Technology has a proprietary aspect and a public good aspect. The proprietary
aspect makes it profitable for firms to invest in its advance. The public aspect
enables the community as a whole to benefit from technological advance. In order
for technical advance to proceed rapidly and for the gams to be widely shared,
there must be an appropriate balance between the proprietary and public aspects.
Recent policy discussions have emphasized the proprietary aspects of technology,
calling for a tightening and broadening of intellectual property rights. Universities have been encouraged to be more proprietary. We may be in danger of
leaning too far in this direction.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Constant, E.W.1980. The origins of the turbojet revolution. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
2.
Freeman, C.1982. The economics of industrial innovation. London: Penguin.
3.
Hounshell, D.A.1984. From the American system to mass production, 1800-1932 . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press .
4.
Levin, R., Klevovick, A., Nelson, R., and Winter, S.1987. Appropriating the returns to industrial R and D. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987, no. 3. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
5.
Nelson, R.R.1987. Understanding technical change as an evolutionary process . Amsterdam: North Holland Press .
6.
Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G.1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
7.
Pavitt, K.1987. On the nature of technology. Inaugural lecture at the University of Sussex, June 23.
8.
Rosenberg, N.1982. Inside the black box: Technology and economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Rosenberg, N.1988. Why do companies do basic research (with their own money ? Mimeo, Stanford University, January.
10.
Schumpeter, Joseph.1950. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row. (First published 1942.)
