Through a qualitative research design, this study examined the differences between underachievement and selective achievement in a gifted university student. The findings indicated that, while the participant demonstrated behaviors typically associated with underachievement, his self-regulation and metacognitive abilities suggested a different image. These findings highlight a need to consider the attitudes and motivations behind the student's behavior when considering how to approach incidences of fluctuating academic performance of high-ability students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllenD. A. (1971). Underachievement is many-sided. Personnel & Guidance Journal, 49, 529–532.
2.
BakerJ. A. (1996). Everyday stressors of academically gifted adolescents. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 7, 353–368.
3.
BogdanR. C.BiklenS. K. (1998). Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4.
ClinkenbeardP. R. (1991). Unfair expectations: A pilot study of middle school students' comparisons of gifted and regular classes. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 15, 56–63.
5.
ColangeloN. (1997). Counseling gifted students: Issues and practices. In ColangeloN.DavisG. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (2nd ed., pp. 353–364). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
6.
ColangeloN.KerrB. A.ChristiansenP.MaxeyJ. (1993). A comparison of gifted underachievers and high achievers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 155–160.
DelisleJ. R. (1992). Guiding the social and emotional development of gifted youth. New York: Longman.
9.
DelisleJ. R.GalbraithJ. (2002). When gifted kids don't have all the answers: How to meet their social and emotional needs. Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit.
10.
DornbuschS. M.SteinbergL.FegleyS. (1993). Negative impact of part-time work on adolescent adjustment: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 29, 171–180.
11.
FehrenbachC. R. (1993). Underachieving gifted students: Intervention programs that work. Roeper Review, 16, 88–90.
12.
FordD. Y. (1996). Reversing underachievement among gifted Black students: Promising practices and programs. New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
GonzalezJ.HayesA. (1988). Psychosocial aspects of the development of gifted underachievers: Review and implications. The Exceptional Child, 35(1), 39–51
14.
HébertT. P. (2001). “If I had a new notebook, I know things would change”: Bright underachieving young men in urban classrooms. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45, 174–194.
15.
HubermanA. M.MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
HymerB. (2000). Understanding and overcoming underachievement in boys. In MontgomeryD. (Ed.), Able underachievers (pp. 62–75). London: Whurr.
17.
KressC. A. (1998). Understanding the consistently misunderstood: The “underachieving gifted” child. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 6, 204–207.
18.
LaffoonK. S.Jenkins-FriedmanR.TollefsonN. (1989). Causal attributions of underachieving gifted, achieving gifted, and nongifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 4–21.
19.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
MilesM.HubermanA. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
ReisS. M.BurnsD. E.RenzulliJ. S. (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high-ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
24.
ReisS. M.McCoachD. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go?. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170.
25.
RenzulliJ. S.ReidB. D.GubbinsE. J. (1992). Setting an agenda: Research priorities for the gifted and talented through the year 2000. Storrs: University of Connecticut, The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
26.
RimmS. B. (1995). When bright kids get poor grades: And what you can do about it. New York: Crown.
27.
RimmS. B.LoweB. (1988). Family environment of underachieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 353–359.
28.
SeidmanI. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
SchunkD. H. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195–208.
30.
SchultzR. A. (2002a). Understanding giftedness and underachievement: At the edge of possibility. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 193–208.
31.
SchultzR. A. (2002b). Illuminating realities: A phenomenological view from two underachieving gifted learners. Roeper Review, 24, 203–212.
32.
WhitmoreJ. R. (1986). Understanding a lack of motivation to excel. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30, 66–69.
33.
WolcottH. F. (1995). The art of fieldwork. London: AltaMira Press.
34.
ZimmermanB. J. (1998). Academic studying and the development of personal skill: A self-regulatory perspective. Educational Psychologist, 33, 73–86.
