One of the most dramatic techniques for constructing accounts of "undiscovery" or
incompetence in science involves the manipulative deception—in some accounts, the
"hoaxing"—of the putatively incompetent researcher, ostensibly as an experiment to
evaluate his or her methodology and the soundness of his or her knowledge claims. In
this article, the author examines five cases in which such deceptions have been employed,
noting the patterns of argument that typically follow these deceptions and the factors that
seem to determine the power of these arguments. The author suggests that the "hoaxer"
in such cases is most likely to be successful when his or her views about the targeted
researcher's methodology and knowledge claims are orthodox with respect to his or her
intended audience.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ashmore, M.1993. The theatre of the blind. Social Studies of Science23.67-106.
2.
Beardsley, T.1985. MacLab, St. Louis, to shut. Nature317:6.
3.
Bebbington, P., and P. McGuffin.1988Schizophrenia: The major issuesOxford: Heinemann.
Blondlot, R.1904. Nouvelles expériences sur l'enregistrement photographique de l'action que les rayons N exercent sur une petite étincelle électrique . Comptes Rendus cxxxix (December 1904): 843.
6.
—. 1905. The N-Rays. London: Longmans, Green
7.
Bloor, D.1976. Knowledge and social imagery. London : Routledge.
8.
Braginsky, B.M., D.D. Braginsky, and K. Ring.1969. Methods of madness. The mental hospital as a last resortNew York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9.
Brannigan, A.1981The social basis of scientific discoveries. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
10.
Broad, W.J.1983Magician's efforts to foil scientists raises questions . New York Times, 15 February, 19, 21
11.
Brough, G.1991. Men who conned the world. Today, 9 September, 1-2, 11-12.
12.
Cherfas, J.1983The amazing Randi hoodwinks the spoonbenders. New Scientist, 3 February, 287.
13.
Chorost, M.1993. Report on the results of Project Argus: An instrumented study of the physical materials of crop circles. Durham, NC.
14.
Circlevision.1994. Crop circle communique II. Commercial video produced and edited by John and Jayne Macnish.
15.
Collins, H.M.1985. Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
Collins, H.M., and T.J. Pinch.1979. The construction of the paranormal: Nothing unscientific is happening. In On the margins of science: The social construction of rejected knowledge, edited by R. Wallis. Sociological Review Monograph 27, p.237-70. University of Keele, England.
18.
—. 1982. Frames of meaning: The social construction of extraordinary science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
19.
Cornference. 1992. A two-day crop circles research conference sponsored by The Cerealogist magazine, 22-23 August, Salisbury, Wiltshire, UK.
20.
Coughlin, E.1988. Scholar who submitted bogus article to journals may be disciplined. Chronicle of Higher Education, 2 November, A1, A7.
21.
—. 1989. Social workers' group plans no disciplinary action against researcher who submitted bogus articles. Chronicle of Higher Education, 5 April, A5, A6.
22.
Cozzens, S.1990. Editorial. Science, Technology & Human Values15: 5-8.
23.
Crown, S.1975. "On being sane in insane places": A comment from England . Journal of Abnormal Psychology84: 453-55.
24.
Delgado, P., and C. Andrews.1989. Circular evidence. London: Bloomsbury.
25.
—. 1990. The Latest Evidence. London: Bloomsbury.
26.
de Solla Price, D.J.1975. Science since Babylon. New Haven: Yale University Press. Epstein , W.1990a. Confirmational response bias among social work journals. Science, Technology & Human Values15:9-38.
27.
—. 1990b. The obligation of intellectuals. Science, Technology & Human Values15: 244-47.
28.
Feinberg, L.1988a. Panel orders D.C. researchers to apologize. Washington Post, 17 December, B5.
29.
—. 1988b. Social researcher's ethics challenged. Washington Post, 22 October, A11.
30.
Fleischman, P.1973. Letter to the editor. Science180: 356.
31.
Gardner, M.1951. Hermit scientists. In his Science: Good, bad, and bogus, 3-14. Buffalo: Prometheus .
32.
—. 1991. Project alpha. In his The New Age: Notes of a Fringe Watcher, 13-18. Buffalo: Prometheus .
33.
Girling, R. (managing editor of Sunday Times Magazine). 1992. Letter to the author, 16 June.
34.
Goleman, D.1988. Test of Journals is criticized as unethical. New York Times, 27 September, p. C1-4.
35.
—. 1989. Charge dropped on bogus work. New York Times, 4 April.
36.
Gould, S.J.1980. The panda's thumb. New York: Norton.
37.
