Bloor, David.1991. Afterword: Attacks on the strong programme. In Knowledge and social imagery, 2d ed., edited by David Bloor, 163-85. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Burrows, Andrea.1991. A social study of women in contemporary biological sciences . Ph.D. diss., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg.
3.
Coulter, Jeff.1989. Mind in action. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.
4.
Fuhrman, Ellsworth.1989-90. Reflexivity and Alvin Gouldner: The coming crisis twenty years later. American Sociologist20:357-61.
5.
Gilbert, G. Nigel, and Michael Mulkay.1984. Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Latour, Bruno.1990. "Postmodern?No, simply amodem: Steps towards an anthropology of science," Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science21:145-71.
7.
Lynch, Michael.1985. Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk in a research laboratory. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
8.
Lynch, William T.1990. Ideology and the sociology of scientific knowledge. Paper presented at the Society for the Social Studies of Science Annual Meeting, Minneapolis.
9.
—. 1991. Politics in Hobbes' mechanics: The social As enabling . Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science22:295-320.
10.
—. Forthcoming. What does the double hermeneutic explain/justify? Social Epistemology.
11.
Lyne, John, and Henry Howe. Forthcoming. Gene talk in sociobiology. Social Epistemology.
12.
Murray, Patrick.1988. Marx's theory of scientific knowledge. New York: Humanities Press.
13.
Restivo, Sal.1988. Modern science as a social problem. Social Problems35:206-25.
14.
Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer.1985. Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Traweek, Sharon.1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists . Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
