The author draws on the policy analysis literature to delineate the linkage between
conceptualization of risk and the formulation and proposed solution of risk-related policy
problems. Two concepts of risk are identified: (1) a concept of risk as a physically given
attribute of hazardous technologies and (2) a concept of risk as a socially constructed
attribute. The argument is advanced that the social construction of risk provides a firm,
theoretical basis for the design of policy. The discussion links the perception, manage
ment, and communication of risk to the more fundamental issue of the nature and role
of science and technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackoff, R.L.1974. Redesigning the future : A systems approach to societal problems. New York: John Wiley.
2.
Bradbury, J.A.1989. The use of social science knowledge in implementing the Nuclear Waste Policy Act. Ph.D. diss., Graduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Pittsburgh.
3.
Campbell, D.T.1987. Guidelines for monitoring the scientific competence of preventive intervention research centers: An exercise in the sociology of scientific validity. Knowledge8:389-430.
4.
Clark, W.C.1980. Witches, floods, and wonder drugs: Historical perspectives on risk management. In Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough?, ed. R. C. Schwing and W. A. Albers, 287-313. New York: Plenum.
5.
Cohen, B.L.1980. Society's valuation of life saving in radiation protection and other contexts. Health Physics38:33-51.
6.
Conrad, J.1980. Society and risk assessment: An attempt at interpretation . In Society, technology and risk assessment, ed. J. Conrad, 241-76. New York: Academic Press.
7.
Covello, V.T.1987. Case studies of nsk communication: Introduction . In Risk communication: Proceedings of the National Conference on Risk Communication held in Washington, DC, January 1986, ed. J. C. Davies, V. T Covello , and F. W. Allen, 63-65. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
8.
Covello, V.T., D. von Wmterfeldt, and P. Slovic.1987. Communicating scientific information about health and environmental risks. In Risk communication: Proceedings of the National Conference on Risk Communication held in Washington, D.C, January 1986, ed. J. C. Davies, V T. Covello, and F. W. Allen, 109-34. Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
9.
Covello, V.T., and F. Allen.1988. Seven cardinal rules of risk communication . Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis.
10.
Covello, V.T., P.M. Sandman, and P. Slovic.1988. Risk communication, risk statistics, and risk comparisons: A manual for plant managers. Washington, DC: Chemical Manufacturers Association.
11.
Douglas, M., and A. Wildavsky.1982. Risk and culture. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
12.
Dunn, W.N.1981. Public policy analysis: An introduction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
13.
— 1982. Reforms as arguments. Knowledge: Creation, diffusion, utilization3(3):293-326.
14.
Forthcoming. Reconstructing policy inquiry: The logics of public discourse Evaluation and Program Planning.
15.
Dunn, W.N., and B. Holzner.1988. Anatomy of an emergent field. Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer1(1):3-26.
16.
Dunn, W.N., B. Holzner, and G. Zaltman.1985. Knowledge utilization. In The international encyclopedia of education, ed. T. Husen and T. N. Postlethwaite, 2831-39. Oxford : Pergamon.
17.
Earle, T.C., and G. Cvetovich.1985. Risk judgment and the communication of hazard information. In Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis, ed. V. T. Covello, J. L. Mumpower, P. J. M. Stallen, and V R. R. Uppuluri, 257-312. New York: Springer-Verlag .
18.
Elliott, M.L.P.1984. Improving community acceptance of hazardous waste facilities through alternative systems for mitigating and managing risk. Hazardous Waste1:397-410.
19.
Forthcoming. The effect of differing assessments of risk in hazardous waste facility siting negotiations. In Negotiating hazardous waste facility siting and permitting agreements, ed. G. Bingham and T. Mealey.Washington, DC: Conservation Foundation.
20.
Fischhoff, B.1979. Informed consent in societal risk-benefit decisions . Technological Forecasting and Social Change13:347-57.
21.
Fischhoff, B., S. Lichtenstein, P. Slovic, S.L. Derby, and R.L. Keeney.1981. Acceptable risk. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
22.
Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, and S. Lichtenstein .1983. The public vs. "the experts ." In The analysis of actual vs. perceived risks, ed. V. T. Covello, W. G. Flamm , J. V. Rodricks, and R. G. Tardiff, 235-49. New York: Plenum.
23.
Funtowicz, S.O., and J.R. Ravetz.1985. Three types of risk assessment: A methodological analysis. In Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis, ed. V. T. Covello, J. L. Mumpower, P. J. M. Stallen, and V. R. R. Uppuluri, 831-48. New York: Springer-Verlag.
24.
Habermas, J.1971. Knowledge and human interests. Boston : Beacon.
25.
Hadden, S.G.1984. Introduction Risk policy in American institutions . In Risk analysis, institutions, and public policy, ed. S. G. Hadden, 3-17. Port Washington, NY: Associated Faculty Press.
26.
Holzner, B., and E. Fisher.1979. Knowledge in use. Knowledge1:219-43.
27.
Kates, R., and J.X. Kasperson.1984. Comparative risk analysis of technological hazards (a review. CENTED Reprint no. 46. Worcester, MA: Clark Technology Center for Technology, Environment, and Development.
28.
Keim, D.W.1975. Participation in contemporary democratic theories . In Participation in politics, ed. J. R. Pennock, 1-38. New York: Liber-Atherton .
