Both the current school reform and standards movements call for enhanced quality of instruction for all learners. Recent emphases on heterogeneity, special education inclusion, and reduction in out-of-class services for gifted learners, combined with escalations in cultural diversity in classrooms, make the challenge of serving academically diverse learners in regular classrooms seem an inevitable part of a teacher's role. Nonetheless, indications are that most teachers make few proactive modifications based on learner variance. This review of literature examines a need for “differentiated” or academically responsive instruction. It provides support in theory and research for differentiating instruction based on a model of addressing student readiness, interest, and learning profile for a broad range of learners in mixed-ability classroom settings.
AndersonR., & PavanB. (1993). Nongradedness: Helping it to happen.Lancaster, PA: Technomic.
7.
ArchambaultF., WestbergK., BrownS., HallmarkB., EmmonsC, & ZhangW. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers (Research monograph 93102). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
8.
Baker MillerJ. (1986). Toward a new psychology of women (2nd ed.). Boston: Beacon.
9.
BearneE. (Ed.). (1996). Differentiation and diversity in the primary school.London: Routledge.
10.
BelenkyM., ClinchyB., GoldbergerN., & TaruleJ. (1986). Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind.New York: BasicBooks.
11.
Ben AriR., & ShafirD. (1988). Social integration in elementary school.Ramat-Gan, Israel: Bar Ilan University, Institute for the Advancement of Social Integration in the Schools.
12.
BennettN., DesforgesC, CockburnA., & WilkinsonB. (1984). The quality of pupils’ learning experiences.London: Erlbaum.
13.
BorkoH., MayfieldV., MarionS., FlexerR., & CumboK. (1997). Teachers’ developing ideas and practices about mathematics performance assessment: Successes, stumbling blocks, and implications for professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 259–278.
14.
BransfordJ., BrownA., & CockingR. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Mind, brain, experience, and school (Exp. ed.) Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
15.
BrimijoinK. (2001). Expertise in differentiation: A preservice and an inservice teacher make their way. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
16.
BrunerJ. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21–32.
17.
BunerJ. (1963). The process of education.New York: Vintage.
18.
BursteinN., & CabelloB. (1989). Preparing teachers to work with culturally diverse students: A teacher education model. Journal of Teacher Education, 40(5), 9–16.
19.
ByrnesJ. (1996). Cognitive development and learning in instructional contexts.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20.
CallahanC, TomlinsonC, MoonT., BrightonC, & HertbergH. (2003). Feasibility of high end learning in the middle grades.Charlottesville: University of Virginia, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
21.
CallisonD. (1998). Situated learning. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 25(2), 38–40, 50.
22.
CarbonaroW., & GamoranA. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 801–807.
23.
CollinsM., & AmabileT. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297–312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
24.
CsikszentmihalyiM.RathundeK., & WhalenS. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure.New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
DahloffM. (1971). Ability grouping, content validity, and curriculum process analysis.New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
Darling-HammondL., WiseA., & KleinS. (1999). A license to teach: Raising standards for teaching.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom.New York: The New Press.
28.
DenoS. (1994, February). Effects of support conditions on teachers instructional adaptation and student learning. Paper presented at the second annual Pacific Coast Research Conference, Lajolla, CA.
29.
DucetteJ., SewellT., & ShapiroJ. (1996). Diversity in education: Problems and possibilities. In MurrayF. B. (Ed.), The teacher educator's handbook (pp. 323–381). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
DunnR. (1996). How to implement and supervise a learning styles program.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
31.
DunnR. & GriggsS. (1995). Multiculturalism and learning style: Teaching and counseling adolescents.Westport, CT: Praeger.
32.
ElmoreR., PetersonP., & McCartheyS. (1996). Restructuring in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and school organization.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
33.
EvansR. (1996). The human side of school change: Reform, resistance, and the real-life problems of innovation.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
34.
FletcherT., BosC, & JohnsonL. (1999). Accommodating English language learners with language and learning disabilities in bilingual education classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14, 80–91.
35.
FuchsL., & FuchsD. (1998). General educators’ instructional adaptation for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 21, 23–33.
36.
FulkB., & Montgomery-GrymesD. (1994). Strategies to improve student motivation. Intervention in School and Clinic, 30, 28–33.
37.
GamoranA., & WeinsteinM. (1995). Differentiation and opportunity in restructured schools.Madison, WI: Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools. (ERIC Document No. ED 386 828)
38.
GarciaG. (1995). Equity challenges in authentically assessing students from diverse backgrounds. Educational Forum, 59(1), 64–73.
39.
GayferM. (1991). The multi-grade classroom: Myth and reality. A Canadian study.Toronto, Canada: Canadian Education Association.
40.
