Cross-Cultural Predictors of Teachers' Attitudes toward Gifted Education: Finland,Hong Kong,and the United States

Abstract

This study investigated culture-dependent attitudes and predictors of these attitudes of teachers (147–Finland, 214–Hong Kong, 160–United States) toward gifted education. Preservice, regular classroom, and gifted education teachers completed the attitude scale toward gifted education developed by Gagné and Nadeau (1985). A new method was introduced as an alternative approach in prediction. Finally, the results of this study were compared to an earlier study using more traditional quantitative methods (Tallent-Runnels, Tirri, & Adams, 2000). Results revealed 5 major predictors of attitudes for the 3 countries. These were whether or not they believed (a) they had gifted children in their school, (b) all children are gifted, (c) gifted children should spend their spare time helping others progress, (d) parents have the major responsibility for helping gifted children develop then talents, and (e) the best way to meet the needs of gifted children is in special classes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Awanbor

(1991). Teachers and their gifted children in the classroom: A perceptual analysis. Gifted Education International, 7, 82–84.

Begin

Gagné

(1994). Predictors of attitudes toward gifted education: A review of the literature and a blueprint for future research. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 17, 161–179.

Bennett

(1990). Comprehensive multicultural education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Berger

(1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Busse

Dahme

T. G.

Wagner

Wieczerkowski

(1986). Factors underlying teacher perceptions of highly gifted students: A cross-cultural study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 903–915.

Copenhaver

McIntyre

(1992). Teachers' perceptions of gifted students. Roeper Review, 14, 151–153.

Dettmer

(1985). Attitudes of school role groups toward learning needs of gifted students. Roeper Review, 11, 72–76.

Gagné

(1983). Perceptions of programs for gifted children: Agreement on principles, but disagreement over modalities. British Columbia Journal of Special Education, 7, 113–127.

Gagné

Nadeau

(1985). Dimensions of attitudes towards giftedness. In Roldan

A. H.

(Ed.), Gifted and talented children, youth, and adults: Their social perspectives and cultures (pp. 148–170). Manila: Reading Dynamics.

10.

Howson

Urbach

(1993). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. Chicago: Open Court.

11.

Jones

Southern

(1992). Programming, grouping, and acceleration in rural school districts: A survey of attitudes and practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 112–117.

12.

Klecka

(1981). Discriminate analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

13.

Morris

(1987). Student teachers' attitudes toward gifted students. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 12, 112–114.

14.

Myllymäki

Silander

Tirri

Uronen

(2001). Bayesian data mining on the Web with B-Course. In Cercone

Lin

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 626–629). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Computer Society Press.

15.

Ojanen

Freeman

(1994). The attitudes and experiences of head teachers, class teachers, and highly-able students towards the education of the highly able in Finland and Britain (Research Reports of the Faculty of Education No. 54). Joensuu, Finland:University of Joensuu.

16.

Silander

Tirri

(1999). Bayesian classification. In Ruohotie

Tirri

Nokelainen

Silander

(Eds.), Modern modeling of professional growth (pp. 61–83). Saarijärvi, Finland: Sarrijärven Offset Oy.

17.

Tallent-Runnels

Tirri

Adams

(2000). A cross-cultural study of teachers' attitudes toward gifted children and programs for gifted children. Gifted and Talented International, 15, 103–115.

18.

Tirri

(1993). Evaluating teacher effectiveness by self-evaluation: A cross-cultural study (Research Report 122). University of Helsinki.

19.

Tirri

(1997). How Finland meets the needs of gifted and talented students. High Ability Studies, 8, 213–222.

20.

Tirri

Uusikylä

(1994). How teachers perceive differentiation of education among the gifted and talented. Gifted and Talented International, 9, 69–73.

21.

Townsend

Patrick

(1993). Academic and psychosocial apprehensions of teachers and teacher trainees toward the educational acceleration of gifted children. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 28, 29–41.

22.

VanTassel-Baska

(1992). Education decision making on acceleration and grouping. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 68–72.