29.
Leiss, W., and D. Krewski.1987. Risk communication processes: A review of some conceptual models and some current practices. Department of Communication, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia.
30.
Lievrouw, L.A.1988. Four programs of research in scientific communication . Knowledge in Society: The International Journal of Knowledge Transfer1(2):6-22.
31.
Lowrance, W.1976. Of acceptable risk: Science and the determination of safety . Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman .
32.
MacLean, D.1986. Risk and consent: Philosophical issues for centralized decisions. In Values at risk, ed. D. MacLean, 17-30. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allenheld.
33.
Mitchell, R.C.1987. Nuclear and other energy sources. In Risk Communication: Proceedings of the National Conference on Risk Communication held in Washington, D.C, January 1986, ed. J. C. Davies, V. T. Covello , and F. W. Allen, 77-81. Washington, DC. Conservation Foundation.
34.
National Research Council, Commission on Life Sciences, Committee on the Institutional Means for Assessment of Risks to Public Health.1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
35.
Nelkin, D., ed. 1979. Controversy: Politics of technical decisions. Beverly Hills, CASage.
36.
Otway, H.J.1980. Discussion paper on A. Mazur. In Society, technology and risk assessment, ed. J. Conrad , 163-64. New York: Academic Press.
37.
Otway, H.J., and K. Thomas.1982. Reflections on risk perception and policy . Risk Analysis2:69-82.
38.
Plough, A., and S. Krimsky.1987. The emergence of risk communication studies: Social and political context. Science, Technology, & Human Values12 (Summer/Fall):4-10
39.
Ravetz, J.R.1973. Scientific knowledge and its social problems. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
Rayner, S.1984. Disagreeing about risk: The institutional cultures of risk management. In Risk analysis, institutions, and public policy, ed. S. G. Hadden, 150-68. Port Washington, NY: Associated Faculty Press.
42.
— 1987. Risk and relativism in science for policy. In The social and cultural construction of risk, ed. B. B. Johnson and V. T. Covello , 5-23. Norwell, MA: Reidel.
43.
— 1988. Muddling through metaphors to maturity: A commentary on Kasperson et al., "The social amplification of risk." Risk Analysis8:201-4.
44.
Rayner, S., and R. Cantor.1987. How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice. RiskAnalysis7:3-9.
45.
Rogers, E.M.1986. Communication technology. New York : Free Press.
46.
Rogers, E.M., and D.L. Kincaid.1981. Communication networks. Toward a new paradigm for research. New York: Free Press.
47.
Shrader-Frechette, K.1986. Risk-cost-benefit methodology and equal protection . In Risk evaluation and management, ed. V T. Covello, J. Menkes, and J. Mumpower, 275-96. New York: Plenum.
48.
Slovic, P.1986. Informing and educating the public about risk. Risk Analysis6:403-15.
49.
Slovic, P., B. Fischhoff, and S. Lichtenstein1977Behavioral decision theoryAnnual Review of Psychology28:1-39.
50.
— 1979. Rating the risks. Environment21(3):14-39.
51.
— 1980a. Facts and fears: Understanding perceived risk. In Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough?, ed. R. Schwing and W. A. Albers , 181-213. New York: Plenum.
52.
— 1980b. Informing people about risk. In Product labeling and health risks, ed L. Morns, M. Mazis, and B. Barofsky , 165-80. Banbury Report 6. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
53.
— 1981. Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications . In The assessment and perception of risk, ed. F. Warner and D. Slater, 17-34. London : Royal Society.
54.
— 1984. Perceptions and acceptability of risk from energy systems . In Public reactions to nuclear power, ed. W. Freudenburg and E. Rosa , 115-35. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
55.
Spangler, M.B.1985. Heuristic opinion and reference evaluation for assessing technological options—a user's view. In Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis, ed. V. T. Covello, J. L. Mumpower , P. J. M. Stallen, and V. R. R. Uppuluri, 917-52. New York: Springer-Verlag.
56.
Thompson, P.B., and W.J. Parkinson.1984. Distinguishing between HC/LP and LC/HP risk. In Low probability high consequence risk analysis, ed. R. A. Walker and V. T. Covello, 551-67. New York: Plenum .
57.
Toulmin, S.1958. The uses of argument. Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press.
58.
Toulmin, S., R. Rieke, and A. Jamk.1979. An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
59.
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.1975. Reactor safety study: An assessment of accident risks in U.S. commercial nuclear powerplants. WASH 1400. Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
60.
Vesely, W.E.1984. Robust risk analysis: The need for it in nuclear probability risk evaluations. In Low probability high consequence risk analysis, ed. R. A. Walker and V. T. Covello, 153-60. New York. Plenum.
61.
Weinberg, A.1972. Science and trans-science. Minerva10:209-22.
62.
Wilson, R.1979. Analyzing the daily risks of lifeTechnology Review (February).40-46
63.
Wynne, B.1980. Technology, risk and participation. In Society, technology and risk assessment, ed. J. Conrad, 173-208. New York: Academic Press.
64.
— 1983. Redefining the issue of risk and public acceptance . Futures15 (February):13-32.
65.
Zimmerman, R.1986. The management of risk In Risk evaluation and management , ed. V T. Covello, J. Menkes, and J. Mumpower , 435-60. New York: Plenum.
