). Retrieved February 26, 2009, from www.jrre.psu.edu/articles/v15,n2,p106–117,Post.pdf www.jrre.psu.edu/articles/v15,n2,p106–117,Post.pdf

66.

Rakow

S. R.

(2008). Standards-based v. standards embedded curriculum: Not just semantics! Gifted Child Today, 31 (1), 43–49

67.

Reeves

(2003). Implementing the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for rural schools and districts. Naperville, IL: North Central Educational Lab. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED475037)

68.

Rogers

K. B.

(2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382–396

69.

Rosenkoetter

S. E.

Irwin

J. D.

Saceda

R. G.

(2004). Addressing personnel needs for rural areas. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27, 276–291

70.

Rural Policy Research Institute. (2006). Why rural matters II: The rural impact of the administration's FY07 budget proposal. Retrieved June 31, 2008, from www.rupri.org/panelandnetworkviewer.php?id=13

71.

Rural School and Community Trust. (2007, October). Why rural matters 2007: The realities of rural education growth. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from www.ruraledu.Org/site/apps/s/link.asp?c=beJMIZOCIrH&b=3508815

72.

Sankar-DeLeeuw

(2002). Gifted preschoolers: Parent and teacher views on identification, early admission, and programming. Roeper Review, 24, 172–177

73.

Sarason

(2002). Educational reform: A self-scrutinizing memoir. New York: Teachers College Press

74.

Sisk

D. A.

(1988). The bored and disinterested gifted child: Going through school lockstep. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 11 (4), 5–18

75.

Smyth

T. S.

(2008). Who is No Child Left Behind leaving behind? Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81, 133–137

76.

Southwick

J. W.

(2003). Distance education in the rural K-12 environment. Computers in the Schools, 20 (3), 27–32

77.

Spicker

Poling

S. N.

(1993). Identifying rural disadvantaged gifted students. Project SPRING: Special populations resource information network for the gifted. Bloomington: Indiana University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED365065)

78.

Stricker

(2008, March). Dakota diaspora: The out-migration of talented youth from one rural community. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York

79.

The Early College High School Initiative. (2008). Retrieved August 8, 2008, from www.earlycolleges.org

80.

Thomas

J. Y.

Brady

K. P.

(2005). Elementary and Secondary Education Act at 40: Equity, accountability, and the evolving federal role in public education. Review of Research in Education, 29, 51–68

81.

U.S. Census. (2006). Fact finder. Retrieved July 15, 2008, from http://factfinder.census.gov/

82.

Van Tassel-Baska

Brown

E. F.

(2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342–358

83.

Williams

D. T.

(2003). Closing the achievement gap: Rural schools. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED478574)

84.

Williams

Portin

(1997, March). The changing role of the principal in Washington state. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL

85.

Woodrum

(2004). State-mandated testing and cultural resistance in Appalachian schools: Competing values and expectations. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 19 (1). Retrieved September 16, 2007, from www.umaine.edu/jrre/19–1.htm

86.

Zarate

M. E.

Pachon

H. P.

(2006). Gaining or losing ground? Equity in offering Advanced Placement courses in California high schools 1997–2003. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, Tomas Rivera Policy Institute. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED502057)

Challenges Facing Rural Schools: Implications for Gifted Students

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References