GilliganC. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
GrigorenkoE., & SternbergR. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 63, 295–312.
42.
GottfriedA. E., & GottfriedA. W. (1996). A longitudinal study of academic intrinsic motivation in intellectually gifted children: Childhood through early adolescence. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 179–183.
43.
HeathS. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
44.
HébertT. (1993). Reflections at graduations: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16, 22–28.
45.
HertbergH. (2003). The influence of training on middle school teachers’ writing instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
46.
HidiS. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a neutral resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60, 549–571
47.
HidiS., & AndersonJ. (1992). Situational interest and its impact on reading and expository writing. In RenningerK. A., HidiS., & KrappA. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 215–238). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48.
HidiS., & BerndorffD. (1998). Situational interest and learning. In HoffmannL., KrappA., RenningerK., & BaumertJ. (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on interest and gender (pp. 74–90). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
49.
HilliardA. (2003). No mystery: Closing the achievement gap between Africans and excellence. In PerryT., SteeleC., & HilliardA. (Eds.), Young, gifted, and Black: Promoting achievement among African-American students (pp. 131–165). Boston: Beacon.
50.
HootsteinE. (1998). Differentiation of instructional methodologies in subject-based curricula at the secondary level.Richmond, VA: Metropolitan Educational Research Consortium. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 130)
51.
HowardP. (1994). An owner's manual for the brain.Austin, TX: Leornian Press.
52.
JacksonA., & DavisG. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. A report of the Carnegie Corporation.New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
JensenE. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
54.
JohnsenS., HaenslyP., RyserG., & FordR. (2002). Changing general education classroom practices to adapt for gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 45–63.
55.
King-SearsM. (1998). Best academic practices for inclusive classrooms. In MeyenE., VergasonG., & WhelanR. (Eds.), Educating students with mild disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.; pp. 305–338). Denver: Love.
56.
KulikJ., & KulikC. (1991). Research on ability grouping: Historical and contemporary perspectives.Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 777)
57.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58.
LasleyT., & MatczynskiT. (1997). Strategies for teaching in a diverse society: Instructional models.Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
59.
LiebermanA. (1988). Expanding the leadership team. Educational Leadership, 56(1), 51–54.
60.
LouY., AbramiP., SpenceJ., PoulsenC, ChambersB., & d'ApolloniaS. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458.
61.
MarloweB., & PageM. (1998). Creating and sustaining the con-structivist classroom.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
62.
McintoshR., VaughnS., SchummJ., HaagerD., & LeeO. (1994). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249–261.
63.
McLaughlinM., & TalbertJ. (1993). Contexts that matter for teaching and learning: Strategic opportunities for meeting the nation's educational goals.Stanford, CA: Center for Research on the Context of Secondary School Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 357 023)
64.
MehlingerH. (1995). School reform in the information age.Bloomington: Indiana University, Center for Excellence in Education.
65.
MeierD. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons for America from a small school in Harlem.Boston: Beacon.
66.
MillerB. (1990). A review of the quantitative research on multi-grade instruction. Research in Rural Education, 7, 3–12.
67.
MinnerS. (1990). Teacher evaluations of case descriptions of LD gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 37–39.
68.
MoonT., TomlinsonC, & CallahanC. (1995). Academic diversity in the middle school: Results of a national survey of middle school administrators and teachers (Research Monograph 95124). Charlottesville: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Virginia.
69.
MoroccoC, RileyM., GordonS., & HowardC. (1996). The elusive individual in teachers’ planning. In BranniganG. (Ed.), The enlightened educator (pp. 154–176). New York: McGraw-Hill.
70.
National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
71.
OakesJ. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
72.
PaineL. (1990). Orientation towards diversity: What do prospective teachers bring? (Research/Technical Report 143). Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement
73.
PalincsarA. (1984, April). Working in the zone of proximal development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
74.
PerryT., SteeleC, & HilliardA. (2003). Young, gifted, and Black: Promoting high achievement among African American students.Boston: Beacon.
75.
PintrichP., & SchunkD. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application.Columbus, OH: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
76.
QueenJ. (1999). Curriculum practice in the elementary and middle school.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
77.
ReisS., NeuT., & McGuireJ. (1997). Case studies of high-ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Exceptional Children, 63, 463–479.
78.
ReisS., WestbergK., KulkiowichJ., CaillardF., HebertT., PluckerJ., PurcellJ., RogersJ., & SmistJ. (1993). Why not let high ability students start school in January: The curriculum compacting study (Research Monograph 93106). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
79.
RenningerK. (1990). Children's play interests, representations, and activity. In FivushR., & HudsonJ. (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (Emory Cognition Series, Vol. 3, pp. 127–165). New York: Cambridge University Press.
80.
