Advisory Council for Applied Research and Development.1986. Exploitable areas of science. London : ACARD, Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
2.
Ames, E.1961. Research, invention, development and innovation. American Economic Review51 (June): 370-81.
3.
Barnes, B.1982. The science-technology relationship: A model and a query . Social Studies of Science12 (February): 166-71.
4.
Bohme, G.1977. Models for the development of science. In Science, technology and society, ed. I. Spiegel-Rösing and D. de S. Price.London: Sage.
5.
____, W. van den Daele, and W. Krohn.1974. Finalization in science . Social Science Information15:307-30.
6.
Brown, Carole Ganz.1985The technological relevance of basic research. In Transforming scientific ideas into innovations: Science policies in the United States and Japan, ed. B. Bartocha and S. Okamura. Proceedings of the Third U. S.-Japan Science Policy Seminar, 19-22 February 1984. Tokyo: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
7.
____ and Joseph D. Sneed.1986. Setting priorities: Intellectual structure of a discipline . In Rise and fall of a priority field. Proceedings of the Second Joint Symposium of the European Science Research Councils and of the National Science Foundation of the USA, Paris, 22-24 September 1985. Strasbourg: ESRC/European Science Foundation.
8.
Callon, M., J. Law, and A. Rip, eds. 1986. Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. London : Macmillan.
9.
Carpenter, M.P., M. Cooper, and F. Narin.1980. Linkage between basic research literature and patents. Research Management23 (March): 30-35.
10.
Clark, Norman.1987. Similarities and differences between scientific and technological paradigms. Futures (February): 26-42.
11.
Coward, H.R., J.J. Franklin, and L. Simon.1984. A bibliometric model of microelectronics-solid state devices and processes: Analysis of 1982 epitaxy and microlithography research. Preliminary report to the U.S. National Science Foundation, Division of International Programs. Philadelphia : Center for Research Planning.
12.
Dosi, G.1982. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories . Research Policy11:147-62.
13.
Franklin, J.J., and R. Johnston.1988. Co-citation bibliometric modeling as a tool for S&T policy and R&D management: Issues, applications, and developments. In Handbook of the quantitative study of science and technology, ed. A.F.J. van Raan.Amsterdam: Elsevier.
14.
Hughes, T.P.1986. The seamless web: Technology, science, etcetera, etcetera. Social Studies of Science16:281-92.
15.
Knorr-Cetina, K.D.1981. Manufacture of knowledge. Oxford: Pergamon.
16.
Kuhn, T.S.1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17.
Kuppers, Gunter.1978. The relationship between technology and science. In The dynamics of science and technology, ed. W. Krohn et al., 113-33. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.
18.
Lakatos, I., and A. Musgrave , eds. 1972. Criticism and the growth of knowledge . New York and London: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Law, John.1986. Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge ? Sociological Review Monograph32. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
20.
Levin, Richard C.1982. The semiconductor industry. In Government and technical progress, ed. Richard Nelson.Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
21.
MacKenzie, D., and J. Wajcman , eds. 1985. The social shaping of technology . Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
22.
Narin, F., and E. Noma.1985. Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics7:369-81.
23.
National Science Foundation.1987. Strategic planning for science and technology. In Sixth meeting of European, Japanese and North American science and engineering officials , March 15-17, 1987, Belmont, Maryland, discussion areas, background materials. Washington, DC : National Science Foundation, Division of International Programs.
24.
Office of Technology Assessment and Forecast.1984. Technology profile report-semiconductor devices & manufacture. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.
25.
Price, D. J. de S.1965. Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture6:553-68.
26.
____. 1984. The science/technology relationship, the craft of experimental science, and policy for the improvement of high technology innovation. Research Policy13:3-20.
27.
Prusak, Leonard.1982. Does the patent system have measurable economic value ? American Patent Law Association Quarterly Journal10.
28.
Small, H., and B.C. Griffith.1974. The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Social Studies of Science4:17-40.
29.
Small, H., and E. Sweeney.1985. Clustering the "Science Citation Index" using co-citations: I. A comparison of methods. Scientometrics7:391-409.
30.
Wynne, Brian. Forthcoming. Unruly technology: practical rules, impractical discourses and public understanding. Social Studies of Science.
31.
Zandvoort, Henk.1986. Models of scientific developments and the case of nuclear magnetic resonance. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.