Large differences in scientific productivity between male and female researchers have
not yet been explained satisfactorily. This study finds that child care and lack of research
collaboration are the two factors that cause significant gender differences in scientific
publishing. Women with young children and women who do not collaborate in research
with other scientists are clearly less productive than both their male and female
colleagues.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bayer, Alan, and Jeffrey Dutton.1977. Career age and research: Professional activities of academic scientistsJournal of Higher Education48:259-82.
2.
Bernard, Jessie.1964. Academic women.University Park : Pennsylvania State University Press.
3.
Blackburn, Robert, Charles Behymer, and David Hall.1978. Research note: Correlates of faculty publicationsSociology of Education51:132-41.
4.
Cole, Jonathan.1979. Fair science: Women in the scientific community.New York: Free Press.
5.
-. 1981. Women in scienceAmerican Scientist69:385-91.
6.
Cole, Jonathan, and Stephen Cole.1973. Social stratification in science.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
Cole, Jonathan, and Burton Singer.1991. A theory of limited differences: Explaining the productivity puzzle in science In The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, edited by Harriet Zuckerman, Jonathan Cole, and John Bruer, 277-310. New York: Norton.
8.
Cole, Jonathan, and Harriet Zuckerman .1984. The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists In Advances in motivation and achievement , vol. 2, edited by P. Maehr and M. W. Steinkamp, 217-58. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9.
Dennis, Wayne.1966. Creative productivity between the ages of 20 and 80 yearsJournal of Gerontology21:1-8.
10.
Fox, Mary Frank.1991. Gender, environmental milieu and productivity in science In The outer circle: Women in the scientific community , edited by Harriet Zuckerman, Jonathan Cole, and John Bruer, 188-204. New York: Norton.
11.
Fox, Mary Frank, and Catherine Faver .1985. Men, women, and publication productivity: Patterns among social work academicsSociological Quarterly26:537-49.
12.
Gordon, Michael.1980. A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers and their acceptance for publicationScientometrics2:193-201.
13.
Knorr, Karin, Roland Mittermeir, Georg Aichholzer, and Georg Waller.1979. Individual publication productivity as a social position effect in academic and industrial research units In Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries, edited by Frank Andrews, 55-94. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; Paris: UNESCO.
14.
Kyvik, Svein.1990a. Age and scientific productivity: Differences between fields of learningHigher Education19:37-55.
15.
-. 1990b. Motherhood and scientific productivitySocial Studies of Science20:149-60.
16.
-. 1991. Productivity in academia: Scientific publishing at Norwegian universities.Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
17.
Kyvik, Svein, and Ingvild Larsen.1994. International contact and research performanceScientometrics29:161-72.
18.
Lawani, S.1986. Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific researchScientometrics9:13-25.
19.
Long, J. Scott.1990. The origins of sex differences in scienceSocial Forces68:1297-1316.
20.
-. 1992. Measures of sex differences in scientific productivitySocial Forces71:159-78.
21.
Long, J. Scott, Paul D. Allison, and Robert McGinnis .1993. Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivityAmerican Sociological Review58:703-22.
22.
O'Leary, Virginia E., and Judith M. Mitchell .1990. Women connecting with women: Networks and mentors in the United States In Storming the tower, edited by Suzanne Stiver Lie and Virginia E. O'Leary, 58-73. London: Kogan Page.
23.
Pelz, Donald, and Frank Andrews.1966. Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development.New York: Wiley.
24.
Presser, Stanley.1980. Collaboration and the quality of researchSocial Studies of Science10:95-101.
25.
Price, Derek de Solla, and Donald Beaver.1966. Collaboration in an invisible collage . American Psychologist21:1011-18.
26.
Reskin, Barbara.1978. Sex differentiation and the social organization of science In The sociology of science, edited by Jerry Gaston, 6-37. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Stephan, Paula, and Sharon Levin.1987. Demographic and economic determinants of scientific productivityAtlanta: Georgia State University Press.
28.
-. 1992. Striking the mother lode in science: The importance of age, place, and time.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29.
Stolte-Heiskanen, Veronica.1983. The role and status of women scientific workers in research groups In Research in the interweave of social roles , vol. 3, edited by J. Pleck and H. Lopata. Greenwich, CT: JAI.
30.
Trow, Martin, and Oliver Fulton.1975. Research activity in American higher education In Teachers and students: Aspects ofAmerican higher education, edited by Martin Trow, 39-83. New York: McGraw-Hill.
31.
Zuckerman, Harriet, and Robert Merton.1971. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee systemMinerva9:66-100.