RenningerK. (1998). The roles of individual interest(s) and gender in learning. An overview of research on preschool and elementary school-aged children/students. In HoffmannL., KrappA., RenningerK., & BaumertJ. (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the Seeon Conference on interest and gender (pp. 165–175). Kiel, Germany: IPN.
81.
ReynoldsT. (1999). Transforming teacher practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
82.
RichardsonV., & AndersP. (1994). A theory of change. In RichardsonV. (Ed.), Teacher change and the staff development process: A case in reading instruction (pp. 199–216). New York: Teachers College Press.
83.
RohrkemperM. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In SchunkD., & ZimmermanB. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 143–167). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Sapon-ShevinM. (2000/2001). Schools fit for all. Educational Leadership, 58(4), 34–39.
86.
SaxeG. (1990). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
87.
SchlechtyP. (1997). Inventing better schools: An action plan for educational reform.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
88.
SchoenfeldA. (1991). On mathematics as sense-making: An informal attack on the unfortunate divorce of formal and informal mathematics. In FossJ. F., PerkinsD. N., & SegalJ. W. (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 311–343). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89.
SchoenfeldA. (1999). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4–14.
90.
SchummJ., & VaughnS. (1991). Making adaptations for main-streamed students: General classroom teachers’ perspectives. Remedial and Special Education, 12(4), 18–27.
91.
SchummJ., & VaughnS. (1992). Planning for mainstreamed special education students: Perceptions of general classroom teachers. Exceptionality, 3, 81–98.
92.
SchummJ., & VaughnS. (1995). Getting ready for inclusion: Is the stage set?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 10, 169–179.
93.
SchummJ., & VaughnS., HaagerD., McDowellJ., RothleinL., & SaumellL. (1995). General education teacher planning: What can students with learning disabilities expect?Exceptional Children, 61, 335–52.
94.
SchweinhartL. & WeikartD. (1988). Education for young children living in poverty: Child-initiated learning or teacher-directed instruction?Elementary School Journal, 89, 212–225.
95.
SharanY., & SharanS. (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation.New York: Teachers College Press.
96.
SimpsonM. (1997). Developing differentiation practices: Meeting the needs of teachers and pupils. The Curriculum Journal, 8(1), 85–104.
97.
SimpsonM., & UreJ. (1994). Studies of differentiation practices in primary and secondary schools (Interchange Report #30). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Council for Research in Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 380 196)
98.
SizerT. (1985). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school.Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
99.
SousaD. (2001). How the brain learns (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
100.
SternbergR. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
101.
SternbergR. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life.New York: Plume.
102.
SternbergR. (1997). What does it mean to be smart?Educational Leadership, 55(7), 20–24.
103.
SternbergR., & GrigorenkoE. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style?American Psychologist, 52, 700–712.
StradlingB., & SaundersL. (1993). Differentiation in practice: Responding to the needs of all pupils. Educational Research, 35, 127–137.
106.
SullivanM. (1993). A meta-analysis of experimental research studies based on the Dunn and Dunn learning styles model and its relationship to academic achievement and performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY.
107.
TannenD. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation.New York: Ballentine.
108.
TiesoC. (2002). The effects of grouping and curricular practices on intermediate students’ math achievement. (Research Monograph 02154). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
109.
TobiasS. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37–54.
110.
TomlinsonC. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: One school's journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 77–87.
111.
TomlinsonC. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
112.
TomlinsonC. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
113.
TomlinsonC. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
114.
TomlinsonC., CallahanC., TomchinE., EissN., ImbeauM., & LandrumM. (1997). Becoming architects of communities of learning: Addressing academic diversity in contemporary class-rooms. Exceptional Children, 63, 269–282.
115.
TomlinsonC., CallahanC., & LelliK. (1997). Challenging expectations: Case studies of high-potential, culturally diverse young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(2), 5–17.
VallerandR., GagnéF., SenecalG., & PelletierL. (1994). A comparison of the school intrinsic motivation and perceived competence of gifted and regular students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 68–72.
118.
VaughnS., & SchummJ. (1994). Middle school teachers’ planning for students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 15, 151–162.
119.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
120.
VygotskyL. (1986). Thought and language (KozulinA., Trans. & Ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
121.
WadeS., & AdamsB. (1990). Effects of importance and interest on recall of biographical text. JRB: A Journal of Literacy, 22, 331–353.
122.
WestbergK., ArchambaultF., DobynsS., & SalvinT. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms (Research Monograph 93104). Storrs: University of Connecticut, National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
123.
WhalenS. (1998). Flow and engagement of talent: Implications for secondary schooling. NASSP Bulletin, 82, 22–37.
WolfeP. (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
126.
ZimmermanB., & Martinez-PonsM. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.
