Political decision theory provides a framework for evaluating three approaches to
military research and development: offensive weaponry intended for deterrence, the
Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) and other weaponry intended fordefense, and cutbacks
designed to slow the research and development (R&D) treadmill. Large-scale R&D does
not protect against most of the risks facing national security. Nor does an R&D-intensive
approach provide the flexibility necessary to adjust military policy in light of rapidly
changing international conditions. Considering all factors together, there is a strong
theoretical case for placing sharp constraints on military innovation, not just on the
quantities of weapons deployed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, Gordon.1981. The iron triangle: The politics of defense contracting . New York: Council on Economic Priorities.
2.
Allison, Graham, and Frederic A. Morris .1975. Armaments and arms control: Exploring the determinants of military weapons. Daedalus104:99-129.
3.
Art, Robert J., and Stephen C. Ockenden .1981. The domestic politics of cruise missile development, 1970-1980. In Cruise missiles: Technology, strategy, politics, edited by Richard K. Betts, 359-413. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
4.
Betts, Richard K.1982. Cruise missiles and U.S. policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
5.
Boffey, Philip M.1988. Claiming the heavens: The New York Times complete guide to the star wars debate. New York: Times Books.
6.
Brooks, Harvey.1975. The military innovation system and the qualitative arms race. Daedalus104:75-97.
7.
Budyko, M.I., and G.S. Golitsyn.1988. Global climatic catastrophes. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Collingridge, David.1980. The social control of technology. New York: St. Martin's.
9.
— 1983. Technology in the policy process: The control of nuclear power. New York: St. Martin's.
10.
Council on Economic Priorities.1988. Star wars: The economic fallout. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
11.
Evangelista, Matthew.1988. Innovation and the arms race: How the United States and the Soviet Union develop new military technologies. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
Fox, J. Ronald.1988. The defense management challenge: Weapons acquisition . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
13.
Frei, Daniel.1982. Risks of unintentional nuclear war. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research .
14.
Gansler, Jacques.1980. The defense industry. Cambridge: MIT Press.
15.
—. 1989. Affording defense. Cambridge: MIT Press.
16.
Greenwood, Ted.1975. Making the MIRV: A study of defense decision making. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
17.
—. 1990. Why military technology is difficult to restrain. Science, Technology, & Human Values, this issue.
18.
Harwell, Mark A.1984. Nuclear winter: The human and environmental consequences of nuclear war. New York: Springer-Verlag .
19.
Hughes, Thomas Parke.1983. Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880-1930. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
20.
Kaldor, Mary.1981. The baroque arsenal. New York: Hill & Wang.
21.
—. 1986. The weapons succession process. World Politics38:577-95.
22.
Kotz, Nick.1988. Wild blue yonder: Money, politics, and the B-1 bomber . New York: Pantheon.
23.
Lakoff, Sanford, and W. Erik Bruvold .1990. Controlling the qualitative arms race: The primacy of politics. Science, Technology, & Human Values, this issue.
24.
Lakoff, Sanford, and Herbert F. York .1989. A shield in space? Technology, politics, & the strategic defense initiative. Berkeley : University of California Press.
25.
Lichtenberg, Frank R.1989. The impact of the strategic defense initiative on U. S. civilian R&D investment and industrial competitiveness. Social Studies of Science19:265-82.
26.
Lindblom, Charles E.1959. The science of "muddling through."Public Administration Review19:79-88.
27.
—. 1979. Still muddling, not yet through. Public Administration Review39:517-26.
28.
MacKenzie, Donald, and Graham Spinardi .1988. The shaping of nuclear weapon system technology: U.S. fleet ballistic missile guidance and navigation. Social Studies of Science18:419-63, 581-624.
29.
Melman, Seymour.1985. The permanent war economy: American capitalism in decline . New York: Touchstone.
30.
—. 1988. The demilitarized society: Disarmament and conversion . Montreal: Harvest House.
31.
Mikheev, Dmitrii.1987. Soviet perspectives on the strategic defense initiative . Washington, DC: Pergamon-Brassey's .
32.
Miller, Steven E.1984. Politics over promise: Domestic impediments to arms control . International Security8:67-90.
33.
Morone, Joseph G., and Edward J. Woodhouse .1986. Averting catastrophe: Strategies for regulating risky technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
—. 1989. The demise of nuclear energy? Lessons for democratic control of technology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35.
Nozette, Stewart, and Robert L. Kuhn, eds. 1987. Commercializing SDI technologies . New York: Praeger.
36.
Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress.1988. SDI: Technology, survivability, and software, ISC-353 . Washington, DC.
37.
Osgood, Robert E.1988. The nuclear dilemma in American strategic thought. Boulder, CO: Westview.
38.
Paine, Christopher, and Gordon Adams.1980. The R&D slush fund. The Nation, 26 January, 72-75.
39.
Rathjens, George W.1969. The dynamics of the arms race. Scientific American220:15-25.
40.
(Reprinted in Progress in arms control? edited by Bruce M. Russett and Bruce G. Blair.San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1979 .)
41.
Reppy, Judith V.1976. The IR&D program of the department of defense. Cornell University Peace Studies Program Occasional Paper no. 6. Ithaca, NY.
42.
Rouse, Joseph.1987. Knowledge and power: Toward a political philosophy of science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
43.
Russett, Bruce M.1970. What price vigilance? The burdens of national defense . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
Sapolsky, Harvey M.1972. The Polaris system development: Bureaucratic and programmatic success in government. Cambridge, CT: Harvard University Press.
45.
Schulman, Paul.1981. Large scale policy making. New York : Elsevier.
46.
Simon, Herbert A.1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics69:99-118.
47.
Teller, Edward.1987. Better a shield than a sword: Perspectives on defense and technology. New York: Free Press .
48.
United Nations, Department for Disarmament Affairs.1989. Study on the climatic and other global effects of nuclear war. New York: United Nations.
49.
Weick, Karl E.1984. Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American Psychologist39:40-49.
50.
Weinberger, Caspar.1988. Technology and freedom. Lecture at the Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Edinburgh, 12 August.
51.
Woodhouse, Edward J.1988. Sophisticated trial and error in decision making about risk. In Technology and Politics, edited by Michael E. Kraft and Norman J. Vig, 208-23. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
52.
Yarmolinsky, Adam.1971. The military establishment: Its impacts on American society . New York: Harper & Row.
53.
York, Herbert.1970. Race to oblivion: A participant's view of the arms race . New York: Simon & Schuster .
54.
Zegfeld, Walter, and Christien Enzing .1987. SDI and industrial technology policy: Threat or opportunity?New York: St. Martin's.