Grafton, A.1990. Forgers and critics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
Hollander, R.1990. Journals have obligations, too. Science, Technology & Human Values15:46-49.
39.
Hopps, J.1990. Reflections on "Confirmational response bias among social work journals." Science, Technology & Human Values15:39-45.
40.
Hunter, R.1973. Letter to the editor. Science180:361.
41.
Israel, J.1973. Letter to the editor. Science180:355-56.
42.
Jahn, M.E., and D.J. Woolf.1963. The lying stones of Dr. J.B.A. Beringer . Berkeley: University of California Press.
43.
Jaroff, L.1991. It happens in the best circles. Time, 23 September, 84.
44.
Jones, M., ed. 1990. Fake? The art of deception. Berkeley: University of California Press.
45.
Juniper.1991. The strange case of crop circles. Equinox/Channel Four, 27 October.
46.
Kesey, K.1962. One flew over the cuckoo's nest. New York: Viking.
47.
Klotz, I.1980. The N-Rays. Scientific American (May 1980): 122-31.
48.
Krogman, W.1978. The planned planting of Piltdown: Who? why? In Human evolution, biosocial perspectives, edited by S. L. Washburn and E. R. McCown.Menlo Park: Benjamin Cummings.
49.
LaFollette, M.1992. Stealing into print. Berkeley: University of California Press.
50.
Lagemann, R.1977. New light on old rays: N-rays. American Journal of Physics45:281-84.
51.
Langmuir, I.1953. Pathological science. Transcription from audio by R. N. Hall. General Electric R&D Centre Report 68-C-035, New York.
52.
Lerman, P.1981. Deinstitutionalization. Rockville: Department of Health and Human Services.
53.
Lummer, O.1904. The n-rays. Nature69:378.
54.
Mahoney, M.1977. Publication prejudices. Cognitive Therapy and Research1:161-75.
55.
—. 1990. Bias, controversy, and abuse in the study of the scientific publication system. Science, Technology & Human Values15:50-55.
56.
McHugh, P.1992. Psychiatric misadventures. The American Scholar61:497-510.
57.
Meaden, G.T.1989. The circles effect and its mysteries. Bradford-on-Avon: Artetech.
58.
Merton, R.1973. The sociology of science. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
59.
Michell, J.1990. What mean these marks? In The crop circle enigma, edited by R. Noyes, p.45-59. Bath , U K.: Gateway.
60.
Notes. 1904. Nature70 (13 October): 583.
61.
Noyes, R., ed. 1990. The crop circle enigma. Bath, U.K.: Gateway .
62.
Nye, M.J.1980. N-rays: An episode in the history and psychology of science . Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences11:125-56.
63.
Peters, D.P., and S.J. Ceci.1982. Peer review practices of psychological journals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences5:187-95.
64.
Phillips, P.1983. Press release responding to James Randi's news conference .
65.
Phillips, P., and M. Shafer.1981a. Public statement on research with Mike Edwards, McDonnell Laboratory for Psychical Research, 1 September.
66.
—. 1981b. Public statement on research with Steve Shaw, McDonnell Laboratory for Psychical Research, 1 September.
67.
Picart, J.C.S.1994. Scientific controversy as farce: The Benveniste-Maddox counter-trials. Social Studies of Science24: 7-37.
68.
Pinch, T.1979. Normal explanations of the paranormal: The demarcation problem in fraud and parapsychology. Social Studies of Science9:329-48.
69.
—. 1993. Science in the open: The crop circles in England. Paper presented at a meeting of the Society for the Social Studies of Science, 19 November, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
70.
Pinch, T., and H.M. Collins.1984. The committee for the scientific investigation of the claims of the paranormal and its use of the literature. Social Studies of Science14:521-46.
71.
Purcell, K., K. Brady, and H. Chai.1969. The effect on asthma in children of experimental separation of the family. Psychosomatic Medicine1:144-64.
72.
Randles, J., and P. Fuller.1990. Crop circles: A mystery solved. London: Hale.
73.
Rosenhan, D.1973. On being sane in insane places. Science179:250-58.
74.
Sapp, J.1990. Where the truth lies: Franz Moewus and the origins of molecular biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
75.
Schnabel, J.1993a. The Fortean Times guide to the English circlemakers. Fortean Times69 (June): 37-41.
76.
—. 1993b. Round in circles. London: Hamish Hamilton.
77.
—. 1993c. The 65 faces of Donna. The Independent on Sunday Review, October 24, 10-15.
78.
Seabrook, W.1941. Doctor Wood. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
79.
Shapin, S., and S. Schaffer.1985. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the expertmental life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
